Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities

Jennifer Badham, Sondoss Elsawah, Joseph H.A. Guillaume, Serena H. Hamilton, Randall J. Hunt, Anthony J. Jakeman, Suzanne A. Pierce, Valerie O. Snow, Meghna Babbar-Sebens, Baihua Fu, Patricia Gober, Mary C. Hill, Takuya Iwanaga, Daniel P. Loucks, Wendy S. Merritt, Scott D. Peckham, Amy K. Richmond, Fateme Zare, Daniel Ames, Gabriele Bammer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The effectiveness of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) modeling hinges on the quality of practices employed through the process, starting from early problem definition all the way through to using the model in a way that serves its intended purpose. The adoption and implementation of effective modeling practices need to be guided by a practical understanding of the variety of decisions that modelers make, and the information considered in making these choices. There is still limited documented knowledge on the modeling workflow, and the role of contextual factors in determining this workflow and which practices to employ. This paper attempts to contribute to this knowledge gap by providing systematic guidance of the modeling practices through the phases (Planning, Development, Application, and Perpetuation) and steps that comprise the modeling process, positing questions that should be addressed. Practice-focused guidance helps explain the detailed process of conducting IWRM modeling, including the role of contextual factors in shaping practices. We draw on findings from literature and the authors’ collective experience to articulate what and how contextual factors play out in employing those practices. In order to accelerate our learning about how to improve IWRM modeling, the paper concludes with five key areas for future practice-related research: knowledge sharing, overcoming data limitations, informed stakeholder involvement, social equity and uncertainty management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-56
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironmental Modelling and Software
Volume116
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Water resources
modeling
Hinges
Planning
water resources management
equity
stakeholder
learning

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Decision making
  • Integrated modeling
  • IWRM
  • Social learning
  • Stakeholders
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Ecological Modeling

Cite this

Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management : A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities. / Badham, Jennifer; Elsawah, Sondoss; Guillaume, Joseph H.A.; Hamilton, Serena H.; Hunt, Randall J.; Jakeman, Anthony J.; Pierce, Suzanne A.; Snow, Valerie O.; Babbar-Sebens, Meghna; Fu, Baihua; Gober, Patricia; Hill, Mary C.; Iwanaga, Takuya; Loucks, Daniel P.; Merritt, Wendy S.; Peckham, Scott D.; Richmond, Amy K.; Zare, Fateme; Ames, Daniel; Bammer, Gabriele.

In: Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 116, 01.06.2019, p. 40-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Badham, J, Elsawah, S, Guillaume, JHA, Hamilton, SH, Hunt, RJ, Jakeman, AJ, Pierce, SA, Snow, VO, Babbar-Sebens, M, Fu, B, Gober, P, Hill, MC, Iwanaga, T, Loucks, DP, Merritt, WS, Peckham, SD, Richmond, AK, Zare, F, Ames, D & Bammer, G 2019, 'Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities' Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 116, pp. 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013
Badham, Jennifer ; Elsawah, Sondoss ; Guillaume, Joseph H.A. ; Hamilton, Serena H. ; Hunt, Randall J. ; Jakeman, Anthony J. ; Pierce, Suzanne A. ; Snow, Valerie O. ; Babbar-Sebens, Meghna ; Fu, Baihua ; Gober, Patricia ; Hill, Mary C. ; Iwanaga, Takuya ; Loucks, Daniel P. ; Merritt, Wendy S. ; Peckham, Scott D. ; Richmond, Amy K. ; Zare, Fateme ; Ames, Daniel ; Bammer, Gabriele. / Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management : A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities. In: Environmental Modelling and Software. 2019 ; Vol. 116. pp. 40-56.
@article{060a1f48a2f4407c84333b5052060bd7,
title = "Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management: A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities",
abstract = "The effectiveness of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) modeling hinges on the quality of practices employed through the process, starting from early problem definition all the way through to using the model in a way that serves its intended purpose. The adoption and implementation of effective modeling practices need to be guided by a practical understanding of the variety of decisions that modelers make, and the information considered in making these choices. There is still limited documented knowledge on the modeling workflow, and the role of contextual factors in determining this workflow and which practices to employ. This paper attempts to contribute to this knowledge gap by providing systematic guidance of the modeling practices through the phases (Planning, Development, Application, and Perpetuation) and steps that comprise the modeling process, positing questions that should be addressed. Practice-focused guidance helps explain the detailed process of conducting IWRM modeling, including the role of contextual factors in shaping practices. We draw on findings from literature and the authors’ collective experience to articulate what and how contextual factors play out in employing those practices. In order to accelerate our learning about how to improve IWRM modeling, the paper concludes with five key areas for future practice-related research: knowledge sharing, overcoming data limitations, informed stakeholder involvement, social equity and uncertainty management.",
keywords = "Calibration, Decision making, Integrated modeling, IWRM, Social learning, Stakeholders, Uncertainty",
author = "Jennifer Badham and Sondoss Elsawah and Guillaume, {Joseph H.A.} and Hamilton, {Serena H.} and Hunt, {Randall J.} and Jakeman, {Anthony J.} and Pierce, {Suzanne A.} and Snow, {Valerie O.} and Meghna Babbar-Sebens and Baihua Fu and Patricia Gober and Hill, {Mary C.} and Takuya Iwanaga and Loucks, {Daniel P.} and Merritt, {Wendy S.} and Peckham, {Scott D.} and Richmond, {Amy K.} and Fateme Zare and Daniel Ames and Gabriele Bammer",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "40--56",
journal = "Environmental Modelling and Software",
issn = "1364-8152",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effective modeling for Integrated Water Resource Management

T2 - A guide to contextual practices by phases and steps and future opportunities

AU - Badham, Jennifer

AU - Elsawah, Sondoss

AU - Guillaume, Joseph H.A.

AU - Hamilton, Serena H.

AU - Hunt, Randall J.

AU - Jakeman, Anthony J.

AU - Pierce, Suzanne A.

AU - Snow, Valerie O.

AU - Babbar-Sebens, Meghna

AU - Fu, Baihua

AU - Gober, Patricia

AU - Hill, Mary C.

AU - Iwanaga, Takuya

AU - Loucks, Daniel P.

AU - Merritt, Wendy S.

AU - Peckham, Scott D.

AU - Richmond, Amy K.

AU - Zare, Fateme

AU - Ames, Daniel

AU - Bammer, Gabriele

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - The effectiveness of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) modeling hinges on the quality of practices employed through the process, starting from early problem definition all the way through to using the model in a way that serves its intended purpose. The adoption and implementation of effective modeling practices need to be guided by a practical understanding of the variety of decisions that modelers make, and the information considered in making these choices. There is still limited documented knowledge on the modeling workflow, and the role of contextual factors in determining this workflow and which practices to employ. This paper attempts to contribute to this knowledge gap by providing systematic guidance of the modeling practices through the phases (Planning, Development, Application, and Perpetuation) and steps that comprise the modeling process, positing questions that should be addressed. Practice-focused guidance helps explain the detailed process of conducting IWRM modeling, including the role of contextual factors in shaping practices. We draw on findings from literature and the authors’ collective experience to articulate what and how contextual factors play out in employing those practices. In order to accelerate our learning about how to improve IWRM modeling, the paper concludes with five key areas for future practice-related research: knowledge sharing, overcoming data limitations, informed stakeholder involvement, social equity and uncertainty management.

AB - The effectiveness of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) modeling hinges on the quality of practices employed through the process, starting from early problem definition all the way through to using the model in a way that serves its intended purpose. The adoption and implementation of effective modeling practices need to be guided by a practical understanding of the variety of decisions that modelers make, and the information considered in making these choices. There is still limited documented knowledge on the modeling workflow, and the role of contextual factors in determining this workflow and which practices to employ. This paper attempts to contribute to this knowledge gap by providing systematic guidance of the modeling practices through the phases (Planning, Development, Application, and Perpetuation) and steps that comprise the modeling process, positing questions that should be addressed. Practice-focused guidance helps explain the detailed process of conducting IWRM modeling, including the role of contextual factors in shaping practices. We draw on findings from literature and the authors’ collective experience to articulate what and how contextual factors play out in employing those practices. In order to accelerate our learning about how to improve IWRM modeling, the paper concludes with five key areas for future practice-related research: knowledge sharing, overcoming data limitations, informed stakeholder involvement, social equity and uncertainty management.

KW - Calibration

KW - Decision making

KW - Integrated modeling

KW - IWRM

KW - Social learning

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062690934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062690934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013

DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.013

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 40

EP - 56

JO - Environmental Modelling and Software

JF - Environmental Modelling and Software

SN - 1364-8152

ER -