TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying interactive biological pathways associated with reading disability
AU - Lancaster, Hope Sparks
AU - Liu, Xiaonan
AU - Dinu, Valentin
AU - Li, Jing
N1 - Funding Information:
We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists, and nurses. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors, and they will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding (PDF, 459KB, http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant‐acknowledgements.pdf ) is available on the ALSPAC website. The first author was supported by a National Institutes of Health F32 postdoctoral training grant (1F32HD089674‐01A1; PI: Hope Sparks Lancaster). GWAS data were generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe.
Funding Information:
We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists, and nurses. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors, and they will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding (PDF, 459KB, http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf) is available on the ALSPAC website. The first author was supported by a National Institutes of Health F32 postdoctoral training grant (1F32HD089674-01A1; PI: Hope Sparks Lancaster). GWAS data were generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Introduction: Past research has suggested that reading disability is a complex disorder involving genetic and environment contributions, as well as gene–gene and gene–environment interaction, but to date little is known about the underlying mechanisms. Method: Using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, we assessed the contributions of genetic, demographic, and environmental variables on case–control status using machine learning. We investigated the functional interactions between genes using pathway and network analysis. Results: Our results support a systems approach to studying the etiology of reading disability with many genes (e.g., RAPGEF2, KIAA0319, DLC1) and biological pathways (e.g., neuron migration, positive regulation of dendrite regulation, nervous system development) interacting with each other. We found that single nucleotide variants within genes often had opposite effects and that enriched biological pathways were mediated by neuron migration. We also identified behavioral (i.e., receptive language, nonverbal intelligence, and vocabulary), demographic (i.e., mother's highest education), and environmental (i.e., birthweight) factors that influenced case–control status when accounting for genetic information. Discussion: The behavioral and demographic factors were suggested to be protective against reading disability status, while birthweight conveyed risk. We provided supporting evidence that reading disability has a complex biological and environmental etiology and that there may be a shared genetic and neurobiological architecture for reading (dis)ability.
AB - Introduction: Past research has suggested that reading disability is a complex disorder involving genetic and environment contributions, as well as gene–gene and gene–environment interaction, but to date little is known about the underlying mechanisms. Method: Using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, we assessed the contributions of genetic, demographic, and environmental variables on case–control status using machine learning. We investigated the functional interactions between genes using pathway and network analysis. Results: Our results support a systems approach to studying the etiology of reading disability with many genes (e.g., RAPGEF2, KIAA0319, DLC1) and biological pathways (e.g., neuron migration, positive regulation of dendrite regulation, nervous system development) interacting with each other. We found that single nucleotide variants within genes often had opposite effects and that enriched biological pathways were mediated by neuron migration. We also identified behavioral (i.e., receptive language, nonverbal intelligence, and vocabulary), demographic (i.e., mother's highest education), and environmental (i.e., birthweight) factors that influenced case–control status when accounting for genetic information. Discussion: The behavioral and demographic factors were suggested to be protective against reading disability status, while birthweight conveyed risk. We provided supporting evidence that reading disability has a complex biological and environmental etiology and that there may be a shared genetic and neurobiological architecture for reading (dis)ability.
KW - cognition
KW - development
KW - genetics
KW - informatics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087143052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087143052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/brb3.1735
DO - 10.1002/brb3.1735
M3 - Article
C2 - 32596987
AN - SCOPUS:85087143052
SN - 2157-9032
VL - 10
JO - Brain and Behavior
JF - Brain and Behavior
IS - 8
M1 - e01735
ER -