Household and community transmission of the Asian influenza A (H2N2) and influenza B viruses in 1957 and 1961

Hiroshi Nishiura, Gerardo Chowell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study analyzed the distribution of the number of cases in households of various sizes, reconsidering previous survey data from the Asian influenza A (H2N2) pandemic in 1957 and the influenza B epidemic in 1961. The final size distributions for the number of household cases were extracted from four different data sources (n = 547, 671, 92 and 263 households), and a probability model was applied to estimate the community probability of infection (CPI) and household secondary attack rate (SAR). For the 1957 Asian influenza pandemic, the CPI and household SAR were estimated to be 0.42 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.37, 0.47] and 7.06% (95% CI: 4.73, 9.44), respectively, using data from Tokyo. The figures for the same pandemic using data from Osaka were 0.21 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.22) and 9.07% (95% CI: 6.73, 11.53), respectively. Similarly, the CPI and household SAR for two different datasets of influenza B epidemics in Osaka in 1961 were estimated as 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.44) and 18.41% (95% CI: 11.37, 25.95) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.28) and 10.51% (95% CI: 8.01, 13.15), respectively. Community transmission was more frequent than household transmission, both for the Asian influenza pandemic and the influenza B epidemic, implying that community-based countermeasures (eg, area quarantine and social distancing) may play key roles in influenza interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1075-1083
Number of pages9
JournalSoutheast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health
Volume38
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Influenza B virus
Human Influenza
Confidence Intervals
Pandemics
Coinfection
Quarantine
Tokyo
Information Storage and Retrieval

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Household and community transmission of the Asian influenza A (H2N2) and influenza B viruses in 1957 and 1961. / Nishiura, Hiroshi; Chowell, Gerardo.

In: Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 38, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 1075-1083.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f82023c7c464611bcda5c023ca969a8,
title = "Household and community transmission of the Asian influenza A (H2N2) and influenza B viruses in 1957 and 1961",
abstract = "This study analyzed the distribution of the number of cases in households of various sizes, reconsidering previous survey data from the Asian influenza A (H2N2) pandemic in 1957 and the influenza B epidemic in 1961. The final size distributions for the number of household cases were extracted from four different data sources (n = 547, 671, 92 and 263 households), and a probability model was applied to estimate the community probability of infection (CPI) and household secondary attack rate (SAR). For the 1957 Asian influenza pandemic, the CPI and household SAR were estimated to be 0.42 [95{\%} confidence intervals (CI): 0.37, 0.47] and 7.06{\%} (95{\%} CI: 4.73, 9.44), respectively, using data from Tokyo. The figures for the same pandemic using data from Osaka were 0.21 (95{\%} CI: 0.19, 0.22) and 9.07{\%} (95{\%} CI: 6.73, 11.53), respectively. Similarly, the CPI and household SAR for two different datasets of influenza B epidemics in Osaka in 1961 were estimated as 0.37 (95{\%} CI: 0.30, 0.44) and 18.41{\%} (95{\%} CI: 11.37, 25.95) and 0.20 (95{\%} CI: 0.13, 0.28) and 10.51{\%} (95{\%} CI: 8.01, 13.15), respectively. Community transmission was more frequent than household transmission, both for the Asian influenza pandemic and the influenza B epidemic, implying that community-based countermeasures (eg, area quarantine and social distancing) may play key roles in influenza interventions.",
author = "Hiroshi Nishiura and Gerardo Chowell",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1075--1083",
journal = "Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health",
issn = "0125-1562",
publisher = "Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organisation",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Household and community transmission of the Asian influenza A (H2N2) and influenza B viruses in 1957 and 1961

AU - Nishiura, Hiroshi

AU - Chowell, Gerardo

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - This study analyzed the distribution of the number of cases in households of various sizes, reconsidering previous survey data from the Asian influenza A (H2N2) pandemic in 1957 and the influenza B epidemic in 1961. The final size distributions for the number of household cases were extracted from four different data sources (n = 547, 671, 92 and 263 households), and a probability model was applied to estimate the community probability of infection (CPI) and household secondary attack rate (SAR). For the 1957 Asian influenza pandemic, the CPI and household SAR were estimated to be 0.42 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.37, 0.47] and 7.06% (95% CI: 4.73, 9.44), respectively, using data from Tokyo. The figures for the same pandemic using data from Osaka were 0.21 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.22) and 9.07% (95% CI: 6.73, 11.53), respectively. Similarly, the CPI and household SAR for two different datasets of influenza B epidemics in Osaka in 1961 were estimated as 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.44) and 18.41% (95% CI: 11.37, 25.95) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.28) and 10.51% (95% CI: 8.01, 13.15), respectively. Community transmission was more frequent than household transmission, both for the Asian influenza pandemic and the influenza B epidemic, implying that community-based countermeasures (eg, area quarantine and social distancing) may play key roles in influenza interventions.

AB - This study analyzed the distribution of the number of cases in households of various sizes, reconsidering previous survey data from the Asian influenza A (H2N2) pandemic in 1957 and the influenza B epidemic in 1961. The final size distributions for the number of household cases were extracted from four different data sources (n = 547, 671, 92 and 263 households), and a probability model was applied to estimate the community probability of infection (CPI) and household secondary attack rate (SAR). For the 1957 Asian influenza pandemic, the CPI and household SAR were estimated to be 0.42 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.37, 0.47] and 7.06% (95% CI: 4.73, 9.44), respectively, using data from Tokyo. The figures for the same pandemic using data from Osaka were 0.21 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.22) and 9.07% (95% CI: 6.73, 11.53), respectively. Similarly, the CPI and household SAR for two different datasets of influenza B epidemics in Osaka in 1961 were estimated as 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.44) and 18.41% (95% CI: 11.37, 25.95) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.28) and 10.51% (95% CI: 8.01, 13.15), respectively. Community transmission was more frequent than household transmission, both for the Asian influenza pandemic and the influenza B epidemic, implying that community-based countermeasures (eg, area quarantine and social distancing) may play key roles in influenza interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849023088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849023088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1075

EP - 1083

JO - Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

JF - Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

SN - 0125-1562

IS - 6

ER -