TY - JOUR
T1 - Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting?
AU - Darnall, Nicole
AU - Henriques, Irene
AU - Sadorsky, Perry
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Environment Directorate for partial funding of this research. Henriques and Sadorsky thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grant (#410-2005-2188) for partial funding of this research. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance.
AB - With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance.
KW - Business performance
KW - Competitive advantage
KW - Environmental management system
KW - Environmental strategy
KW - Institutional theory
KW - Resource-based view of the firm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56949099493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56949099493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:56949099493
SN - 1075-4253
VL - 14
SP - 364
EP - 376
JO - Journal of International Management
JF - Journal of International Management
IS - 4
ER -