Dilemmas in regulating electoral speech of non-profit organisations

Nina J. Crimm; Laurence H. Winer

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107282117.005

Dilemmas in regulating electoral speech of non-profit organisations

Nina J. Crimm, Laurence H. Winer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Western liberal democracies, including the United States and Australia, are predicated on the rights of individual citizens not only to vote but also to participate fully in the public political arena by expressing and hearing the widest possible variety of thoughts and ideas from the most diverse sources. The FirstAmendment of the USConstitution explicitly enshrines fundamental free speech and press rights – includingmost vitally electoral speech – of all speakers: individuals as well as groups, associations and corporations.1

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Not-for-Profit Law
Subtitle of host publication	Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives
Publisher	Cambridge University Press
Pages	61-84
Number of pages	24
ISBN (Electronic)	9781107282117
ISBN (Print)	9781107053601
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282117.005
State	Published - Jan 1 2014
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Social Sciences

Access to Document

10.1017/CBO9781107282117.005

Cite this

@inbook{2458c162d63848b9890ffb88b50b81a5,

title = "Dilemmas in regulating electoral speech of non-profit organisations",

abstract = "Western liberal democracies, including the United States and Australia, are predicated on the rights of individual citizens not only to vote but also to participate fully in the public political arena by expressing and hearing the widest possible variety of thoughts and ideas from the most diverse sources. The FirstAmendment of the USConstitution explicitly enshrines fundamental free speech and press rights – includingmost vitally electoral speech – of all speakers: individuals as well as groups, associations and corporations.1",

author = "Crimm, {Nina J.} and Winer, {Laurence H.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Cambridge University Press 2014.",

year = "2014",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107282117.005",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781107053601",

pages = "61--84",

booktitle = "Not-for-Profit Law",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Dilemmas in regulating electoral speech of non-profit organisations

AU - Crimm, Nina J.

AU - Winer, Laurence H.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Cambridge University Press 2014.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Western liberal democracies, including the United States and Australia, are predicated on the rights of individual citizens not only to vote but also to participate fully in the public political arena by expressing and hearing the widest possible variety of thoughts and ideas from the most diverse sources. The FirstAmendment of the USConstitution explicitly enshrines fundamental free speech and press rights – includingmost vitally electoral speech – of all speakers: individuals as well as groups, associations and corporations.1

AB - Western liberal democracies, including the United States and Australia, are predicated on the rights of individual citizens not only to vote but also to participate fully in the public political arena by expressing and hearing the widest possible variety of thoughts and ideas from the most diverse sources. The FirstAmendment of the USConstitution explicitly enshrines fundamental free speech and press rights – includingmost vitally electoral speech – of all speakers: individuals as well as groups, associations and corporations.1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929861894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929861894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107282117.005

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107282117.005

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84929861894

SN - 9781107053601

SP - 61

EP - 84

BT - Not-for-Profit Law

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Dilemmas in regulating electoral speech of non-profit organisations

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this