TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining Body-Worn Camera Integration and Acceptance Among Police Officers, Citizens, and External Stakeholders
AU - White, Michael D.
AU - Todak, Natalie
AU - Gaub, Janne E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Society of Criminology
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Research Summary: We explore integration and acceptance of body-worn cameras (BWCs) among police, citizens, and stakeholders in one jurisdiction (Tempe, AZ) that adhered to the U.S. Department of Justice's (U.S. DOJ's) BWC Implementation Guide. We assess integration and acceptance through (a) officer surveys pre- and postdeployment, (b) interviews with citizens who had recent police encounters, and (c) interviews with external stakeholders. We also analyze (d) officer self-initiated contacts, (e) misdemeanor court case time to disposition, and (f) case outcomes. We found high levels of BWC acceptance across all groups. Officer proactivity remained consistent. Time-to-case disposition and the rate of guilty outcomes both trended in positive directions. Policy Implications: Although the results of early research on BWCs showed positive impacts, the findings from recent studies have been mixed. Implementation difficulties may explain the mixed results. Planning, implementation, and management of a BWC program are complex undertakings requiring significant resources. The technology also generates controversy, so the risk of implementation failure is substantial. The findings from our study demonstrate that adherence to the U.S. DOJ BWC Implementation Guide can lead to high levels of integration and acceptance among key stakeholders.
AB - Research Summary: We explore integration and acceptance of body-worn cameras (BWCs) among police, citizens, and stakeholders in one jurisdiction (Tempe, AZ) that adhered to the U.S. Department of Justice's (U.S. DOJ's) BWC Implementation Guide. We assess integration and acceptance through (a) officer surveys pre- and postdeployment, (b) interviews with citizens who had recent police encounters, and (c) interviews with external stakeholders. We also analyze (d) officer self-initiated contacts, (e) misdemeanor court case time to disposition, and (f) case outcomes. We found high levels of BWC acceptance across all groups. Officer proactivity remained consistent. Time-to-case disposition and the rate of guilty outcomes both trended in positive directions. Policy Implications: Although the results of early research on BWCs showed positive impacts, the findings from recent studies have been mixed. Implementation difficulties may explain the mixed results. Planning, implementation, and management of a BWC program are complex undertakings requiring significant resources. The technology also generates controversy, so the risk of implementation failure is substantial. The findings from our study demonstrate that adherence to the U.S. DOJ BWC Implementation Guide can lead to high levels of integration and acceptance among key stakeholders.
KW - body-worn cameras
KW - police
KW - police and stakeholders
KW - police technology
KW - program implementation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050629962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050629962&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1745-9133.12376
DO - 10.1111/1745-9133.12376
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050629962
SN - 1538-6473
VL - 17
SP - 649
EP - 677
JO - Criminology & Public Policy
JF - Criminology & Public Policy
IS - 3
ER -