Do We Know How We Cope? Relating Daily Coping Reports to Global and Time-Limited Retrospective Assessments

Michael Todd, Howard Tennen, Margaret Anne Carney, Glenn Affleck, Stephen Armeli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study examined the concordance among daily, trait (global retrospective), and time-limited retrospective reports of coping. A sample of 93 adults completed the COPE (C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, & J. K. Weintraub, 1989) prior to recording coping with the day's most negative event for 30 consecutive days. At the end of daily data collection, participants recalled to what extent they used each of 16 coping strategies over the past 30 days. Whereas findings indicate generally good concordance between daily and time-limited retrospective reports, concordance between global and daily reports was weak. Only limited evidence was found for systematic individual differences in concordance. Time-limited reports appear to be an adequate, though not ideal, method of determining usual patterns of coping with stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-319
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume86
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

know how
coping
Individuality
recording
time
event
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Do We Know How We Cope? Relating Daily Coping Reports to Global and Time-Limited Retrospective Assessments. / Todd, Michael; Tennen, Howard; Carney, Margaret Anne; Affleck, Glenn; Armeli, Stephen.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 2, 01.02.2004, p. 310-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Todd, Michael ; Tennen, Howard ; Carney, Margaret Anne ; Affleck, Glenn ; Armeli, Stephen. / Do We Know How We Cope? Relating Daily Coping Reports to Global and Time-Limited Retrospective Assessments. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004 ; Vol. 86, No. 2. pp. 310-319.
@article{7a29fe4428f84d20bc5e9176d608bf35,
title = "Do We Know How We Cope? Relating Daily Coping Reports to Global and Time-Limited Retrospective Assessments",
abstract = "The current study examined the concordance among daily, trait (global retrospective), and time-limited retrospective reports of coping. A sample of 93 adults completed the COPE (C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, & J. K. Weintraub, 1989) prior to recording coping with the day's most negative event for 30 consecutive days. At the end of daily data collection, participants recalled to what extent they used each of 16 coping strategies over the past 30 days. Whereas findings indicate generally good concordance between daily and time-limited retrospective reports, concordance between global and daily reports was weak. Only limited evidence was found for systematic individual differences in concordance. Time-limited reports appear to be an adequate, though not ideal, method of determining usual patterns of coping with stress.",
author = "Michael Todd and Howard Tennen and Carney, {Margaret Anne} and Glenn Affleck and Stephen Armeli",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.310",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "310--319",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do We Know How We Cope? Relating Daily Coping Reports to Global and Time-Limited Retrospective Assessments

AU - Todd, Michael

AU - Tennen, Howard

AU - Carney, Margaret Anne

AU - Affleck, Glenn

AU - Armeli, Stephen

PY - 2004/2/1

Y1 - 2004/2/1

N2 - The current study examined the concordance among daily, trait (global retrospective), and time-limited retrospective reports of coping. A sample of 93 adults completed the COPE (C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, & J. K. Weintraub, 1989) prior to recording coping with the day's most negative event for 30 consecutive days. At the end of daily data collection, participants recalled to what extent they used each of 16 coping strategies over the past 30 days. Whereas findings indicate generally good concordance between daily and time-limited retrospective reports, concordance between global and daily reports was weak. Only limited evidence was found for systematic individual differences in concordance. Time-limited reports appear to be an adequate, though not ideal, method of determining usual patterns of coping with stress.

AB - The current study examined the concordance among daily, trait (global retrospective), and time-limited retrospective reports of coping. A sample of 93 adults completed the COPE (C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, & J. K. Weintraub, 1989) prior to recording coping with the day's most negative event for 30 consecutive days. At the end of daily data collection, participants recalled to what extent they used each of 16 coping strategies over the past 30 days. Whereas findings indicate generally good concordance between daily and time-limited retrospective reports, concordance between global and daily reports was weak. Only limited evidence was found for systematic individual differences in concordance. Time-limited reports appear to be an adequate, though not ideal, method of determining usual patterns of coping with stress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1342346185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1342346185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.310

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.310

M3 - Article

C2 - 14769086

AN - SCOPUS:1342346185

VL - 86

SP - 310

EP - 319

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -