Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data

J. N. Perry, A. M. Liebhold, M. S. Rosenberg, J. Dungan, M. Miriti, A. Jakomulska, S. Citron-Pousty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

315 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aims to provide guidance to ecologists with limited experience in spatial analysis to help in their choice of techniques. It uses examples to compare methods of spatial analysis for ecological field data. A taxonomy of different data types is presented, including point- and area-referenced data, with and without attributes. Spatially and non-spatially explicit data are distinguished. The effects of sampling and other transformations that convert one data type to another are discussed; the possible loss of spatial information is considered. Techniques for analyzing spatial pattern, developed in plant ecology, animal ecology, landscape ecology, geostatistics and applied statistics are reviewed briefly and their overlap in methodology and philosophy noted. The techniques are categorized according to their output and the inferences that may be drawn from them, in a discursive style without formulae. Methods are compared for four case studies with field data covering a range of types. These are: 1) percentage cover of three shrubs along a line transect; 2) locations and volume of a desert plant in a 1 ha area; 3) a remotely-sensed spectral index and elevation from 105 km2 of a mountainous region; and 4) land cover from three rangeland types within 800 km2 of a coastal region. Initial approaches utilize mapping, frequency distributions and variance-mean indices. Analysis techniques we compare include: local quadrat variance, block quadrat variance, correlograms, variograms, angular correlation, directional variograms, wavelets, SADIE, nearest neighbour methods, Ripley's L̂(t), and various landscape ecology metrics. Our advice to ecologists is to use simple visualization techniques for initial analysis, and subsequently to select methods that are appropriate for the data type and that answer their specific questions of interest. It is usually prudent to employ several different techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)578-600
Number of pages23
JournalEcography
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2002

Fingerprint

statistical analysis
landscape ecology
variogram
spatial analysis
methodology
ecologists
line transect
geostatistics
method
rangeland
wavelet
visualization
land cover
plant ecology
xerophytes
animal ecology
shrub
desert
rangelands
sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Perry, J. N., Liebhold, A. M., Rosenberg, M. S., Dungan, J., Miriti, M., Jakomulska, A., & Citron-Pousty, S. (2002). Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. Ecography, 25(5), 578-600. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250507.x

Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. / Perry, J. N.; Liebhold, A. M.; Rosenberg, M. S.; Dungan, J.; Miriti, M.; Jakomulska, A.; Citron-Pousty, S.

In: Ecography, Vol. 25, No. 5, 10.2002, p. 578-600.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perry, JN, Liebhold, AM, Rosenberg, MS, Dungan, J, Miriti, M, Jakomulska, A & Citron-Pousty, S 2002, 'Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data', Ecography, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 578-600. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250507.x
Perry, J. N. ; Liebhold, A. M. ; Rosenberg, M. S. ; Dungan, J. ; Miriti, M. ; Jakomulska, A. ; Citron-Pousty, S. / Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. In: Ecography. 2002 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 578-600.
@article{a5b7a800344346b4b1dd95ff6b053003,
title = "Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data",
abstract = "This paper aims to provide guidance to ecologists with limited experience in spatial analysis to help in their choice of techniques. It uses examples to compare methods of spatial analysis for ecological field data. A taxonomy of different data types is presented, including point- and area-referenced data, with and without attributes. Spatially and non-spatially explicit data are distinguished. The effects of sampling and other transformations that convert one data type to another are discussed; the possible loss of spatial information is considered. Techniques for analyzing spatial pattern, developed in plant ecology, animal ecology, landscape ecology, geostatistics and applied statistics are reviewed briefly and their overlap in methodology and philosophy noted. The techniques are categorized according to their output and the inferences that may be drawn from them, in a discursive style without formulae. Methods are compared for four case studies with field data covering a range of types. These are: 1) percentage cover of three shrubs along a line transect; 2) locations and volume of a desert plant in a 1 ha area; 3) a remotely-sensed spectral index and elevation from 105 km2 of a mountainous region; and 4) land cover from three rangeland types within 800 km2 of a coastal region. Initial approaches utilize mapping, frequency distributions and variance-mean indices. Analysis techniques we compare include: local quadrat variance, block quadrat variance, correlograms, variograms, angular correlation, directional variograms, wavelets, SADIE, nearest neighbour methods, Ripley's L̂(t), and various landscape ecology metrics. Our advice to ecologists is to use simple visualization techniques for initial analysis, and subsequently to select methods that are appropriate for the data type and that answer their specific questions of interest. It is usually prudent to employ several different techniques.",
author = "Perry, {J. N.} and Liebhold, {A. M.} and Rosenberg, {M. S.} and J. Dungan and M. Miriti and A. Jakomulska and S. Citron-Pousty",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250507.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "578--600",
journal = "Ecography",
issn = "0906-7590",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data

AU - Perry, J. N.

AU - Liebhold, A. M.

AU - Rosenberg, M. S.

AU - Dungan, J.

AU - Miriti, M.

AU - Jakomulska, A.

AU - Citron-Pousty, S.

PY - 2002/10

Y1 - 2002/10

N2 - This paper aims to provide guidance to ecologists with limited experience in spatial analysis to help in their choice of techniques. It uses examples to compare methods of spatial analysis for ecological field data. A taxonomy of different data types is presented, including point- and area-referenced data, with and without attributes. Spatially and non-spatially explicit data are distinguished. The effects of sampling and other transformations that convert one data type to another are discussed; the possible loss of spatial information is considered. Techniques for analyzing spatial pattern, developed in plant ecology, animal ecology, landscape ecology, geostatistics and applied statistics are reviewed briefly and their overlap in methodology and philosophy noted. The techniques are categorized according to their output and the inferences that may be drawn from them, in a discursive style without formulae. Methods are compared for four case studies with field data covering a range of types. These are: 1) percentage cover of three shrubs along a line transect; 2) locations and volume of a desert plant in a 1 ha area; 3) a remotely-sensed spectral index and elevation from 105 km2 of a mountainous region; and 4) land cover from three rangeland types within 800 km2 of a coastal region. Initial approaches utilize mapping, frequency distributions and variance-mean indices. Analysis techniques we compare include: local quadrat variance, block quadrat variance, correlograms, variograms, angular correlation, directional variograms, wavelets, SADIE, nearest neighbour methods, Ripley's L̂(t), and various landscape ecology metrics. Our advice to ecologists is to use simple visualization techniques for initial analysis, and subsequently to select methods that are appropriate for the data type and that answer their specific questions of interest. It is usually prudent to employ several different techniques.

AB - This paper aims to provide guidance to ecologists with limited experience in spatial analysis to help in their choice of techniques. It uses examples to compare methods of spatial analysis for ecological field data. A taxonomy of different data types is presented, including point- and area-referenced data, with and without attributes. Spatially and non-spatially explicit data are distinguished. The effects of sampling and other transformations that convert one data type to another are discussed; the possible loss of spatial information is considered. Techniques for analyzing spatial pattern, developed in plant ecology, animal ecology, landscape ecology, geostatistics and applied statistics are reviewed briefly and their overlap in methodology and philosophy noted. The techniques are categorized according to their output and the inferences that may be drawn from them, in a discursive style without formulae. Methods are compared for four case studies with field data covering a range of types. These are: 1) percentage cover of three shrubs along a line transect; 2) locations and volume of a desert plant in a 1 ha area; 3) a remotely-sensed spectral index and elevation from 105 km2 of a mountainous region; and 4) land cover from three rangeland types within 800 km2 of a coastal region. Initial approaches utilize mapping, frequency distributions and variance-mean indices. Analysis techniques we compare include: local quadrat variance, block quadrat variance, correlograms, variograms, angular correlation, directional variograms, wavelets, SADIE, nearest neighbour methods, Ripley's L̂(t), and various landscape ecology metrics. Our advice to ecologists is to use simple visualization techniques for initial analysis, and subsequently to select methods that are appropriate for the data type and that answer their specific questions of interest. It is usually prudent to employ several different techniques.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036779386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036779386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250507.x

DO - 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250507.x

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 578

EP - 600

JO - Ecography

JF - Ecography

SN - 0906-7590

IS - 5

ER -