Dilemmas in regulating electoral speech of non-profit organisations

Nina J. Crimm, Laurence H. Winer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Western liberal democracies, including the United States and Australia, are predicated on the rights of individual citizens not only to vote but also to participate fully in the public political arena by expressing and hearing the widest possible variety of thoughts and ideas from the most diverse sources. The FirstAmendment of the USConstitution explicitly enshrines fundamental free speech and press rights – includingmost vitally electoral speech – of all speakers: individuals as well as groups, associations and corporations.1 Indeed, the ‘[First] Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public’

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNot-for-Profit Law
Subtitle of host publicationTheoretical and Comparative Perspectives
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages61-84
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781107282117
ISBN (Print)9781107053601
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dilemmas in regulating electoral speech of non-profit organisations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this