Abstract

The concept of social license to operate was forged in the crucible between globalization-which has radically decentralized the ability of organizations to operate wherever they choose-and the rise of oppositional social movements, newly empowered to confront global actors infringing on their communities. This article reviews the central dilemma posed by social license to operate: whether it is business practice, sociological reality, or emerging form of governance, drawing on the insights and findings of the articles in this special issue. It then suggests three lines of future research for the critical social sciences. The article concludes that the principle shortcomings of the concept of social license to operate is the inevitability of the boundaries it draws between organizations and the communities they inhabit and the failure of the concept to acknowledge that transformation, not just operation, is almost always at stake in these encounters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)385-392
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Epistemology
Volume28
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

license
globalization
Social Movements
community
social science
governance
ability
Globalization
Social Sciences
Crucible
Governance
Rise

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Globalization
  • Governance
  • Social License to Operate
  • Social Movement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Globalization and Discontent. / Miller, Clark.

In: Social Epistemology, Vol. 28, No. 3-4, 2014, p. 385-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Clark. / Globalization and Discontent. In: Social Epistemology. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 3-4. pp. 385-392.
@article{183dea8684924aa19d6c46406e1f3944,
title = "Globalization and Discontent",
abstract = "The concept of social license to operate was forged in the crucible between globalization-which has radically decentralized the ability of organizations to operate wherever they choose-and the rise of oppositional social movements, newly empowered to confront global actors infringing on their communities. This article reviews the central dilemma posed by social license to operate: whether it is business practice, sociological reality, or emerging form of governance, drawing on the insights and findings of the articles in this special issue. It then suggests three lines of future research for the critical social sciences. The article concludes that the principle shortcomings of the concept of social license to operate is the inevitability of the boundaries it draws between organizations and the communities they inhabit and the failure of the concept to acknowledge that transformation, not just operation, is almost always at stake in these encounters.",
keywords = "Democracy, Globalization, Governance, Social License to Operate, Social Movement",
author = "Clark Miller",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/02691728.2014.922643",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "385--392",
journal = "Social Epistemology",
issn = "0269-1728",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Globalization and Discontent

AU - Miller, Clark

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The concept of social license to operate was forged in the crucible between globalization-which has radically decentralized the ability of organizations to operate wherever they choose-and the rise of oppositional social movements, newly empowered to confront global actors infringing on their communities. This article reviews the central dilemma posed by social license to operate: whether it is business practice, sociological reality, or emerging form of governance, drawing on the insights and findings of the articles in this special issue. It then suggests three lines of future research for the critical social sciences. The article concludes that the principle shortcomings of the concept of social license to operate is the inevitability of the boundaries it draws between organizations and the communities they inhabit and the failure of the concept to acknowledge that transformation, not just operation, is almost always at stake in these encounters.

AB - The concept of social license to operate was forged in the crucible between globalization-which has radically decentralized the ability of organizations to operate wherever they choose-and the rise of oppositional social movements, newly empowered to confront global actors infringing on their communities. This article reviews the central dilemma posed by social license to operate: whether it is business practice, sociological reality, or emerging form of governance, drawing on the insights and findings of the articles in this special issue. It then suggests three lines of future research for the critical social sciences. The article concludes that the principle shortcomings of the concept of social license to operate is the inevitability of the boundaries it draws between organizations and the communities they inhabit and the failure of the concept to acknowledge that transformation, not just operation, is almost always at stake in these encounters.

KW - Democracy

KW - Globalization

KW - Governance

KW - Social License to Operate

KW - Social Movement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905369031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905369031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02691728.2014.922643

DO - 10.1080/02691728.2014.922643

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84905369031

VL - 28

SP - 385

EP - 392

JO - Social Epistemology

JF - Social Epistemology

SN - 0269-1728

IS - 3-4

ER -