Influence of treatment preferences on validity: A review

Souraya Sidani, Joyal Miranda, Dana Epstein, Mary Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Random assignment of participants to experimental and comparison treatments is believed to enhance the comparability of the study groups on baseline characteristics. Despite its benefits, random assignment presents threats to validity. It ignores participants' treatment preferences. If not accounted for when participants are allocated to treatments, preferences influence enrolment in the study, representativeness of the accrued sample, attrition, adherence to treatment, and outcomes. This methodological article describes the mechanisms underlying the influence of treatment preferences on the external and internal validity of an intervention evaluation study. The authors present empirical evidence to support the points of discussion. They describe alternative research designs that account for treatment preferences, for use in future nursing intervention research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-67
Number of pages16
JournalCanadian Journal of Nursing Research
Volume41
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing Research
Research Design

Keywords

  • Partially randomized clinical trials
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Research designs
  • Threats to validity
  • Treatment preferences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Influence of treatment preferences on validity : A review. / Sidani, Souraya; Miranda, Joyal; Epstein, Dana; Fox, Mary.

In: Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.12.2009, p. 52-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Sidani, Souraya ; Miranda, Joyal ; Epstein, Dana ; Fox, Mary. / Influence of treatment preferences on validity : A review. In: Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2009 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 52-67.
@article{4b1bc84be38d41f482b25abe4720152c,
title = "Influence of treatment preferences on validity: A review",
abstract = "Random assignment of participants to experimental and comparison treatments is believed to enhance the comparability of the study groups on baseline characteristics. Despite its benefits, random assignment presents threats to validity. It ignores participants' treatment preferences. If not accounted for when participants are allocated to treatments, preferences influence enrolment in the study, representativeness of the accrued sample, attrition, adherence to treatment, and outcomes. This methodological article describes the mechanisms underlying the influence of treatment preferences on the external and internal validity of an intervention evaluation study. The authors present empirical evidence to support the points of discussion. They describe alternative research designs that account for treatment preferences, for use in future nursing intervention research.",
keywords = "Partially randomized clinical trials, Randomized clinical trial, Research designs, Threats to validity, Treatment preferences",
author = "Souraya Sidani and Joyal Miranda and Dana Epstein and Mary Fox",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "52--67",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Nursing Research",
issn = "0844-5621",
publisher = "McGill University, School fof Nursing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of treatment preferences on validity

T2 - A review

AU - Sidani, Souraya

AU - Miranda, Joyal

AU - Epstein, Dana

AU - Fox, Mary

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - Random assignment of participants to experimental and comparison treatments is believed to enhance the comparability of the study groups on baseline characteristics. Despite its benefits, random assignment presents threats to validity. It ignores participants' treatment preferences. If not accounted for when participants are allocated to treatments, preferences influence enrolment in the study, representativeness of the accrued sample, attrition, adherence to treatment, and outcomes. This methodological article describes the mechanisms underlying the influence of treatment preferences on the external and internal validity of an intervention evaluation study. The authors present empirical evidence to support the points of discussion. They describe alternative research designs that account for treatment preferences, for use in future nursing intervention research.

AB - Random assignment of participants to experimental and comparison treatments is believed to enhance the comparability of the study groups on baseline characteristics. Despite its benefits, random assignment presents threats to validity. It ignores participants' treatment preferences. If not accounted for when participants are allocated to treatments, preferences influence enrolment in the study, representativeness of the accrued sample, attrition, adherence to treatment, and outcomes. This methodological article describes the mechanisms underlying the influence of treatment preferences on the external and internal validity of an intervention evaluation study. The authors present empirical evidence to support the points of discussion. They describe alternative research designs that account for treatment preferences, for use in future nursing intervention research.

KW - Partially randomized clinical trials

KW - Randomized clinical trial

KW - Research designs

KW - Threats to validity

KW - Treatment preferences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74549151714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74549151714&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 20191713

AN - SCOPUS:74549151714

VL - 41

SP - 52

EP - 67

JO - Canadian Journal of Nursing Research

JF - Canadian Journal of Nursing Research

SN - 0844-5621

IS - 4

ER -