Historiography and forensic analysis of the Fort King George "skull": Craniometric assessment using the specific population approach

Christopher Stojanowski, William N. Duncan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we evaluate the association between the Fort King George "skull" and two Franciscans who were killed during a Guale revolt in 1597 and whose remains were never recovered (Pedro de Corpa and Francisco de Veráscola). The history and historiography of the revolt is summarized to generate a forensic profile for the individuals. The calvaria is described in terms of preservation, taphonomy, possible trauma, age, and sex. Because these factors are consistent with the individuals in question, population affinity is assessed using comparative craniometric analysis. In response to recent criticism of the typological nature of forensic population affinity assessment, we use a population specific approach, as advocated by Alice Brues (1992). Archaeological and historical data inform the occupation history of the site, and data from those specific populations are used in the comparative analysis. Results of linear discriminant function analysis indicate a low probability that the calvaria is a Guale (the precontact inhabitants of southeastern Georgia) or an individual of African descent. Comparison among European and Euro-American populations indicated poor discriminatory resolution; however, the closest match suggests a New World affinity rather than an Old World English, Scottish, or Iberian affinity for the specimen. Future analyses that will provide greater resolution about the identity of the calvaria are outlined. The case highlights the unique challenges of historical forensics cases relative to those of traditional jurisprudence, as well as the potential for using historiography to overcome those challenges in future analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-289
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume140
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Historiography
skull
historiography
Skull
Population
revolt
taphonomy
history
jurisprudence
occupation
monastic order
Jurisprudence
Discriminant Analysis
Occupations
discriminant analysis
inhabitant
trauma
criticism
History
analysis

Keywords

  • Craniometry
  • Forensic anthropology
  • Population affinity
  • Southeastern United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Anatomy
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

@article{305a68a310814201a2a26fcffcc81797,
title = "Historiography and forensic analysis of the Fort King George {"}skull{"}: Craniometric assessment using the specific population approach",
abstract = "In this article, we evaluate the association between the Fort King George {"}skull{"} and two Franciscans who were killed during a Guale revolt in 1597 and whose remains were never recovered (Pedro de Corpa and Francisco de Ver{\'a}scola). The history and historiography of the revolt is summarized to generate a forensic profile for the individuals. The calvaria is described in terms of preservation, taphonomy, possible trauma, age, and sex. Because these factors are consistent with the individuals in question, population affinity is assessed using comparative craniometric analysis. In response to recent criticism of the typological nature of forensic population affinity assessment, we use a population specific approach, as advocated by Alice Brues (1992). Archaeological and historical data inform the occupation history of the site, and data from those specific populations are used in the comparative analysis. Results of linear discriminant function analysis indicate a low probability that the calvaria is a Guale (the precontact inhabitants of southeastern Georgia) or an individual of African descent. Comparison among European and Euro-American populations indicated poor discriminatory resolution; however, the closest match suggests a New World affinity rather than an Old World English, Scottish, or Iberian affinity for the specimen. Future analyses that will provide greater resolution about the identity of the calvaria are outlined. The case highlights the unique challenges of historical forensics cases relative to those of traditional jurisprudence, as well as the potential for using historiography to overcome those challenges in future analyses.",
keywords = "Craniometry, Forensic anthropology, Population affinity, Southeastern United States",
author = "Christopher Stojanowski and Duncan, {William N.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.21067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "275--289",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Historiography and forensic analysis of the Fort King George "skull"

T2 - Craniometric assessment using the specific population approach

AU - Stojanowski, Christopher

AU - Duncan, William N.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - In this article, we evaluate the association between the Fort King George "skull" and two Franciscans who were killed during a Guale revolt in 1597 and whose remains were never recovered (Pedro de Corpa and Francisco de Veráscola). The history and historiography of the revolt is summarized to generate a forensic profile for the individuals. The calvaria is described in terms of preservation, taphonomy, possible trauma, age, and sex. Because these factors are consistent with the individuals in question, population affinity is assessed using comparative craniometric analysis. In response to recent criticism of the typological nature of forensic population affinity assessment, we use a population specific approach, as advocated by Alice Brues (1992). Archaeological and historical data inform the occupation history of the site, and data from those specific populations are used in the comparative analysis. Results of linear discriminant function analysis indicate a low probability that the calvaria is a Guale (the precontact inhabitants of southeastern Georgia) or an individual of African descent. Comparison among European and Euro-American populations indicated poor discriminatory resolution; however, the closest match suggests a New World affinity rather than an Old World English, Scottish, or Iberian affinity for the specimen. Future analyses that will provide greater resolution about the identity of the calvaria are outlined. The case highlights the unique challenges of historical forensics cases relative to those of traditional jurisprudence, as well as the potential for using historiography to overcome those challenges in future analyses.

AB - In this article, we evaluate the association between the Fort King George "skull" and two Franciscans who were killed during a Guale revolt in 1597 and whose remains were never recovered (Pedro de Corpa and Francisco de Veráscola). The history and historiography of the revolt is summarized to generate a forensic profile for the individuals. The calvaria is described in terms of preservation, taphonomy, possible trauma, age, and sex. Because these factors are consistent with the individuals in question, population affinity is assessed using comparative craniometric analysis. In response to recent criticism of the typological nature of forensic population affinity assessment, we use a population specific approach, as advocated by Alice Brues (1992). Archaeological and historical data inform the occupation history of the site, and data from those specific populations are used in the comparative analysis. Results of linear discriminant function analysis indicate a low probability that the calvaria is a Guale (the precontact inhabitants of southeastern Georgia) or an individual of African descent. Comparison among European and Euro-American populations indicated poor discriminatory resolution; however, the closest match suggests a New World affinity rather than an Old World English, Scottish, or Iberian affinity for the specimen. Future analyses that will provide greater resolution about the identity of the calvaria are outlined. The case highlights the unique challenges of historical forensics cases relative to those of traditional jurisprudence, as well as the potential for using historiography to overcome those challenges in future analyses.

KW - Craniometry

KW - Forensic anthropology

KW - Population affinity

KW - Southeastern United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349124256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349124256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.21067

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.21067

M3 - Article

C2 - 19373845

AN - SCOPUS:70349124256

VL - 140

SP - 275

EP - 289

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 2

ER -