TY - JOUR
T1 - From things to processes
T2 - A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts
AU - Chi, Michelene T.H.
AU - Slotta, James D.
AU - De Leeuw, Nicholas
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements - Preparation of this article was supported by a grant from the A. F. Mellon Foundation. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the position of the sponsoring agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - Conceptual change occurs when a concept is reassigned from one category to another. The theory of conceptual change in this article explains why some kinds of conceptual change, or category shifts, are more difficult than others. The theory assumes that entities in the world belong to different ontological categories, such as MATTER (things) and PROCESSES. Many scientific concepts, for example light, belong in a subcategory of PROCESSES, which we call constraint-based interactions. However, students' initial conceptions of these concepts are categorized as MATTER. The ontological status of the initial and scientific conceptions determines the difficulty of learning. If the two conceptions are ontologically compatible (e.g., both are MATTER), conceptual change is easy. If the two conceptions are ontologically distinct, learning is difficult. Evidence for these two cases is presented from studies of learning about the human circulatory system and about key physics concepts, such as heat and light.
AB - Conceptual change occurs when a concept is reassigned from one category to another. The theory of conceptual change in this article explains why some kinds of conceptual change, or category shifts, are more difficult than others. The theory assumes that entities in the world belong to different ontological categories, such as MATTER (things) and PROCESSES. Many scientific concepts, for example light, belong in a subcategory of PROCESSES, which we call constraint-based interactions. However, students' initial conceptions of these concepts are categorized as MATTER. The ontological status of the initial and scientific conceptions determines the difficulty of learning. If the two conceptions are ontologically compatible (e.g., both are MATTER), conceptual change is easy. If the two conceptions are ontologically distinct, learning is difficult. Evidence for these two cases is presented from studies of learning about the human circulatory system and about key physics concepts, such as heat and light.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0003150291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0003150291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
DO - 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0003150291
SN - 0959-4752
VL - 4
SP - 27
EP - 43
JO - Learning and Instruction
JF - Learning and Instruction
IS - 1
ER -