Every Dogma has its day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is a reexamination of "Two Dogmas" in the light of Quine's ongoing debate with Carnap over analyticity. It shows, first, that 'analytic' is a technical term within Carnap's epistemology. As such it is intelligible, and Carnap's position can meet Quine's objections. Second, it shows that the core of Quine's objection is that he (Quine) has an alternative epistemology to advance, one which appears to make no room for analyticity. Finally, the paper shows that Quine's alternative epistemology is itself open to very serious objections. Quine is not thereby refuted, but neither can Carnap's analyticity be dismissed as dogma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-389
Number of pages43
JournalErkenntnis
Volume35
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1991

Fingerprint

Epistemology
Analyticity
Alternatives
Term
Rudolf Carnap
Dogma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

Every Dogma has its day. / Creath, Richard.

In: Erkenntnis, Vol. 35, No. 1-3, 07.1991, p. 347-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Creath, Richard. / Every Dogma has its day. In: Erkenntnis. 1991 ; Vol. 35, No. 1-3. pp. 347-389.
@article{297aab189a1a46f380d0989064c18d3e,
title = "Every Dogma has its day",
abstract = "This paper is a reexamination of {"}Two Dogmas{"} in the light of Quine's ongoing debate with Carnap over analyticity. It shows, first, that 'analytic' is a technical term within Carnap's epistemology. As such it is intelligible, and Carnap's position can meet Quine's objections. Second, it shows that the core of Quine's objection is that he (Quine) has an alternative epistemology to advance, one which appears to make no room for analyticity. Finally, the paper shows that Quine's alternative epistemology is itself open to very serious objections. Quine is not thereby refuted, but neither can Carnap's analyticity be dismissed as dogma.",
author = "Richard Creath",
year = "1991",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/BF00388294",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "347--389",
journal = "Erkenntnis",
issn = "0165-0106",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Every Dogma has its day

AU - Creath, Richard

PY - 1991/7

Y1 - 1991/7

N2 - This paper is a reexamination of "Two Dogmas" in the light of Quine's ongoing debate with Carnap over analyticity. It shows, first, that 'analytic' is a technical term within Carnap's epistemology. As such it is intelligible, and Carnap's position can meet Quine's objections. Second, it shows that the core of Quine's objection is that he (Quine) has an alternative epistemology to advance, one which appears to make no room for analyticity. Finally, the paper shows that Quine's alternative epistemology is itself open to very serious objections. Quine is not thereby refuted, but neither can Carnap's analyticity be dismissed as dogma.

AB - This paper is a reexamination of "Two Dogmas" in the light of Quine's ongoing debate with Carnap over analyticity. It shows, first, that 'analytic' is a technical term within Carnap's epistemology. As such it is intelligible, and Carnap's position can meet Quine's objections. Second, it shows that the core of Quine's objection is that he (Quine) has an alternative epistemology to advance, one which appears to make no room for analyticity. Finally, the paper shows that Quine's alternative epistemology is itself open to very serious objections. Quine is not thereby refuted, but neither can Carnap's analyticity be dismissed as dogma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842852049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842852049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00388294

DO - 10.1007/BF00388294

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1842852049

VL - 35

SP - 347

EP - 389

JO - Erkenntnis

JF - Erkenntnis

SN - 0165-0106

IS - 1-3

ER -