High-stakes accountability and equity: Using evidence from California's public schools accountability act to address the issues in Williams v. State of California

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In May 2000, a class action lawsuit on behalf of California's public school students, Williams v. State of California, was filed in state court in an effort to make the state address inequities in its public schools. The central issue of the case was students' access to the "bare essentials" of public education: qualified teachers, current textbooks, and adequate and safe facilities. The author analyzes the relationship between school and district characteristics and the base year of the Academic Performance Index (API), the state's main measure of school performance, focusing on variables related to the main issues in the Williams case. The findings support the plaintiffs' arguments that the basic educational necessities targeted by the case should be the object of state policy in conjunction with accountability policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)763-795
Number of pages33
JournalAmerican Educational Research Journal
Volume41
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

equity
responsibility
school
evidence
lawsuit
public education
performance
textbook
student
district
teacher

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Equity
  • School-finance litigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

@article{051321da481d4f6c988e84e59c72ade1,
title = "High-stakes accountability and equity: Using evidence from California's public schools accountability act to address the issues in Williams v. State of California",
abstract = "In May 2000, a class action lawsuit on behalf of California's public school students, Williams v. State of California, was filed in state court in an effort to make the state address inequities in its public schools. The central issue of the case was students' access to the {"}bare essentials{"} of public education: qualified teachers, current textbooks, and adequate and safe facilities. The author analyzes the relationship between school and district characteristics and the base year of the Academic Performance Index (API), the state's main measure of school performance, focusing on variables related to the main issues in the Williams case. The findings support the plaintiffs' arguments that the basic educational necessities targeted by the case should be the object of state policy in conjunction with accountability policies.",
keywords = "Accountability, Equity, School-finance litigation",
author = "Jeanne Powers",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "763--795",
journal = "American Educational Research Journal",
issn = "0002-8312",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-stakes accountability and equity

T2 - Using evidence from California's public schools accountability act to address the issues in Williams v. State of California

AU - Powers, Jeanne

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - In May 2000, a class action lawsuit on behalf of California's public school students, Williams v. State of California, was filed in state court in an effort to make the state address inequities in its public schools. The central issue of the case was students' access to the "bare essentials" of public education: qualified teachers, current textbooks, and adequate and safe facilities. The author analyzes the relationship between school and district characteristics and the base year of the Academic Performance Index (API), the state's main measure of school performance, focusing on variables related to the main issues in the Williams case. The findings support the plaintiffs' arguments that the basic educational necessities targeted by the case should be the object of state policy in conjunction with accountability policies.

AB - In May 2000, a class action lawsuit on behalf of California's public school students, Williams v. State of California, was filed in state court in an effort to make the state address inequities in its public schools. The central issue of the case was students' access to the "bare essentials" of public education: qualified teachers, current textbooks, and adequate and safe facilities. The author analyzes the relationship between school and district characteristics and the base year of the Academic Performance Index (API), the state's main measure of school performance, focusing on variables related to the main issues in the Williams case. The findings support the plaintiffs' arguments that the basic educational necessities targeted by the case should be the object of state policy in conjunction with accountability policies.

KW - Accountability

KW - Equity

KW - School-finance litigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14944355105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14944355105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:14944355105

VL - 41

SP - 763

EP - 795

JO - American Educational Research Journal

JF - American Educational Research Journal

SN - 0002-8312

IS - 4

ER -