Examining Body-Worn Camera Integration and Acceptance Among Police Officers, Citizens, and External Stakeholders

Michael White, Natalie Todak, Janne E. Gaub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research Summary: We explore integration and acceptance of body-worn cameras (BWCs) among police, citizens, and stakeholders in one jurisdiction (Tempe, AZ) that adhered to the U.S. Department of Justice's (U.S. DOJ's) BWC Implementation Guide. We assess integration and acceptance through (a) officer surveys pre- and postdeployment, (b) interviews with citizens who had recent police encounters, and (c) interviews with external stakeholders. We also analyze (d) officer self-initiated contacts, (e) misdemeanor court case time to disposition, and (f) case outcomes. We found high levels of BWC acceptance across all groups. Officer proactivity remained consistent. Time-to-case disposition and the rate of guilty outcomes both trended in positive directions. Policy Implications: Although the results of early research on BWCs showed positive impacts, the findings from recent studies have been mixed. Implementation difficulties may explain the mixed results. Planning, implementation, and management of a BWC program are complex undertakings requiring significant resources. The technology also generates controversy, so the risk of implementation failure is substantial. The findings from our study demonstrate that adherence to the U.S. DOJ BWC Implementation Guide can lead to high levels of integration and acceptance among key stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)649-677
Number of pages29
JournalCriminology and Public Policy
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

police officer
acceptance
stakeholder
citizen
disposition
police
misdemeanor
interview
Police
Stakeholders
Acceptance
jurisdiction
justice
contact
planning
management
resources
Group

Keywords

  • body-worn cameras
  • police
  • police and stakeholders
  • police technology
  • program implementation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

Examining Body-Worn Camera Integration and Acceptance Among Police Officers, Citizens, and External Stakeholders. / White, Michael; Todak, Natalie; Gaub, Janne E.

In: Criminology and Public Policy, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.08.2018, p. 649-677.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a37dd43d22644d21aebdee6b5b9173c0,
title = "Examining Body-Worn Camera Integration and Acceptance Among Police Officers, Citizens, and External Stakeholders",
abstract = "Research Summary: We explore integration and acceptance of body-worn cameras (BWCs) among police, citizens, and stakeholders in one jurisdiction (Tempe, AZ) that adhered to the U.S. Department of Justice's (U.S. DOJ's) BWC Implementation Guide. We assess integration and acceptance through (a) officer surveys pre- and postdeployment, (b) interviews with citizens who had recent police encounters, and (c) interviews with external stakeholders. We also analyze (d) officer self-initiated contacts, (e) misdemeanor court case time to disposition, and (f) case outcomes. We found high levels of BWC acceptance across all groups. Officer proactivity remained consistent. Time-to-case disposition and the rate of guilty outcomes both trended in positive directions. Policy Implications: Although the results of early research on BWCs showed positive impacts, the findings from recent studies have been mixed. Implementation difficulties may explain the mixed results. Planning, implementation, and management of a BWC program are complex undertakings requiring significant resources. The technology also generates controversy, so the risk of implementation failure is substantial. The findings from our study demonstrate that adherence to the U.S. DOJ BWC Implementation Guide can lead to high levels of integration and acceptance among key stakeholders.",
keywords = "body-worn cameras, police, police and stakeholders, police technology, program implementation",
author = "Michael White and Natalie Todak and Gaub, {Janne E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9133.12376",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "649--677",
journal = "Criminology & Public Policy",
issn = "1538-6473",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining Body-Worn Camera Integration and Acceptance Among Police Officers, Citizens, and External Stakeholders

AU - White, Michael

AU - Todak, Natalie

AU - Gaub, Janne E.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Research Summary: We explore integration and acceptance of body-worn cameras (BWCs) among police, citizens, and stakeholders in one jurisdiction (Tempe, AZ) that adhered to the U.S. Department of Justice's (U.S. DOJ's) BWC Implementation Guide. We assess integration and acceptance through (a) officer surveys pre- and postdeployment, (b) interviews with citizens who had recent police encounters, and (c) interviews with external stakeholders. We also analyze (d) officer self-initiated contacts, (e) misdemeanor court case time to disposition, and (f) case outcomes. We found high levels of BWC acceptance across all groups. Officer proactivity remained consistent. Time-to-case disposition and the rate of guilty outcomes both trended in positive directions. Policy Implications: Although the results of early research on BWCs showed positive impacts, the findings from recent studies have been mixed. Implementation difficulties may explain the mixed results. Planning, implementation, and management of a BWC program are complex undertakings requiring significant resources. The technology also generates controversy, so the risk of implementation failure is substantial. The findings from our study demonstrate that adherence to the U.S. DOJ BWC Implementation Guide can lead to high levels of integration and acceptance among key stakeholders.

AB - Research Summary: We explore integration and acceptance of body-worn cameras (BWCs) among police, citizens, and stakeholders in one jurisdiction (Tempe, AZ) that adhered to the U.S. Department of Justice's (U.S. DOJ's) BWC Implementation Guide. We assess integration and acceptance through (a) officer surveys pre- and postdeployment, (b) interviews with citizens who had recent police encounters, and (c) interviews with external stakeholders. We also analyze (d) officer self-initiated contacts, (e) misdemeanor court case time to disposition, and (f) case outcomes. We found high levels of BWC acceptance across all groups. Officer proactivity remained consistent. Time-to-case disposition and the rate of guilty outcomes both trended in positive directions. Policy Implications: Although the results of early research on BWCs showed positive impacts, the findings from recent studies have been mixed. Implementation difficulties may explain the mixed results. Planning, implementation, and management of a BWC program are complex undertakings requiring significant resources. The technology also generates controversy, so the risk of implementation failure is substantial. The findings from our study demonstrate that adherence to the U.S. DOJ BWC Implementation Guide can lead to high levels of integration and acceptance among key stakeholders.

KW - body-worn cameras

KW - police

KW - police and stakeholders

KW - police technology

KW - program implementation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050629962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050629962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9133.12376

DO - 10.1111/1745-9133.12376

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 649

EP - 677

JO - Criminology & Public Policy

JF - Criminology & Public Policy

SN - 1538-6473

IS - 3

ER -