Extreme Speech, Public Order, and Democracy: Lessons from The Masses

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter attempts to identify a core free speech principle that must be respected in any democratic society and against which the free speech restrictions can be measured. It argues that two essential components of democracy - popular sovereignty and the individual right of political participation - generate a right of every citizen to participate in the discussion by which public opinion is formed. It concludes that this core norm was breached in Hammond v. DPP, and arguably violated in Norwood v. DPP. These two decisions and the precedent that they follow render insecure the right of British citizens to voice views that offend dominant opinion. The chapter suggests several reasons for this state of affairs, including the British judiciary's view that free speech is instrumental to, rather than constitutive of, democracy, and the excessive deference afforded lower court findings in free speech cases. These mistakes are remarkably similar to those made by the U.S. Supreme Court when it first started to develop free speech doctrine in the early 20th century.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationExtreme Speech and Democracy
    PublisherOxford University Press
    ISBN (Print)9780191720673, 9780199548781
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2009

    Fingerprint

    democracy
    citizen
    judiciary
    political participation
    sovereignty
    public opinion
    doctrine
    Supreme Court

    Keywords

    • Core free speech principle
    • Democracy
    • Hammond v. DPP
    • Norwood v. DPP
    • Political participation
    • Popular sovereignty
    • Public opinion

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Extreme Speech, Public Order, and Democracy : Lessons from The Masses. / Weinstein, James.

    Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2009.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Weinstein, James. / Extreme Speech, Public Order, and Democracy : Lessons from The Masses. Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2009.
    @inbook{9ab525692220433289cb9c297de89218,
    title = "Extreme Speech, Public Order, and Democracy: Lessons from The Masses",
    abstract = "This chapter attempts to identify a core free speech principle that must be respected in any democratic society and against which the free speech restrictions can be measured. It argues that two essential components of democracy - popular sovereignty and the individual right of political participation - generate a right of every citizen to participate in the discussion by which public opinion is formed. It concludes that this core norm was breached in Hammond v. DPP, and arguably violated in Norwood v. DPP. These two decisions and the precedent that they follow render insecure the right of British citizens to voice views that offend dominant opinion. The chapter suggests several reasons for this state of affairs, including the British judiciary's view that free speech is instrumental to, rather than constitutive of, democracy, and the excessive deference afforded lower court findings in free speech cases. These mistakes are remarkably similar to those made by the U.S. Supreme Court when it first started to develop free speech doctrine in the early 20th century.",
    keywords = "Core free speech principle, Democracy, Hammond v. DPP, Norwood v. DPP, Political participation, Popular sovereignty, Public opinion",
    author = "James Weinstein",
    year = "2009",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0003",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780191720673",
    booktitle = "Extreme Speech and Democracy",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Extreme Speech, Public Order, and Democracy

    T2 - Lessons from The Masses

    AU - Weinstein, James

    PY - 2009/5/1

    Y1 - 2009/5/1

    N2 - This chapter attempts to identify a core free speech principle that must be respected in any democratic society and against which the free speech restrictions can be measured. It argues that two essential components of democracy - popular sovereignty and the individual right of political participation - generate a right of every citizen to participate in the discussion by which public opinion is formed. It concludes that this core norm was breached in Hammond v. DPP, and arguably violated in Norwood v. DPP. These two decisions and the precedent that they follow render insecure the right of British citizens to voice views that offend dominant opinion. The chapter suggests several reasons for this state of affairs, including the British judiciary's view that free speech is instrumental to, rather than constitutive of, democracy, and the excessive deference afforded lower court findings in free speech cases. These mistakes are remarkably similar to those made by the U.S. Supreme Court when it first started to develop free speech doctrine in the early 20th century.

    AB - This chapter attempts to identify a core free speech principle that must be respected in any democratic society and against which the free speech restrictions can be measured. It argues that two essential components of democracy - popular sovereignty and the individual right of political participation - generate a right of every citizen to participate in the discussion by which public opinion is formed. It concludes that this core norm was breached in Hammond v. DPP, and arguably violated in Norwood v. DPP. These two decisions and the precedent that they follow render insecure the right of British citizens to voice views that offend dominant opinion. The chapter suggests several reasons for this state of affairs, including the British judiciary's view that free speech is instrumental to, rather than constitutive of, democracy, and the excessive deference afforded lower court findings in free speech cases. These mistakes are remarkably similar to those made by the U.S. Supreme Court when it first started to develop free speech doctrine in the early 20th century.

    KW - Core free speech principle

    KW - Democracy

    KW - Hammond v. DPP

    KW - Norwood v. DPP

    KW - Political participation

    KW - Popular sovereignty

    KW - Public opinion

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908911628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908911628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0003

    DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0003

    M3 - Chapter

    AN - SCOPUS:84908911628

    SN - 9780191720673

    SN - 9780199548781

    BT - Extreme Speech and Democracy

    PB - Oxford University Press

    ER -