Genetic risk by experience interaction for childhood internalizing problems

Converging evidence across multiple methods

Matthew K. Vendlinski, Kathryn Lemery, Marilyn J. Essex, H. Hill Goldsmith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Identifying how genetic risk interacts with experience to predict psychopathology is an important step toward understanding the etiology of mental health problems. Few studies have examined genetic risk by experience interaction (G×E) in the development of childhood psychopathology. Methods: We used both co-twin and parent mental health as markers of genetic risk to test whether G×E predicted internalizing problems in a sample of 8-year-old twins. Multi-instrument composites were used to characterize both parent and child psychopathology, and five experiential risk factors (socioeconomic status, single parent upbringing, negative parent-child interactions, number of negative life events, negative impact of negative life events) composed a cumulative risk index. Results: We found consistent evidence for G×E for child internalizing problems, with significant interaction effects emerging both when genetic risk was indexed by co-twin mental health and when it was based on parent mental health. When co-twin mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, child internalizing problems were more heritable for children at low rather than high experiential risk. When parent mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, the association between genetic risk and internalizing problems was stronger for children at elevated experiential risk. Consideration of the interaction effect sizes helps to reconcile these findings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the processes involved in both diathesis-stress and bioecological models of development may operate for child internalizing problems. Effect sizes indicated that the main effects of genetic and experiential risk were much better predictors of child internalizing problems than was their interaction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-618
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Psychopathology
Single Parent
Disease Susceptibility
Genetic Markers
Social Class

Keywords

  • childhood psychopathology
  • Gene-environment interaction
  • internalizing problems
  • parental psychopathology
  • twins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Genetic risk by experience interaction for childhood internalizing problems : Converging evidence across multiple methods. / Vendlinski, Matthew K.; Lemery, Kathryn; Essex, Marilyn J.; Goldsmith, H. Hill.

In: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, Vol. 52, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 607-618.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9464a7532ad4682b0f8dd168570722a,
title = "Genetic risk by experience interaction for childhood internalizing problems: Converging evidence across multiple methods",
abstract = "Background: Identifying how genetic risk interacts with experience to predict psychopathology is an important step toward understanding the etiology of mental health problems. Few studies have examined genetic risk by experience interaction (G×E) in the development of childhood psychopathology. Methods: We used both co-twin and parent mental health as markers of genetic risk to test whether G×E predicted internalizing problems in a sample of 8-year-old twins. Multi-instrument composites were used to characterize both parent and child psychopathology, and five experiential risk factors (socioeconomic status, single parent upbringing, negative parent-child interactions, number of negative life events, negative impact of negative life events) composed a cumulative risk index. Results: We found consistent evidence for G×E for child internalizing problems, with significant interaction effects emerging both when genetic risk was indexed by co-twin mental health and when it was based on parent mental health. When co-twin mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, child internalizing problems were more heritable for children at low rather than high experiential risk. When parent mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, the association between genetic risk and internalizing problems was stronger for children at elevated experiential risk. Consideration of the interaction effect sizes helps to reconcile these findings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the processes involved in both diathesis-stress and bioecological models of development may operate for child internalizing problems. Effect sizes indicated that the main effects of genetic and experiential risk were much better predictors of child internalizing problems than was their interaction.",
keywords = "childhood psychopathology, Gene-environment interaction, internalizing problems, parental psychopathology, twins",
author = "Vendlinski, {Matthew K.} and Kathryn Lemery and Essex, {Marilyn J.} and Goldsmith, {H. Hill}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02343.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "607--618",
journal = "Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines",
issn = "0021-9630",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic risk by experience interaction for childhood internalizing problems

T2 - Converging evidence across multiple methods

AU - Vendlinski, Matthew K.

AU - Lemery, Kathryn

AU - Essex, Marilyn J.

AU - Goldsmith, H. Hill

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Background: Identifying how genetic risk interacts with experience to predict psychopathology is an important step toward understanding the etiology of mental health problems. Few studies have examined genetic risk by experience interaction (G×E) in the development of childhood psychopathology. Methods: We used both co-twin and parent mental health as markers of genetic risk to test whether G×E predicted internalizing problems in a sample of 8-year-old twins. Multi-instrument composites were used to characterize both parent and child psychopathology, and five experiential risk factors (socioeconomic status, single parent upbringing, negative parent-child interactions, number of negative life events, negative impact of negative life events) composed a cumulative risk index. Results: We found consistent evidence for G×E for child internalizing problems, with significant interaction effects emerging both when genetic risk was indexed by co-twin mental health and when it was based on parent mental health. When co-twin mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, child internalizing problems were more heritable for children at low rather than high experiential risk. When parent mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, the association between genetic risk and internalizing problems was stronger for children at elevated experiential risk. Consideration of the interaction effect sizes helps to reconcile these findings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the processes involved in both diathesis-stress and bioecological models of development may operate for child internalizing problems. Effect sizes indicated that the main effects of genetic and experiential risk were much better predictors of child internalizing problems than was their interaction.

AB - Background: Identifying how genetic risk interacts with experience to predict psychopathology is an important step toward understanding the etiology of mental health problems. Few studies have examined genetic risk by experience interaction (G×E) in the development of childhood psychopathology. Methods: We used both co-twin and parent mental health as markers of genetic risk to test whether G×E predicted internalizing problems in a sample of 8-year-old twins. Multi-instrument composites were used to characterize both parent and child psychopathology, and five experiential risk factors (socioeconomic status, single parent upbringing, negative parent-child interactions, number of negative life events, negative impact of negative life events) composed a cumulative risk index. Results: We found consistent evidence for G×E for child internalizing problems, with significant interaction effects emerging both when genetic risk was indexed by co-twin mental health and when it was based on parent mental health. When co-twin mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, child internalizing problems were more heritable for children at low rather than high experiential risk. When parent mental health was used to estimate genetic risk, the association between genetic risk and internalizing problems was stronger for children at elevated experiential risk. Consideration of the interaction effect sizes helps to reconcile these findings. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the processes involved in both diathesis-stress and bioecological models of development may operate for child internalizing problems. Effect sizes indicated that the main effects of genetic and experiential risk were much better predictors of child internalizing problems than was their interaction.

KW - childhood psychopathology

KW - Gene-environment interaction

KW - internalizing problems

KW - parental psychopathology

KW - twins

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954601997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954601997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02343.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02343.x

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 607

EP - 618

JO - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

JF - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines

SN - 0021-9630

IS - 5

ER -