Feasibility of School-Based ADHD Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions of Adolescents and Adults

Regina Bussing, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, Joseph Calvin Gagnon, Dana M. Mason, Anne Ellison, Kenji Noguchi, Cynthia W. Garvan, Dolores Albarracin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about perceptions surrounding academic interventions for ADHD that determine intervention feasibility. Method: As part of a longitudinal mixed-methods research project, representative school district samples of 148 adolescents (54.8%), 161 parents (59.4%), 122 teachers (50.0%), 46 health care providers (53.5%), and 92 school health professionals (65.7%) completed a cross-sectional survey. They also answered open-ended questions addressing undesirable intervention effects, which were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Results: Adolescents expressed significantly lower receptivity toward academic interventions than adult respondents. Stigma emerged as a significant threat to ADHD intervention feasibility, as did perceptions that individualized interventions foster inequality. Conclusion: Findings suggest that adolescents’ viewpoints must be included in intervention development to enhance feasibility and avoid interventions acceptable to adults, but resisted by adolescents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-413
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Attention Disorders
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • academic
  • adolescent ADHD
  • parent–teacher agreement
  • stigma
  • treatment acceptability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility of School-Based ADHD Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions of Adolescents and Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this