Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers?

Elizabeth Corley, Meghna Sabharwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported that the number of doctoral degrees awarded in the U.S. rose 3.4 percent in 2004, largely because of an increase in foreign students [Smallwood (2005). Doctoral degrees rose 3.4% in 2004, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 9, 2005]. Currently, 20.9 percent [National Science Board (2003). The science and engineering workforce realizing America's potential. NSB, vol. 3, National Science Foundation] of all science and engineering faculty positions at U.S. universities are held by foreign-born scientists (with even larger percentages in computer science and engineering)-and we can expect higher numbers of foreign-born faculty at U.S. universities in the future. In this paper, we use 2001 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) data from the National Science Foundation to compare productivity levels, work satisfaction levels and career trajectories of foreign-born scientists and U.S.-born scientists. The results indicate that foreign-born academic scientists and engineers are more productive than their U.S.-born peers in all areas. Yet, average salaries and work satisfaction levels for foreign-born scientists are lower than for U.S.-born scientists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)909-940
Number of pages32
JournalResearch in Higher Education
Volume48
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Keywords

  • Foreign-born
  • Publication productivity
  • Research policy
  • Science policy
  • Scientific productivity
  • Survey
  • Work satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this