Empirical process modeling technique for signal validation

Keith Holbert, B. R. Upadhyaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Some techniques for fault detection involve the comparison of measured process signals with independent estimates. The prediction of process variables can be achieved either by physical or empirical modeling of a plant subsystem. An automated procedure for generating empirical process models is developed here. Independent prediction of critical signals is required for consistency checking of instrument outputs, for their degradation monitoring and for isolating common-mode failures. The steady-state empirical models are developed using data from different steady-state conditions. Signal anomaly is identified by comparing the error between the model-based prediction and the actual measurement with a fuzzy function (curve) utilizing the signal tolerance as a threshold. In the event a signal is declared as failed, the predicted estimate is used as input to a control/safety system or for display to an operator. Application of the methodology to signal validation using operational data from a commercial PWR and the EBR-II is presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-403
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of Nuclear Energy
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

modeling
Fault detection
Security systems
Failure modes
prediction
Display devices
Degradation
Monitoring
tolerance
anomaly
methodology
monitoring
detection
comparison
safety system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Empirical process modeling technique for signal validation. / Holbert, Keith; Upadhyaya, B. R.

In: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 21, No. 7, 1994, p. 387-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holbert, Keith ; Upadhyaya, B. R. / Empirical process modeling technique for signal validation. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy. 1994 ; Vol. 21, No. 7. pp. 387-403.
@article{1d1a0065b1f547a0b33af647fd4ed90c,
title = "Empirical process modeling technique for signal validation",
abstract = "Some techniques for fault detection involve the comparison of measured process signals with independent estimates. The prediction of process variables can be achieved either by physical or empirical modeling of a plant subsystem. An automated procedure for generating empirical process models is developed here. Independent prediction of critical signals is required for consistency checking of instrument outputs, for their degradation monitoring and for isolating common-mode failures. The steady-state empirical models are developed using data from different steady-state conditions. Signal anomaly is identified by comparing the error between the model-based prediction and the actual measurement with a fuzzy function (curve) utilizing the signal tolerance as a threshold. In the event a signal is declared as failed, the predicted estimate is used as input to a control/safety system or for display to an operator. Application of the methodology to signal validation using operational data from a commercial PWR and the EBR-II is presented.",
author = "Keith Holbert and Upadhyaya, {B. R.}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0306-4549(94)90040-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "387--403",
journal = "Annals of Nuclear Energy",
issn = "0306-4549",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical process modeling technique for signal validation

AU - Holbert, Keith

AU - Upadhyaya, B. R.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Some techniques for fault detection involve the comparison of measured process signals with independent estimates. The prediction of process variables can be achieved either by physical or empirical modeling of a plant subsystem. An automated procedure for generating empirical process models is developed here. Independent prediction of critical signals is required for consistency checking of instrument outputs, for their degradation monitoring and for isolating common-mode failures. The steady-state empirical models are developed using data from different steady-state conditions. Signal anomaly is identified by comparing the error between the model-based prediction and the actual measurement with a fuzzy function (curve) utilizing the signal tolerance as a threshold. In the event a signal is declared as failed, the predicted estimate is used as input to a control/safety system or for display to an operator. Application of the methodology to signal validation using operational data from a commercial PWR and the EBR-II is presented.

AB - Some techniques for fault detection involve the comparison of measured process signals with independent estimates. The prediction of process variables can be achieved either by physical or empirical modeling of a plant subsystem. An automated procedure for generating empirical process models is developed here. Independent prediction of critical signals is required for consistency checking of instrument outputs, for their degradation monitoring and for isolating common-mode failures. The steady-state empirical models are developed using data from different steady-state conditions. Signal anomaly is identified by comparing the error between the model-based prediction and the actual measurement with a fuzzy function (curve) utilizing the signal tolerance as a threshold. In the event a signal is declared as failed, the predicted estimate is used as input to a control/safety system or for display to an operator. Application of the methodology to signal validation using operational data from a commercial PWR and the EBR-II is presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028467621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028467621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0306-4549(94)90040-X

DO - 10.1016/0306-4549(94)90040-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028467621

VL - 21

SP - 387

EP - 403

JO - Annals of Nuclear Energy

JF - Annals of Nuclear Energy

SN - 0306-4549

IS - 7

ER -