Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting?

Nicole Darnall, Irene Henriques, Perry Sadorsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

237 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)364-376
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of International Management
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Business performance
Environmental management system
Resources and capabilities
Institutional pressures
Employee commitment
Complementary resources
Germany
Hungary
Canada
Comprehensiveness
Export orientation
Systems research
Survey data
Manufacturing

Keywords

  • Business performance
  • Competitive advantage
  • Environmental management system
  • Environmental strategy
  • Institutional theory
  • Resource-based view of the firm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Finance

Cite this

Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? / Darnall, Nicole; Henriques, Irene; Sadorsky, Perry.

In: Journal of International Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 364-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8624434f49184de3b3dc84bafe9b1891,
title = "Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting?",
abstract = "With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance.",
keywords = "Business performance, Competitive advantage, Environmental management system, Environmental strategy, Institutional theory, Resource-based view of the firm",
author = "Nicole Darnall and Irene Henriques and Perry Sadorsky",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "364--376",
journal = "Journal of International Management",
issn = "1075-4253",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting?

AU - Darnall, Nicole

AU - Henriques, Irene

AU - Sadorsky, Perry

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance.

AB - With the worldwide increase in the adoption of environmental management systems (EMSs), some research has emerged that evaluates the reasons why facilities adopt them. However, there is little information about how these motivations extend to different international settings, and the link between the comprehensiveness of an EMS and business performance has yet to be demonstrated. While both institutional pressures and resources and capabilities may encourage EMS adoption and improved business performance, questions remain about whether organizations that are motivated mainly by their resources and capabilities benefit to the same extent as organizations that are driven to adopt an EMS mainly because of institutional pressures. We analyze these relationships using OECD survey data from manufacturing facilities operating in Canada, Germany, Hungary, and the United States. Our results show that facilities that are motivated to adopt more comprehensive EMSs because of their complementary resources and capabilities, such as export orientation, employee commitment and environmental R&D, (as opposed to institutional pressures) observe greater overall facility-level business performance.

KW - Business performance

KW - Competitive advantage

KW - Environmental management system

KW - Environmental strategy

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Resource-based view of the firm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56949099493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56949099493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.006

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 364

EP - 376

JO - Journal of International Management

JF - Journal of International Management

SN - 1075-4253

IS - 4

ER -