Do faith-based providers respect client autonomy? A comparison of client and staff perceptions in faith-based and secular residential treatment programs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In spite of growing interest in utilizing faith-based providers to deliver services, little research exists on such organizations. This paper explores client (N = 68) and staff (N = 48) views of autonomy, a fundamental social work value, by comparing perceptions at faith-based and secular residential treatment programs. Based upon a postmodern perspective that all organizations convey a particular set of values, and clients will tend to select programs congruent with their preexisting metaphysical values, it was hypothesized that there would be no difference in perceptions of autonomy among consumers or staff. Both hypotheses were supported, suggesting that for consumers who desire faith-based services, such providers do respect client autonomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-57
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Thought
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Residential Treatment
Organizations
Social Work
Research
Staff
Autonomy
Faith-based

Keywords

  • Autonomy
  • Christianity
  • Faith-based providers
  • Self-determination
  • Welfare reform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies

Cite this

@article{ce44d6a78cb94e178e51d884c5929615,
title = "Do faith-based providers respect client autonomy? A comparison of client and staff perceptions in faith-based and secular residential treatment programs",
abstract = "In spite of growing interest in utilizing faith-based providers to deliver services, little research exists on such organizations. This paper explores client (N = 68) and staff (N = 48) views of autonomy, a fundamental social work value, by comparing perceptions at faith-based and secular residential treatment programs. Based upon a postmodern perspective that all organizations convey a particular set of values, and clients will tend to select programs congruent with their preexisting metaphysical values, it was hypothesized that there would be no difference in perceptions of autonomy among consumers or staff. Both hypotheses were supported, suggesting that for consumers who desire faith-based services, such providers do respect client autonomy.",
keywords = "Autonomy, Christianity, Faith-based providers, Self-determination, Welfare reform",
author = "David Hodge",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/15426432.2000.9960267",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "39--57",
journal = "Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work",
issn = "1542-6432",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do faith-based providers respect client autonomy? A comparison of client and staff perceptions in faith-based and secular residential treatment programs

AU - Hodge, David

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In spite of growing interest in utilizing faith-based providers to deliver services, little research exists on such organizations. This paper explores client (N = 68) and staff (N = 48) views of autonomy, a fundamental social work value, by comparing perceptions at faith-based and secular residential treatment programs. Based upon a postmodern perspective that all organizations convey a particular set of values, and clients will tend to select programs congruent with their preexisting metaphysical values, it was hypothesized that there would be no difference in perceptions of autonomy among consumers or staff. Both hypotheses were supported, suggesting that for consumers who desire faith-based services, such providers do respect client autonomy.

AB - In spite of growing interest in utilizing faith-based providers to deliver services, little research exists on such organizations. This paper explores client (N = 68) and staff (N = 48) views of autonomy, a fundamental social work value, by comparing perceptions at faith-based and secular residential treatment programs. Based upon a postmodern perspective that all organizations convey a particular set of values, and clients will tend to select programs congruent with their preexisting metaphysical values, it was hypothesized that there would be no difference in perceptions of autonomy among consumers or staff. Both hypotheses were supported, suggesting that for consumers who desire faith-based services, such providers do respect client autonomy.

KW - Autonomy

KW - Christianity

KW - Faith-based providers

KW - Self-determination

KW - Welfare reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937331842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937331842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15426432.2000.9960267

DO - 10.1080/15426432.2000.9960267

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937331842

VL - 19

SP - 39

EP - 57

JO - Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work

JF - Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work

SN - 1542-6432

IS - 3

ER -