Evidence-based preventive intervention for preadolescent aggressive children: One-year outcomes following randomization to group versus individual delivery

John E. Lochman, Thomas J. Dishion, Nicole P. Powell, Caroline L. Boxmeyer, Lixin Qu, Meghann Sallee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Some research suggests that group interventions with antisocial youth may, on occasion, have iatrogenic effects. This is the first study to test the effects of group versus individual delivery of evidence-based intervention for aggressive children. Method: Three hundred sixty fourth-grade children were randomly assigned by school to group coping power (GCP) or individual coping power (ICP). Longitudinal assessments of teacher and parent reports of behavior (Behavior Assessment System for Children [BASC]; Peer Affiliation and Social Acceptance [PASA]) were collected from baseline through a 1-year follow-up. Results: Growth curve analyses revealed that children in both conditions reduced teacher- and parent-reported externalizing behavior problems and internalizing behavior problems by the end of the 1-year follow-up. However, the degree of improvement in teacher-reported outcomes was significantly greater for children receiving an individual version of the program. In addition, childrena's baseline level of inhibitory control moderated intervention effects, showing children with low initial levels of inhibitory control to respond poorly in teacher-rated outcomes to group interventions compared to those delivered individually. Conclusions: This study suggests overall benefits to children for either group or individual delivery of the Coping Power program under high-fidelity conditions; however, for children with low levels of initial self-regulation, individualized interventions will likely yield the most significant reduction in externalizing behavior in the school setting in preadolescence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)728-735
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Random Allocation
Social Distance
Preadolescents
Randomization
Growth
Research
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • aggression
  • group intervention
  • intervention format
  • targeted prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Evidence-based preventive intervention for preadolescent aggressive children : One-year outcomes following randomization to group versus individual delivery. / Lochman, John E.; Dishion, Thomas J.; Powell, Nicole P.; Boxmeyer, Caroline L.; Qu, Lixin; Sallee, Meghann.

In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 83, No. 4, 01.08.2015, p. 728-735.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lochman, John E. ; Dishion, Thomas J. ; Powell, Nicole P. ; Boxmeyer, Caroline L. ; Qu, Lixin ; Sallee, Meghann. / Evidence-based preventive intervention for preadolescent aggressive children : One-year outcomes following randomization to group versus individual delivery. In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 83, No. 4. pp. 728-735.
@article{295eb9dd147c41c19faa6a5618ea9bc6,
title = "Evidence-based preventive intervention for preadolescent aggressive children: One-year outcomes following randomization to group versus individual delivery",
abstract = "Objective: Some research suggests that group interventions with antisocial youth may, on occasion, have iatrogenic effects. This is the first study to test the effects of group versus individual delivery of evidence-based intervention for aggressive children. Method: Three hundred sixty fourth-grade children were randomly assigned by school to group coping power (GCP) or individual coping power (ICP). Longitudinal assessments of teacher and parent reports of behavior (Behavior Assessment System for Children [BASC]; Peer Affiliation and Social Acceptance [PASA]) were collected from baseline through a 1-year follow-up. Results: Growth curve analyses revealed that children in both conditions reduced teacher- and parent-reported externalizing behavior problems and internalizing behavior problems by the end of the 1-year follow-up. However, the degree of improvement in teacher-reported outcomes was significantly greater for children receiving an individual version of the program. In addition, childrena's baseline level of inhibitory control moderated intervention effects, showing children with low initial levels of inhibitory control to respond poorly in teacher-rated outcomes to group interventions compared to those delivered individually. Conclusions: This study suggests overall benefits to children for either group or individual delivery of the Coping Power program under high-fidelity conditions; however, for children with low levels of initial self-regulation, individualized interventions will likely yield the most significant reduction in externalizing behavior in the school setting in preadolescence.",
keywords = "aggression, group intervention, intervention format, targeted prevention",
author = "Lochman, {John E.} and Dishion, {Thomas J.} and Powell, {Nicole P.} and Boxmeyer, {Caroline L.} and Lixin Qu and Meghann Sallee",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/ccp0000030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "728--735",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-based preventive intervention for preadolescent aggressive children

T2 - One-year outcomes following randomization to group versus individual delivery

AU - Lochman, John E.

AU - Dishion, Thomas J.

AU - Powell, Nicole P.

AU - Boxmeyer, Caroline L.

AU - Qu, Lixin

AU - Sallee, Meghann

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Objective: Some research suggests that group interventions with antisocial youth may, on occasion, have iatrogenic effects. This is the first study to test the effects of group versus individual delivery of evidence-based intervention for aggressive children. Method: Three hundred sixty fourth-grade children were randomly assigned by school to group coping power (GCP) or individual coping power (ICP). Longitudinal assessments of teacher and parent reports of behavior (Behavior Assessment System for Children [BASC]; Peer Affiliation and Social Acceptance [PASA]) were collected from baseline through a 1-year follow-up. Results: Growth curve analyses revealed that children in both conditions reduced teacher- and parent-reported externalizing behavior problems and internalizing behavior problems by the end of the 1-year follow-up. However, the degree of improvement in teacher-reported outcomes was significantly greater for children receiving an individual version of the program. In addition, childrena's baseline level of inhibitory control moderated intervention effects, showing children with low initial levels of inhibitory control to respond poorly in teacher-rated outcomes to group interventions compared to those delivered individually. Conclusions: This study suggests overall benefits to children for either group or individual delivery of the Coping Power program under high-fidelity conditions; however, for children with low levels of initial self-regulation, individualized interventions will likely yield the most significant reduction in externalizing behavior in the school setting in preadolescence.

AB - Objective: Some research suggests that group interventions with antisocial youth may, on occasion, have iatrogenic effects. This is the first study to test the effects of group versus individual delivery of evidence-based intervention for aggressive children. Method: Three hundred sixty fourth-grade children were randomly assigned by school to group coping power (GCP) or individual coping power (ICP). Longitudinal assessments of teacher and parent reports of behavior (Behavior Assessment System for Children [BASC]; Peer Affiliation and Social Acceptance [PASA]) were collected from baseline through a 1-year follow-up. Results: Growth curve analyses revealed that children in both conditions reduced teacher- and parent-reported externalizing behavior problems and internalizing behavior problems by the end of the 1-year follow-up. However, the degree of improvement in teacher-reported outcomes was significantly greater for children receiving an individual version of the program. In addition, childrena's baseline level of inhibitory control moderated intervention effects, showing children with low initial levels of inhibitory control to respond poorly in teacher-rated outcomes to group interventions compared to those delivered individually. Conclusions: This study suggests overall benefits to children for either group or individual delivery of the Coping Power program under high-fidelity conditions; however, for children with low levels of initial self-regulation, individualized interventions will likely yield the most significant reduction in externalizing behavior in the school setting in preadolescence.

KW - aggression

KW - group intervention

KW - intervention format

KW - targeted prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938553203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938553203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/ccp0000030

DO - 10.1037/ccp0000030

M3 - Article

C2 - 26098373

AN - SCOPUS:84938553203

VL - 83

SP - 728

EP - 735

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 4

ER -