Intergenerational continuity in high-conflict family environments: Investigating a mediating depressive pathway

W. Andrew Rothenberg, Andrea M. Hussong, Laurie Chassin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that family conflict shows continuity across generations and that intergenerational family conflict can be more intense and deleterious than conflict experienced in a single generation. However, few investigations have identified etiological mechanisms by which family conflict is perpetuated across generations. Addressing this limitation, we sampled 246 families from a multigenerational, high-risk, longitudinal study of parents (G1s) and their children (G2s), followed from adolescence to adulthood as well as the children (G3s) of G2 targets. Specifically, the current study examined whether G2s' depressive symptoms measured at multiple time points across development explained continuity in family conflict from 1 generation (G1-G2) to the next (G2-G3). Results revealed that after controlling for externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms served as mediators of intergenerational family conflict in both men and women, but in different ways. Specifically, G2 women's young adulthood represented a period of vulnerability in which G2 depressive symptoms were especially likely to mediate intergenerational continuity in family conflict. Additionally, in both men and women, higher G1-G2 family conflict was associated with higher depressive symptoms that persisted from adolescence into young adulthood and then subsequently predicted the development of G2-G3 family conflict. Results did not support the hypothesis that G2 partner depressive symptoms moderated the relation between G2 depressive symptoms and G2-G3 family conflict. Implications of findings regarding the roles that G2 gender and G2 depressive symptoms play in the intergenerational transmission of family conflict are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-396
Number of pages12
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Family Conflict
continuity
Depression
adulthood
adolescence
Longitudinal Studies
longitudinal study
Parents
vulnerability
parents

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Externalizing
  • Family conflict
  • Intergenerational
  • Multigenerational

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Intergenerational continuity in high-conflict family environments : Investigating a mediating depressive pathway. / Rothenberg, W. Andrew; Hussong, Andrea M.; Chassin, Laurie.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 385-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fde2968510ac462bb034828142958e50,
title = "Intergenerational continuity in high-conflict family environments: Investigating a mediating depressive pathway",
abstract = "Emerging evidence suggests that family conflict shows continuity across generations and that intergenerational family conflict can be more intense and deleterious than conflict experienced in a single generation. However, few investigations have identified etiological mechanisms by which family conflict is perpetuated across generations. Addressing this limitation, we sampled 246 families from a multigenerational, high-risk, longitudinal study of parents (G1s) and their children (G2s), followed from adolescence to adulthood as well as the children (G3s) of G2 targets. Specifically, the current study examined whether G2s' depressive symptoms measured at multiple time points across development explained continuity in family conflict from 1 generation (G1-G2) to the next (G2-G3). Results revealed that after controlling for externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms served as mediators of intergenerational family conflict in both men and women, but in different ways. Specifically, G2 women's young adulthood represented a period of vulnerability in which G2 depressive symptoms were especially likely to mediate intergenerational continuity in family conflict. Additionally, in both men and women, higher G1-G2 family conflict was associated with higher depressive symptoms that persisted from adolescence into young adulthood and then subsequently predicted the development of G2-G3 family conflict. Results did not support the hypothesis that G2 partner depressive symptoms moderated the relation between G2 depressive symptoms and G2-G3 family conflict. Implications of findings regarding the roles that G2 gender and G2 depressive symptoms play in the intergenerational transmission of family conflict are discussed.",
keywords = "Depression, Externalizing, Family conflict, Intergenerational, Multigenerational",
author = "Rothenberg, {W. Andrew} and Hussong, {Andrea M.} and Laurie Chassin",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/dev0000419",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "385--396",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intergenerational continuity in high-conflict family environments

T2 - Investigating a mediating depressive pathway

AU - Rothenberg, W. Andrew

AU - Hussong, Andrea M.

AU - Chassin, Laurie

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Emerging evidence suggests that family conflict shows continuity across generations and that intergenerational family conflict can be more intense and deleterious than conflict experienced in a single generation. However, few investigations have identified etiological mechanisms by which family conflict is perpetuated across generations. Addressing this limitation, we sampled 246 families from a multigenerational, high-risk, longitudinal study of parents (G1s) and their children (G2s), followed from adolescence to adulthood as well as the children (G3s) of G2 targets. Specifically, the current study examined whether G2s' depressive symptoms measured at multiple time points across development explained continuity in family conflict from 1 generation (G1-G2) to the next (G2-G3). Results revealed that after controlling for externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms served as mediators of intergenerational family conflict in both men and women, but in different ways. Specifically, G2 women's young adulthood represented a period of vulnerability in which G2 depressive symptoms were especially likely to mediate intergenerational continuity in family conflict. Additionally, in both men and women, higher G1-G2 family conflict was associated with higher depressive symptoms that persisted from adolescence into young adulthood and then subsequently predicted the development of G2-G3 family conflict. Results did not support the hypothesis that G2 partner depressive symptoms moderated the relation between G2 depressive symptoms and G2-G3 family conflict. Implications of findings regarding the roles that G2 gender and G2 depressive symptoms play in the intergenerational transmission of family conflict are discussed.

AB - Emerging evidence suggests that family conflict shows continuity across generations and that intergenerational family conflict can be more intense and deleterious than conflict experienced in a single generation. However, few investigations have identified etiological mechanisms by which family conflict is perpetuated across generations. Addressing this limitation, we sampled 246 families from a multigenerational, high-risk, longitudinal study of parents (G1s) and their children (G2s), followed from adolescence to adulthood as well as the children (G3s) of G2 targets. Specifically, the current study examined whether G2s' depressive symptoms measured at multiple time points across development explained continuity in family conflict from 1 generation (G1-G2) to the next (G2-G3). Results revealed that after controlling for externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms served as mediators of intergenerational family conflict in both men and women, but in different ways. Specifically, G2 women's young adulthood represented a period of vulnerability in which G2 depressive symptoms were especially likely to mediate intergenerational continuity in family conflict. Additionally, in both men and women, higher G1-G2 family conflict was associated with higher depressive symptoms that persisted from adolescence into young adulthood and then subsequently predicted the development of G2-G3 family conflict. Results did not support the hypothesis that G2 partner depressive symptoms moderated the relation between G2 depressive symptoms and G2-G3 family conflict. Implications of findings regarding the roles that G2 gender and G2 depressive symptoms play in the intergenerational transmission of family conflict are discussed.

KW - Depression

KW - Externalizing

KW - Family conflict

KW - Intergenerational

KW - Multigenerational

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041179312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041179312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/dev0000419

DO - 10.1037/dev0000419

M3 - Article

C2 - 29058932

AN - SCOPUS:85041179312

VL - 54

SP - 385

EP - 396

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 2

ER -