High stakes testing and expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities: A five-year study of one district

Ann C. Schulte, Diane N. Villwock, S. Michelle Whichard, Cheryl F. Stallings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act contain provisions designed to increase the participation of children in special education in general education standards-based reform and accountability programs. The reading scores of 461 students with learning disabilities in a single district were followed across 5 years as the district implemented a state-mandated accountability plan and large scale testing program. The accountability program included grade-level proficiency standards for students and cash incentives for school staff to increase student growth. Student growth was assessed with a regression-based growth formula based on the typical progress of students across a school year at each grade. The district's performance with students with learning disabilities improved in terms of mean reading score and percent proficient in reading in elementary school across the 5 years. State standards for growth established in general education appeared to offer a challenging, but achievable, goal for special education services at the district level. However, measurement issues limit the use of growth standards at the school or individual level. The combination of large scale assessment and curriculum-based data linked to the large scale assessments offers the advantage of reliable and valid continuous progress measures for students in special education keyed to the higher expectations for performance and progress within general education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-506
Number of pages20
JournalSchool Psychology Review
Volume30
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
district
Students
Special Education
Social Responsibility
special education
student
Education
Growth
Reading
general education
responsibility
school
education standards
Curriculum
performance
amendment
elementary school
Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

High stakes testing and expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities : A five-year study of one district. / Schulte, Ann C.; Villwock, Diane N.; Whichard, S. Michelle; Stallings, Cheryl F.

In: School Psychology Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2001, p. 487-506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schulte, Ann C. ; Villwock, Diane N. ; Whichard, S. Michelle ; Stallings, Cheryl F. / High stakes testing and expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities : A five-year study of one district. In: School Psychology Review. 2001 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 487-506.
@article{d92d5416b4cc4a04bdfe1f0017e4fd83,
title = "High stakes testing and expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities: A five-year study of one district",
abstract = "The 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act contain provisions designed to increase the participation of children in special education in general education standards-based reform and accountability programs. The reading scores of 461 students with learning disabilities in a single district were followed across 5 years as the district implemented a state-mandated accountability plan and large scale testing program. The accountability program included grade-level proficiency standards for students and cash incentives for school staff to increase student growth. Student growth was assessed with a regression-based growth formula based on the typical progress of students across a school year at each grade. The district's performance with students with learning disabilities improved in terms of mean reading score and percent proficient in reading in elementary school across the 5 years. State standards for growth established in general education appeared to offer a challenging, but achievable, goal for special education services at the district level. However, measurement issues limit the use of growth standards at the school or individual level. The combination of large scale assessment and curriculum-based data linked to the large scale assessments offers the advantage of reliable and valid continuous progress measures for students in special education keyed to the higher expectations for performance and progress within general education.",
author = "Schulte, {Ann C.} and Villwock, {Diane N.} and Whichard, {S. Michelle} and Stallings, {Cheryl F.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "487--506",
journal = "School Psychology Review",
issn = "0279-6015",
publisher = "National Association of School Psychologists",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High stakes testing and expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities

T2 - A five-year study of one district

AU - Schulte, Ann C.

AU - Villwock, Diane N.

AU - Whichard, S. Michelle

AU - Stallings, Cheryl F.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act contain provisions designed to increase the participation of children in special education in general education standards-based reform and accountability programs. The reading scores of 461 students with learning disabilities in a single district were followed across 5 years as the district implemented a state-mandated accountability plan and large scale testing program. The accountability program included grade-level proficiency standards for students and cash incentives for school staff to increase student growth. Student growth was assessed with a regression-based growth formula based on the typical progress of students across a school year at each grade. The district's performance with students with learning disabilities improved in terms of mean reading score and percent proficient in reading in elementary school across the 5 years. State standards for growth established in general education appeared to offer a challenging, but achievable, goal for special education services at the district level. However, measurement issues limit the use of growth standards at the school or individual level. The combination of large scale assessment and curriculum-based data linked to the large scale assessments offers the advantage of reliable and valid continuous progress measures for students in special education keyed to the higher expectations for performance and progress within general education.

AB - The 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act contain provisions designed to increase the participation of children in special education in general education standards-based reform and accountability programs. The reading scores of 461 students with learning disabilities in a single district were followed across 5 years as the district implemented a state-mandated accountability plan and large scale testing program. The accountability program included grade-level proficiency standards for students and cash incentives for school staff to increase student growth. Student growth was assessed with a regression-based growth formula based on the typical progress of students across a school year at each grade. The district's performance with students with learning disabilities improved in terms of mean reading score and percent proficient in reading in elementary school across the 5 years. State standards for growth established in general education appeared to offer a challenging, but achievable, goal for special education services at the district level. However, measurement issues limit the use of growth standards at the school or individual level. The combination of large scale assessment and curriculum-based data linked to the large scale assessments offers the advantage of reliable and valid continuous progress measures for students in special education keyed to the higher expectations for performance and progress within general education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035567788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035567788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035567788

VL - 30

SP - 487

EP - 506

JO - School Psychology Review

JF - School Psychology Review

SN - 0279-6015

IS - 4

ER -