Implications of uncertainty on regional CO2 mitigation policies for the U.S. onroad sector based on a high-resolution emissions estimate

Daniel Mendoza, Kevin Gurney, Sarath Geethakumar, Vandhana Chandrasekaran, Yuyu Zhou, Igor Razlivanov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study we present onroad fossil fuel CO2 emissions estimated by the Vulcan Project, an effort quantifying fossil fuel CO2 emissions for the U.S. in high spatial and temporal resolution. This high-resolution data, aggregated at the state-level and classified in broad road and vehicle type categories, is compared to a commonly used national-average approach. We find that the use of national averages incurs state-level biases for road groupings that are almost twice as large as for vehicle groupings. The uncertainty for all groups exceeds the bias, and both quantities are positively correlated with total state emissions. States with the largest emissions totals are typically similar to one another in terms of emissions fraction distribution across road and vehicle groups, while smaller-emitting states have a wider range of variation in all groups. Uncertainties in reduction estimates as large as ±60% corresponding to ±0.2MtC are found for a national-average emissions mitigation strategy focused on a 10% emissions reduction from a single vehicle class, such as passenger gas vehicles or heavy diesel trucks. Recommendations are made for reducing CO2 emissions uncertainty by addressing its main drivers: VMT and fuel efficiency uncertainty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)386-395
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume55
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

mitigation
Fossil fuels
road
fossil fuel
Trucks
policy
Uncertainty
diesel
vehicle
Gases
gas

Keywords

  • Transportation CO emissions
  • Transportation emissions bias and uncertainty
  • Transportation sector policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Implications of uncertainty on regional CO2 mitigation policies for the U.S. onroad sector based on a high-resolution emissions estimate. / Mendoza, Daniel; Gurney, Kevin; Geethakumar, Sarath; Chandrasekaran, Vandhana; Zhou, Yuyu; Razlivanov, Igor.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 55, 04.2013, p. 386-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mendoza, Daniel ; Gurney, Kevin ; Geethakumar, Sarath ; Chandrasekaran, Vandhana ; Zhou, Yuyu ; Razlivanov, Igor. / Implications of uncertainty on regional CO2 mitigation policies for the U.S. onroad sector based on a high-resolution emissions estimate. In: Energy Policy. 2013 ; Vol. 55. pp. 386-395.
@article{1a464ccc0da84e4b9df495aaafb36dfd,
title = "Implications of uncertainty on regional CO2 mitigation policies for the U.S. onroad sector based on a high-resolution emissions estimate",
abstract = "In this study we present onroad fossil fuel CO2 emissions estimated by the Vulcan Project, an effort quantifying fossil fuel CO2 emissions for the U.S. in high spatial and temporal resolution. This high-resolution data, aggregated at the state-level and classified in broad road and vehicle type categories, is compared to a commonly used national-average approach. We find that the use of national averages incurs state-level biases for road groupings that are almost twice as large as for vehicle groupings. The uncertainty for all groups exceeds the bias, and both quantities are positively correlated with total state emissions. States with the largest emissions totals are typically similar to one another in terms of emissions fraction distribution across road and vehicle groups, while smaller-emitting states have a wider range of variation in all groups. Uncertainties in reduction estimates as large as ±60{\%} corresponding to ±0.2MtC are found for a national-average emissions mitigation strategy focused on a 10{\%} emissions reduction from a single vehicle class, such as passenger gas vehicles or heavy diesel trucks. Recommendations are made for reducing CO2 emissions uncertainty by addressing its main drivers: VMT and fuel efficiency uncertainty.",
keywords = "Transportation CO emissions, Transportation emissions bias and uncertainty, Transportation sector policy",
author = "Daniel Mendoza and Kevin Gurney and Sarath Geethakumar and Vandhana Chandrasekaran and Yuyu Zhou and Igor Razlivanov",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "386--395",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implications of uncertainty on regional CO2 mitigation policies for the U.S. onroad sector based on a high-resolution emissions estimate

AU - Mendoza, Daniel

AU - Gurney, Kevin

AU - Geethakumar, Sarath

AU - Chandrasekaran, Vandhana

AU - Zhou, Yuyu

AU - Razlivanov, Igor

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - In this study we present onroad fossil fuel CO2 emissions estimated by the Vulcan Project, an effort quantifying fossil fuel CO2 emissions for the U.S. in high spatial and temporal resolution. This high-resolution data, aggregated at the state-level and classified in broad road and vehicle type categories, is compared to a commonly used national-average approach. We find that the use of national averages incurs state-level biases for road groupings that are almost twice as large as for vehicle groupings. The uncertainty for all groups exceeds the bias, and both quantities are positively correlated with total state emissions. States with the largest emissions totals are typically similar to one another in terms of emissions fraction distribution across road and vehicle groups, while smaller-emitting states have a wider range of variation in all groups. Uncertainties in reduction estimates as large as ±60% corresponding to ±0.2MtC are found for a national-average emissions mitigation strategy focused on a 10% emissions reduction from a single vehicle class, such as passenger gas vehicles or heavy diesel trucks. Recommendations are made for reducing CO2 emissions uncertainty by addressing its main drivers: VMT and fuel efficiency uncertainty.

AB - In this study we present onroad fossil fuel CO2 emissions estimated by the Vulcan Project, an effort quantifying fossil fuel CO2 emissions for the U.S. in high spatial and temporal resolution. This high-resolution data, aggregated at the state-level and classified in broad road and vehicle type categories, is compared to a commonly used national-average approach. We find that the use of national averages incurs state-level biases for road groupings that are almost twice as large as for vehicle groupings. The uncertainty for all groups exceeds the bias, and both quantities are positively correlated with total state emissions. States with the largest emissions totals are typically similar to one another in terms of emissions fraction distribution across road and vehicle groups, while smaller-emitting states have a wider range of variation in all groups. Uncertainties in reduction estimates as large as ±60% corresponding to ±0.2MtC are found for a national-average emissions mitigation strategy focused on a 10% emissions reduction from a single vehicle class, such as passenger gas vehicles or heavy diesel trucks. Recommendations are made for reducing CO2 emissions uncertainty by addressing its main drivers: VMT and fuel efficiency uncertainty.

KW - Transportation CO emissions

KW - Transportation emissions bias and uncertainty

KW - Transportation sector policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873141386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873141386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.027

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.027

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 386

EP - 395

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -