Impossibilities of reconciliation

Validity in mixed theory projects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article discusses how validity and truth claims, which are often based on singular theoretical and philosophical assumptions, are negotiated within qualitative research practices created at the intersection of two theoretical perspectives. The article asks, What are the possibilities and impossibilities of validity established within the discursive fields that form and shape mixed theory projects? More specifically, this article explores how mixed theory projects are theoretically and methodologically created and consequently, how shifting discourses shape the validity claims. The author argues that critical and deconstructive ethnography are both variations of the same theme. This theme is a part of a constellation that does not aim to unify theoretical perspectives; instead, it limits some of the dangers of Othering by promoting ways of knowing that escape normativity and essentializing discourses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-621
Number of pages21
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reconciliation
normativity
discourse
research practice
ethnography
qualitative research

Keywords

  • Ethnography
  • Mixed theory
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Impossibilities of reconciliation : Validity in mixed theory projects. / Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka.

In: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2004, p. 601-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9f1d090316446b7b6c412d437a4562c,
title = "Impossibilities of reconciliation: Validity in mixed theory projects",
abstract = "This article discusses how validity and truth claims, which are often based on singular theoretical and philosophical assumptions, are negotiated within qualitative research practices created at the intersection of two theoretical perspectives. The article asks, What are the possibilities and impossibilities of validity established within the discursive fields that form and shape mixed theory projects? More specifically, this article explores how mixed theory projects are theoretically and methodologically created and consequently, how shifting discourses shape the validity claims. The author argues that critical and deconstructive ethnography are both variations of the same theme. This theme is a part of a constellation that does not aim to unify theoretical perspectives; instead, it limits some of the dangers of Othering by promoting ways of knowing that escape normativity and essentializing discourses.",
keywords = "Ethnography, Mixed theory, Validity",
author = "Mirka Koro-Ljungberg",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1177/1077800403261860",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "601--621",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impossibilities of reconciliation

T2 - Validity in mixed theory projects

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This article discusses how validity and truth claims, which are often based on singular theoretical and philosophical assumptions, are negotiated within qualitative research practices created at the intersection of two theoretical perspectives. The article asks, What are the possibilities and impossibilities of validity established within the discursive fields that form and shape mixed theory projects? More specifically, this article explores how mixed theory projects are theoretically and methodologically created and consequently, how shifting discourses shape the validity claims. The author argues that critical and deconstructive ethnography are both variations of the same theme. This theme is a part of a constellation that does not aim to unify theoretical perspectives; instead, it limits some of the dangers of Othering by promoting ways of knowing that escape normativity and essentializing discourses.

AB - This article discusses how validity and truth claims, which are often based on singular theoretical and philosophical assumptions, are negotiated within qualitative research practices created at the intersection of two theoretical perspectives. The article asks, What are the possibilities and impossibilities of validity established within the discursive fields that form and shape mixed theory projects? More specifically, this article explores how mixed theory projects are theoretically and methodologically created and consequently, how shifting discourses shape the validity claims. The author argues that critical and deconstructive ethnography are both variations of the same theme. This theme is a part of a constellation that does not aim to unify theoretical perspectives; instead, it limits some of the dangers of Othering by promoting ways of knowing that escape normativity and essentializing discourses.

KW - Ethnography

KW - Mixed theory

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18144406322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18144406322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077800403261860

DO - 10.1177/1077800403261860

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 601

EP - 621

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

IS - 4

ER -