Ethnicity and the elusive quest for power sharing in Guyana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Beginning in 1961 there have been repeated calls in Guyana, one of the most ethnically divided societies, for either modification or abolishment of the Westminster model, in particular its winner-take-all and government-opposition component, and its replacement with a consociational power sharing model; but after almost five decades, a power sharing government has not materialized. This paper examines the various proposals and initiatives to tease out their content, the motivation behind them, the discourse they spawned and the possible reasons for their failure to evolve into actual power sharing governments. The paper makes four major arguments. First, there has been a general desire for national reconciliation, mainly on the part of civil society actors and parties that embrace multiethnicity as a guiding philosophy. Second, while the major political parties have supported power sharing in principle, they have been reluctant to embrace it fully when in office. Third, political parties have been reluctant to subordinate their agendas and programs to a common national agenda. Fourth, although some political actors support the need for ethnic unity and peace, they have been reluctant to relinquish their fidelity to some core tenets of liberal democracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-355
Number of pages23
JournalEthnopolitics
Volume9
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Guyana
ethnicity
political actor
reconciliation
civil society
peace
opposition
democracy
Ethnic Groups
discourse
society
Government
Agenda
Political Parties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Cultural Studies

Cite this

Ethnicity and the elusive quest for power sharing in Guyana. / Hinds, David.

In: Ethnopolitics, Vol. 9, No. 3-4, 09.2010, p. 333-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7507acfa1b7048559ef6af798dd5a4e1,
title = "Ethnicity and the elusive quest for power sharing in Guyana",
abstract = "Beginning in 1961 there have been repeated calls in Guyana, one of the most ethnically divided societies, for either modification or abolishment of the Westminster model, in particular its winner-take-all and government-opposition component, and its replacement with a consociational power sharing model; but after almost five decades, a power sharing government has not materialized. This paper examines the various proposals and initiatives to tease out their content, the motivation behind them, the discourse they spawned and the possible reasons for their failure to evolve into actual power sharing governments. The paper makes four major arguments. First, there has been a general desire for national reconciliation, mainly on the part of civil society actors and parties that embrace multiethnicity as a guiding philosophy. Second, while the major political parties have supported power sharing in principle, they have been reluctant to embrace it fully when in office. Third, political parties have been reluctant to subordinate their agendas and programs to a common national agenda. Fourth, although some political actors support the need for ethnic unity and peace, they have been reluctant to relinquish their fidelity to some core tenets of liberal democracy.",
author = "David Hinds",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/17449057.2010.481971",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "333--355",
journal = "Ethnopolitics",
issn = "1744-9057",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnicity and the elusive quest for power sharing in Guyana

AU - Hinds, David

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Beginning in 1961 there have been repeated calls in Guyana, one of the most ethnically divided societies, for either modification or abolishment of the Westminster model, in particular its winner-take-all and government-opposition component, and its replacement with a consociational power sharing model; but after almost five decades, a power sharing government has not materialized. This paper examines the various proposals and initiatives to tease out their content, the motivation behind them, the discourse they spawned and the possible reasons for their failure to evolve into actual power sharing governments. The paper makes four major arguments. First, there has been a general desire for national reconciliation, mainly on the part of civil society actors and parties that embrace multiethnicity as a guiding philosophy. Second, while the major political parties have supported power sharing in principle, they have been reluctant to embrace it fully when in office. Third, political parties have been reluctant to subordinate their agendas and programs to a common national agenda. Fourth, although some political actors support the need for ethnic unity and peace, they have been reluctant to relinquish their fidelity to some core tenets of liberal democracy.

AB - Beginning in 1961 there have been repeated calls in Guyana, one of the most ethnically divided societies, for either modification or abolishment of the Westminster model, in particular its winner-take-all and government-opposition component, and its replacement with a consociational power sharing model; but after almost five decades, a power sharing government has not materialized. This paper examines the various proposals and initiatives to tease out their content, the motivation behind them, the discourse they spawned and the possible reasons for their failure to evolve into actual power sharing governments. The paper makes four major arguments. First, there has been a general desire for national reconciliation, mainly on the part of civil society actors and parties that embrace multiethnicity as a guiding philosophy. Second, while the major political parties have supported power sharing in principle, they have been reluctant to embrace it fully when in office. Third, political parties have been reluctant to subordinate their agendas and programs to a common national agenda. Fourth, although some political actors support the need for ethnic unity and peace, they have been reluctant to relinquish their fidelity to some core tenets of liberal democracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956253788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956253788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17449057.2010.481971

DO - 10.1080/17449057.2010.481971

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79956253788

VL - 9

SP - 333

EP - 355

JO - Ethnopolitics

JF - Ethnopolitics

SN - 1744-9057

IS - 3-4

ER -