Feasibility of School-Based ADHD Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions of Adolescents and Adults

Regina Bussing, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, Joseph Calvin Gagnon, Dana M. Mason, Anne Ellison, Kenji Noguchi, Cynthia W. Garvan, Dolores Albarracin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Little is known about perceptions surrounding academic interventions for ADHD that determine intervention feasibility. Method: As part of a longitudinal mixed-methods research project, representative school district samples of 148 adolescents (54.8%), 161 parents (59.4%), 122 teachers (50.0%), 46 health care providers (53.5%), and 92 school health professionals (65.7%) completed a cross-sectional survey. They also answered open-ended questions addressing undesirable intervention effects, which were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Results: Adolescents expressed significantly lower receptivity toward academic interventions than adult respondents. Stigma emerged as a significant threat to ADHD intervention feasibility, as did perceptions that individualized interventions foster inequality. Conclusion: Findings suggest that adolescents’ viewpoints must be included in intervention development to enhance feasibility and avoid interventions acceptable to adults, but resisted by adolescents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-413
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Attention Disorders
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

School Health Services
Health Personnel
Cross-Sectional Studies
Parents
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Grounded Theory

Keywords

  • academic
  • adolescent ADHD
  • parent–teacher agreement
  • stigma
  • treatment acceptability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Feasibility of School-Based ADHD Interventions : A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions of Adolescents and Adults. / Bussing, Regina; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Gagnon, Joseph Calvin; Mason, Dana M.; Ellison, Anne; Noguchi, Kenji; Garvan, Cynthia W.; Albarracin, Dolores.

In: Journal of Attention Disorders, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2012, p. 400-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bussing, Regina ; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka ; Gagnon, Joseph Calvin ; Mason, Dana M. ; Ellison, Anne ; Noguchi, Kenji ; Garvan, Cynthia W. ; Albarracin, Dolores. / Feasibility of School-Based ADHD Interventions : A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions of Adolescents and Adults. In: Journal of Attention Disorders. 2012 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 400-413.
@article{9f4de3f8ee1b4eb4baec9b9086ff5a64,
title = "Feasibility of School-Based ADHD Interventions: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions of Adolescents and Adults",
abstract = "Objective: Little is known about perceptions surrounding academic interventions for ADHD that determine intervention feasibility. Method: As part of a longitudinal mixed-methods research project, representative school district samples of 148 adolescents (54.8{\%}), 161 parents (59.4{\%}), 122 teachers (50.0{\%}), 46 health care providers (53.5{\%}), and 92 school health professionals (65.7{\%}) completed a cross-sectional survey. They also answered open-ended questions addressing undesirable intervention effects, which were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Results: Adolescents expressed significantly lower receptivity toward academic interventions than adult respondents. Stigma emerged as a significant threat to ADHD intervention feasibility, as did perceptions that individualized interventions foster inequality. Conclusion: Findings suggest that adolescents’ viewpoints must be included in intervention development to enhance feasibility and avoid interventions acceptable to adults, but resisted by adolescents.",
keywords = "academic, adolescent ADHD, parent–teacher agreement, stigma, treatment acceptability",
author = "Regina Bussing and Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Gagnon, {Joseph Calvin} and Mason, {Dana M.} and Anne Ellison and Kenji Noguchi and Garvan, {Cynthia W.} and Dolores Albarracin",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/1087054713515747",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "400--413",
journal = "Journal of Attention Disorders",
issn = "1087-0547",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of School-Based ADHD Interventions

T2 - A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions of Adolescents and Adults

AU - Bussing, Regina

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Gagnon, Joseph Calvin

AU - Mason, Dana M.

AU - Ellison, Anne

AU - Noguchi, Kenji

AU - Garvan, Cynthia W.

AU - Albarracin, Dolores

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objective: Little is known about perceptions surrounding academic interventions for ADHD that determine intervention feasibility. Method: As part of a longitudinal mixed-methods research project, representative school district samples of 148 adolescents (54.8%), 161 parents (59.4%), 122 teachers (50.0%), 46 health care providers (53.5%), and 92 school health professionals (65.7%) completed a cross-sectional survey. They also answered open-ended questions addressing undesirable intervention effects, which were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Results: Adolescents expressed significantly lower receptivity toward academic interventions than adult respondents. Stigma emerged as a significant threat to ADHD intervention feasibility, as did perceptions that individualized interventions foster inequality. Conclusion: Findings suggest that adolescents’ viewpoints must be included in intervention development to enhance feasibility and avoid interventions acceptable to adults, but resisted by adolescents.

AB - Objective: Little is known about perceptions surrounding academic interventions for ADHD that determine intervention feasibility. Method: As part of a longitudinal mixed-methods research project, representative school district samples of 148 adolescents (54.8%), 161 parents (59.4%), 122 teachers (50.0%), 46 health care providers (53.5%), and 92 school health professionals (65.7%) completed a cross-sectional survey. They also answered open-ended questions addressing undesirable intervention effects, which were analyzed using grounded theory methods. Results: Adolescents expressed significantly lower receptivity toward academic interventions than adult respondents. Stigma emerged as a significant threat to ADHD intervention feasibility, as did perceptions that individualized interventions foster inequality. Conclusion: Findings suggest that adolescents’ viewpoints must be included in intervention development to enhance feasibility and avoid interventions acceptable to adults, but resisted by adolescents.

KW - academic

KW - adolescent ADHD

KW - parent–teacher agreement

KW - stigma

KW - treatment acceptability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963567642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963567642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1087054713515747

DO - 10.1177/1087054713515747

M3 - Article

C2 - 24448222

AN - SCOPUS:84963567642

VL - 20

SP - 400

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Attention Disorders

JF - Journal of Attention Disorders

SN - 1087-0547

IS - 5

ER -