'Good Impression' as a Moderator in Employment-related Assessment

Richard I. Lanyon, Leonard D. Goodstein, Rebecca Wershba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There is widespread agreement that response bias variables, such as good impression, have little relevance, either as moderators or suppressors, in efforts to improve the accuracy of employment-related predictions based on personality test scores. However, a recent review found that there were relatively few methodologically sound real-life studies of the moderator function. Reported here are four such studies involving the prediction of job performance. As hypothesized, a significant moderator effect was shown in the two studies that utilized 'transparent' job-related predictors, with useful prediction only at the lower levels of good impression, but not in the two studies that utilized personality variables as predictors. These results confirm that validity when using transparent items to predict employment-related success can be affected by the operation of good-impression response bias. Further research is needed to delineate other relevant effects of good impression in such situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Moderators
Personality Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Personality
Research
Acoustic waves
Prediction
Moderator
Response bias
Predictors
Work Performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

'Good Impression' as a Moderator in Employment-related Assessment. / Lanyon, Richard I.; Goodstein, Leonard D.; Wershba, Rebecca.

In: International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 1, 03.2014, p. 52-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lanyon, Richard I. ; Goodstein, Leonard D. ; Wershba, Rebecca. / 'Good Impression' as a Moderator in Employment-related Assessment. In: International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2014 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 52-61.
@article{4373d9a801294b118653f7378c1c62f6,
title = "'Good Impression' as a Moderator in Employment-related Assessment",
abstract = "There is widespread agreement that response bias variables, such as good impression, have little relevance, either as moderators or suppressors, in efforts to improve the accuracy of employment-related predictions based on personality test scores. However, a recent review found that there were relatively few methodologically sound real-life studies of the moderator function. Reported here are four such studies involving the prediction of job performance. As hypothesized, a significant moderator effect was shown in the two studies that utilized 'transparent' job-related predictors, with useful prediction only at the lower levels of good impression, but not in the two studies that utilized personality variables as predictors. These results confirm that validity when using transparent items to predict employment-related success can be affected by the operation of good-impression response bias. Further research is needed to delineate other relevant effects of good impression in such situations.",
author = "Lanyon, {Richard I.} and Goodstein, {Leonard D.} and Rebecca Wershba",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/ijsa.12056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "52--61",
journal = "International Journal of Selection and Assessment",
issn = "0965-075X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Good Impression' as a Moderator in Employment-related Assessment

AU - Lanyon, Richard I.

AU - Goodstein, Leonard D.

AU - Wershba, Rebecca

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - There is widespread agreement that response bias variables, such as good impression, have little relevance, either as moderators or suppressors, in efforts to improve the accuracy of employment-related predictions based on personality test scores. However, a recent review found that there were relatively few methodologically sound real-life studies of the moderator function. Reported here are four such studies involving the prediction of job performance. As hypothesized, a significant moderator effect was shown in the two studies that utilized 'transparent' job-related predictors, with useful prediction only at the lower levels of good impression, but not in the two studies that utilized personality variables as predictors. These results confirm that validity when using transparent items to predict employment-related success can be affected by the operation of good-impression response bias. Further research is needed to delineate other relevant effects of good impression in such situations.

AB - There is widespread agreement that response bias variables, such as good impression, have little relevance, either as moderators or suppressors, in efforts to improve the accuracy of employment-related predictions based on personality test scores. However, a recent review found that there were relatively few methodologically sound real-life studies of the moderator function. Reported here are four such studies involving the prediction of job performance. As hypothesized, a significant moderator effect was shown in the two studies that utilized 'transparent' job-related predictors, with useful prediction only at the lower levels of good impression, but not in the two studies that utilized personality variables as predictors. These results confirm that validity when using transparent items to predict employment-related success can be affected by the operation of good-impression response bias. Further research is needed to delineate other relevant effects of good impression in such situations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894074432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894074432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijsa.12056

DO - 10.1111/ijsa.12056

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 52

EP - 61

JO - International Journal of Selection and Assessment

JF - International Journal of Selection and Assessment

SN - 0965-075X

IS - 1

ER -