Inspiring integration in college students reading multiple biology texts

Carla Firetto, Peggy N. Van Meter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

College students often struggle when they are faced with situations where they are required to read multiple texts and integrate across them. The present study examines an integration task designed to stimulate cross-system integration for college biology students reading about two related physiological systems. Learners (n = 617) were randomly assigned to read about the endocrine and urinary systems in the form of either two separate texts or a single text as they completed one of three task conditions: an integration condition, a comprehension condition, or a comparison condition. After reading, learners completed a free recall test and these responses were scored for whether or not learners integrated between the two physiological systems. Findings revealed that learners who engaged in the condition designed to stimulate integration were statistically significantly more likely to have integrated than those in the two comparison conditions. In addition, learners who read about the systems in the format of a single text were statistically significantly more likely to integrate than those who read the texts separately. Learners' self-reported strategy use was also examined. Learners' integration strategy use mediated the impact of the integration condition on the integration outcome measure. In sum, there is evidence that the integration condition employed in this study is a promising avenue for supporting college students' reading of multiple, componential texts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-134
Number of pages12
JournalLearning and Individual Differences
Volume65
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

biology
Reading
Students
Systems Integration
Endocrine System
student
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
integration strategy
comprehension
evidence

Keywords

  • Multiple texts
  • Self-reported strategy use
  • Text integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Inspiring integration in college students reading multiple biology texts. / Firetto, Carla; Van Meter, Peggy N.

In: Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 65, 01.07.2018, p. 123-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da0729bc43c5496787670978f1bcbd4a,
title = "Inspiring integration in college students reading multiple biology texts",
abstract = "College students often struggle when they are faced with situations where they are required to read multiple texts and integrate across them. The present study examines an integration task designed to stimulate cross-system integration for college biology students reading about two related physiological systems. Learners (n = 617) were randomly assigned to read about the endocrine and urinary systems in the form of either two separate texts or a single text as they completed one of three task conditions: an integration condition, a comprehension condition, or a comparison condition. After reading, learners completed a free recall test and these responses were scored for whether or not learners integrated between the two physiological systems. Findings revealed that learners who engaged in the condition designed to stimulate integration were statistically significantly more likely to have integrated than those in the two comparison conditions. In addition, learners who read about the systems in the format of a single text were statistically significantly more likely to integrate than those who read the texts separately. Learners' self-reported strategy use was also examined. Learners' integration strategy use mediated the impact of the integration condition on the integration outcome measure. In sum, there is evidence that the integration condition employed in this study is a promising avenue for supporting college students' reading of multiple, componential texts.",
keywords = "Multiple texts, Self-reported strategy use, Text integration",
author = "Carla Firetto and {Van Meter}, {Peggy N.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "123--134",
journal = "Learning and Individual Differences",
issn = "1041-6080",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inspiring integration in college students reading multiple biology texts

AU - Firetto, Carla

AU - Van Meter, Peggy N.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - College students often struggle when they are faced with situations where they are required to read multiple texts and integrate across them. The present study examines an integration task designed to stimulate cross-system integration for college biology students reading about two related physiological systems. Learners (n = 617) were randomly assigned to read about the endocrine and urinary systems in the form of either two separate texts or a single text as they completed one of three task conditions: an integration condition, a comprehension condition, or a comparison condition. After reading, learners completed a free recall test and these responses were scored for whether or not learners integrated between the two physiological systems. Findings revealed that learners who engaged in the condition designed to stimulate integration were statistically significantly more likely to have integrated than those in the two comparison conditions. In addition, learners who read about the systems in the format of a single text were statistically significantly more likely to integrate than those who read the texts separately. Learners' self-reported strategy use was also examined. Learners' integration strategy use mediated the impact of the integration condition on the integration outcome measure. In sum, there is evidence that the integration condition employed in this study is a promising avenue for supporting college students' reading of multiple, componential texts.

AB - College students often struggle when they are faced with situations where they are required to read multiple texts and integrate across them. The present study examines an integration task designed to stimulate cross-system integration for college biology students reading about two related physiological systems. Learners (n = 617) were randomly assigned to read about the endocrine and urinary systems in the form of either two separate texts or a single text as they completed one of three task conditions: an integration condition, a comprehension condition, or a comparison condition. After reading, learners completed a free recall test and these responses were scored for whether or not learners integrated between the two physiological systems. Findings revealed that learners who engaged in the condition designed to stimulate integration were statistically significantly more likely to have integrated than those in the two comparison conditions. In addition, learners who read about the systems in the format of a single text were statistically significantly more likely to integrate than those who read the texts separately. Learners' self-reported strategy use was also examined. Learners' integration strategy use mediated the impact of the integration condition on the integration outcome measure. In sum, there is evidence that the integration condition employed in this study is a promising avenue for supporting college students' reading of multiple, componential texts.

KW - Multiple texts

KW - Self-reported strategy use

KW - Text integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047725967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047725967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.011

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047725967

VL - 65

SP - 123

EP - 134

JO - Learning and Individual Differences

JF - Learning and Individual Differences

SN - 1041-6080

ER -