Interrogating the civic epistemology of American democracy

Stability and instability in the 2000 US Presidential election

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transitions of power are fragile, anxious moments for political systems. This paper explores how electoral machinery - the material and social technologies of casting, counting, and contesting votes - dynamically stabilizes democratic transitions. The paper analyzes the controversy surrounding the 2000 US Presidential election. For 36 days political stability in the USA hung on uncertainty over a seemingly simple matter of fact: which candidate won the most votes in the state of Florida. Interrogating the civic epistemology of US elections - the processes by which elections produce, validate, and put knowledge to use - the paper contends that electoral machinery functions to contain common uncertainties, contingencies, and conflicts that might otherwise destabilize democratic political order. The paper develops a model of electoral machinery as a loosely integrated network of sites including polling places, election administration, the courts, the media, and the American public. This network constructs credible knowledge in a distributed fashion and helps form an intermediate layer in US politics, integrating geography, state, and civil society. This network model of electoral machinery implicates both democratic theory and practical electoral reform.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)501-530
Number of pages30
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

presidential election
epistemology
election
democracy
voter
uncertainty
social technology
political stability
contingency
political system
civil society
candidacy
geography
reform
politics
American Democracy
Epistemology
Presidential Elections
Civics
Elections

Keywords

  • Civic epistemology
  • Democracy
  • Election
  • Knowledge
  • Stability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{0b6973d90ce14c998cf097745901ec72,
title = "Interrogating the civic epistemology of American democracy: Stability and instability in the 2000 US Presidential election",
abstract = "Transitions of power are fragile, anxious moments for political systems. This paper explores how electoral machinery - the material and social technologies of casting, counting, and contesting votes - dynamically stabilizes democratic transitions. The paper analyzes the controversy surrounding the 2000 US Presidential election. For 36 days political stability in the USA hung on uncertainty over a seemingly simple matter of fact: which candidate won the most votes in the state of Florida. Interrogating the civic epistemology of US elections - the processes by which elections produce, validate, and put knowledge to use - the paper contends that electoral machinery functions to contain common uncertainties, contingencies, and conflicts that might otherwise destabilize democratic political order. The paper develops a model of electoral machinery as a loosely integrated network of sites including polling places, election administration, the courts, the media, and the American public. This network constructs credible knowledge in a distributed fashion and helps form an intermediate layer in US politics, integrating geography, state, and civil society. This network model of electoral machinery implicates both democratic theory and practical electoral reform.",
keywords = "Civic epistemology, Democracy, Election, Knowledge, Stability",
author = "Clark Miller",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0306312704045661",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "501--530",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrogating the civic epistemology of American democracy

T2 - Stability and instability in the 2000 US Presidential election

AU - Miller, Clark

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Transitions of power are fragile, anxious moments for political systems. This paper explores how electoral machinery - the material and social technologies of casting, counting, and contesting votes - dynamically stabilizes democratic transitions. The paper analyzes the controversy surrounding the 2000 US Presidential election. For 36 days political stability in the USA hung on uncertainty over a seemingly simple matter of fact: which candidate won the most votes in the state of Florida. Interrogating the civic epistemology of US elections - the processes by which elections produce, validate, and put knowledge to use - the paper contends that electoral machinery functions to contain common uncertainties, contingencies, and conflicts that might otherwise destabilize democratic political order. The paper develops a model of electoral machinery as a loosely integrated network of sites including polling places, election administration, the courts, the media, and the American public. This network constructs credible knowledge in a distributed fashion and helps form an intermediate layer in US politics, integrating geography, state, and civil society. This network model of electoral machinery implicates both democratic theory and practical electoral reform.

AB - Transitions of power are fragile, anxious moments for political systems. This paper explores how electoral machinery - the material and social technologies of casting, counting, and contesting votes - dynamically stabilizes democratic transitions. The paper analyzes the controversy surrounding the 2000 US Presidential election. For 36 days political stability in the USA hung on uncertainty over a seemingly simple matter of fact: which candidate won the most votes in the state of Florida. Interrogating the civic epistemology of US elections - the processes by which elections produce, validate, and put knowledge to use - the paper contends that electoral machinery functions to contain common uncertainties, contingencies, and conflicts that might otherwise destabilize democratic political order. The paper develops a model of electoral machinery as a loosely integrated network of sites including polling places, election administration, the courts, the media, and the American public. This network constructs credible knowledge in a distributed fashion and helps form an intermediate layer in US politics, integrating geography, state, and civil society. This network model of electoral machinery implicates both democratic theory and practical electoral reform.

KW - Civic epistemology

KW - Democracy

KW - Election

KW - Knowledge

KW - Stability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7044235174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7044235174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306312704045661

DO - 10.1177/0306312704045661

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 501

EP - 530

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 4

ER -