Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis

Stephen Graham, Michael Hebert, Karen Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine whether formative writing assessments that are directly tied to everyday classroom teaching and learning enhance students’ writing performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of true and quasi-experiments conducted with students in grades 1 to 8. We found that feedback to students about writing from adults, peers, self, and computers statistically enhanced writing quality, yielding average weighted effect sizes of 0.87, 0.58, 0.62, and 0.38, respectively. We did not find, however, that teachers’ monitoring of students’ writing progress or implementation of the 6 + 1 Trait Writing model meaningfully enhanced students’ writing. The findings from this meta-analysis provide support for the use of formative writing assessments that provide feedback directly to students as part of everyday teaching and learning. We argue that such assessments should be used more frequently by teachers, and that they should play a stronger role in the Next-Generation Assessment Systems being developed by Smarter Balanced and PARCC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-547
Number of pages25
JournalElementary School Journal
Volume115
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2015

Fingerprint

student
Teaching
teacher
learning
school grade
monitoring
classroom
experiment
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Formative assessment and writing : A meta-analysis. / Graham, Stephen; Hebert, Michael; Harris, Karen.

In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 115, No. 4, 02.07.2015, p. 523-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82aeaf1c8bae4daa99098a2d5f31745a,
title = "Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "To determine whether formative writing assessments that are directly tied to everyday classroom teaching and learning enhance students’ writing performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of true and quasi-experiments conducted with students in grades 1 to 8. We found that feedback to students about writing from adults, peers, self, and computers statistically enhanced writing quality, yielding average weighted effect sizes of 0.87, 0.58, 0.62, and 0.38, respectively. We did not find, however, that teachers’ monitoring of students’ writing progress or implementation of the 6 + 1 Trait Writing model meaningfully enhanced students’ writing. The findings from this meta-analysis provide support for the use of formative writing assessments that provide feedback directly to students as part of everyday teaching and learning. We argue that such assessments should be used more frequently by teachers, and that they should play a stronger role in the Next-Generation Assessment Systems being developed by Smarter Balanced and PARCC.",
author = "Stephen Graham and Michael Hebert and Karen Harris",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1086/681947",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "523--547",
journal = "Elementary School Journal",
issn = "0013-5984",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Formative assessment and writing

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Graham, Stephen

AU - Hebert, Michael

AU - Harris, Karen

PY - 2015/7/2

Y1 - 2015/7/2

N2 - To determine whether formative writing assessments that are directly tied to everyday classroom teaching and learning enhance students’ writing performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of true and quasi-experiments conducted with students in grades 1 to 8. We found that feedback to students about writing from adults, peers, self, and computers statistically enhanced writing quality, yielding average weighted effect sizes of 0.87, 0.58, 0.62, and 0.38, respectively. We did not find, however, that teachers’ monitoring of students’ writing progress or implementation of the 6 + 1 Trait Writing model meaningfully enhanced students’ writing. The findings from this meta-analysis provide support for the use of formative writing assessments that provide feedback directly to students as part of everyday teaching and learning. We argue that such assessments should be used more frequently by teachers, and that they should play a stronger role in the Next-Generation Assessment Systems being developed by Smarter Balanced and PARCC.

AB - To determine whether formative writing assessments that are directly tied to everyday classroom teaching and learning enhance students’ writing performance, we conducted a meta-analysis of true and quasi-experiments conducted with students in grades 1 to 8. We found that feedback to students about writing from adults, peers, self, and computers statistically enhanced writing quality, yielding average weighted effect sizes of 0.87, 0.58, 0.62, and 0.38, respectively. We did not find, however, that teachers’ monitoring of students’ writing progress or implementation of the 6 + 1 Trait Writing model meaningfully enhanced students’ writing. The findings from this meta-analysis provide support for the use of formative writing assessments that provide feedback directly to students as part of everyday teaching and learning. We argue that such assessments should be used more frequently by teachers, and that they should play a stronger role in the Next-Generation Assessment Systems being developed by Smarter Balanced and PARCC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934760983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934760983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/681947

DO - 10.1086/681947

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84934760983

VL - 115

SP - 523

EP - 547

JO - Elementary School Journal

JF - Elementary School Journal

SN - 0013-5984

IS - 4

ER -