Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists

Anthony J. Spahr, Michael Dorman, Leonid M. Litvak, Sarah J. Cook, Louise M. Loiselle, Melissa D. Dejong, Andrea Hedley-Williams, Linsey S. Sunderhaus, Catherine A. Hayes, René H. Gifford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to create and validate a new set of sentence lists that could be used to evaluate the speech-perception abilities of listeners with hearing loss in cases where adult materials are inappropriate due to difficulty level or content. The authors aimed to generate a large number of sentence lists with an equivalent level of difficulty for the evaluation of performance over time and across conditions. DESIGN: The original Pediatric AzBio sentence corpus included 450 sentences recorded from one female talker. All sentences included in the corpus were successfully repeated by kindergarten and first-grade students with normal hearing. The mean intelligibility of each sentence was estimated by processing each sentence through a cochlear implant simulation and calculating the mean percent correct score achieved by 15 normal-hearing listeners. After sorting sentences by mean percent correct scores, 320 sentences were assigned to 16 lists of equivalent difficulty. List equivalency was then validated by presenting all sentence lists, in a novel random order, to adults and children with hearing loss. A final-validation stage examined single-list comparisons from adult and pediatric listeners tested in research or clinical settings. RESULTS: The results of the simulation study allowed for the creation of 16 lists of 20 sentences. The average intelligibility of each list ranged from 78.4 to 78.7%. List equivalency was then validated, when the results of 16 adult cochlear implant users and 9 pediatric hearing aid and cochlear implant users revealed no significant differences across lists. The binomial distribution model was used to account for the inherent variability observed in the lists. This model was also used to generate 95% confidence intervals for one and two list comparisons. A retrospective analysis of 361 instances from 78 adult cochlear implant users and 48 instances from 36 pediatric cochlear implant users revealed that the 95% confidence intervals derived from the model captured 94% of all responses (385 of 409). CONCLUSIONS: The cochlear implant simulation was shown to be an effective method for estimating the intelligibility of individual sentences for use in the evaluation of cochlear implant users. Furthermore, the method used for constructing equivalent sentence lists and estimating the inherent variability of the materials has also been validated. Thus, the AzBio Pediatric Sentence Lists are equivalent and appropriate for the assessment of speech-understanding abilities of children with hearing loss as well as adults for whom performance on AzBio sentences is near the floor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)418-422
Number of pages5
JournalEar and Hearing
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Pediatrics
Hearing Loss
Aptitude
Hearing
Binomial Distribution
Confidence Intervals
Speech Perception
Hearing Aids
Statistical Models
Students
Research

Keywords

  • AzBio
  • Cochlear implant
  • Pediatric
  • Sentence testing
  • Speech understanding
  • Validation study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Spahr, A. J., Dorman, M., Litvak, L. M., Cook, S. J., Loiselle, L. M., Dejong, M. D., ... Gifford, R. H. (2014). Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists. Ear and Hearing, 35(4), 418-422. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031

Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists. / Spahr, Anthony J.; Dorman, Michael; Litvak, Leonid M.; Cook, Sarah J.; Loiselle, Louise M.; Dejong, Melissa D.; Hedley-Williams, Andrea; Sunderhaus, Linsey S.; Hayes, Catherine A.; Gifford, René H.

In: Ear and Hearing, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2014, p. 418-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Spahr, AJ, Dorman, M, Litvak, LM, Cook, SJ, Loiselle, LM, Dejong, MD, Hedley-Williams, A, Sunderhaus, LS, Hayes, CA & Gifford, RH 2014, 'Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists', Ear and Hearing, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 418-422. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031
Spahr AJ, Dorman M, Litvak LM, Cook SJ, Loiselle LM, Dejong MD et al. Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists. Ear and Hearing. 2014;35(4):418-422. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031
Spahr, Anthony J. ; Dorman, Michael ; Litvak, Leonid M. ; Cook, Sarah J. ; Loiselle, Louise M. ; Dejong, Melissa D. ; Hedley-Williams, Andrea ; Sunderhaus, Linsey S. ; Hayes, Catherine A. ; Gifford, René H. / Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists. In: Ear and Hearing. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 418-422.
@article{2be7b70447c1408db5b17794890622a8,
title = "Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to create and validate a new set of sentence lists that could be used to evaluate the speech-perception abilities of listeners with hearing loss in cases where adult materials are inappropriate due to difficulty level or content. The authors aimed to generate a large number of sentence lists with an equivalent level of difficulty for the evaluation of performance over time and across conditions. DESIGN: The original Pediatric AzBio sentence corpus included 450 sentences recorded from one female talker. All sentences included in the corpus were successfully repeated by kindergarten and first-grade students with normal hearing. The mean intelligibility of each sentence was estimated by processing each sentence through a cochlear implant simulation and calculating the mean percent correct score achieved by 15 normal-hearing listeners. After sorting sentences by mean percent correct scores, 320 sentences were assigned to 16 lists of equivalent difficulty. List equivalency was then validated by presenting all sentence lists, in a novel random order, to adults and children with hearing loss. A final-validation stage examined single-list comparisons from adult and pediatric listeners tested in research or clinical settings. RESULTS: The results of the simulation study allowed for the creation of 16 lists of 20 sentences. The average intelligibility of each list ranged from 78.4 to 78.7{\%}. List equivalency was then validated, when the results of 16 adult cochlear implant users and 9 pediatric hearing aid and cochlear implant users revealed no significant differences across lists. The binomial distribution model was used to account for the inherent variability observed in the lists. This model was also used to generate 95{\%} confidence intervals for one and two list comparisons. A retrospective analysis of 361 instances from 78 adult cochlear implant users and 48 instances from 36 pediatric cochlear implant users revealed that the 95{\%} confidence intervals derived from the model captured 94{\%} of all responses (385 of 409). CONCLUSIONS: The cochlear implant simulation was shown to be an effective method for estimating the intelligibility of individual sentences for use in the evaluation of cochlear implant users. Furthermore, the method used for constructing equivalent sentence lists and estimating the inherent variability of the materials has also been validated. Thus, the AzBio Pediatric Sentence Lists are equivalent and appropriate for the assessment of speech-understanding abilities of children with hearing loss as well as adults for whom performance on AzBio sentences is near the floor.",
keywords = "AzBio, Cochlear implant, Pediatric, Sentence testing, Speech understanding, Validation study",
author = "Spahr, {Anthony J.} and Michael Dorman and Litvak, {Leonid M.} and Cook, {Sarah J.} and Loiselle, {Louise M.} and Dejong, {Melissa D.} and Andrea Hedley-Williams and Sunderhaus, {Linsey S.} and Hayes, {Catherine A.} and Gifford, {Ren{\'e} H.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "418--422",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists

AU - Spahr, Anthony J.

AU - Dorman, Michael

AU - Litvak, Leonid M.

AU - Cook, Sarah J.

AU - Loiselle, Louise M.

AU - Dejong, Melissa D.

AU - Hedley-Williams, Andrea

AU - Sunderhaus, Linsey S.

AU - Hayes, Catherine A.

AU - Gifford, René H.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to create and validate a new set of sentence lists that could be used to evaluate the speech-perception abilities of listeners with hearing loss in cases where adult materials are inappropriate due to difficulty level or content. The authors aimed to generate a large number of sentence lists with an equivalent level of difficulty for the evaluation of performance over time and across conditions. DESIGN: The original Pediatric AzBio sentence corpus included 450 sentences recorded from one female talker. All sentences included in the corpus were successfully repeated by kindergarten and first-grade students with normal hearing. The mean intelligibility of each sentence was estimated by processing each sentence through a cochlear implant simulation and calculating the mean percent correct score achieved by 15 normal-hearing listeners. After sorting sentences by mean percent correct scores, 320 sentences were assigned to 16 lists of equivalent difficulty. List equivalency was then validated by presenting all sentence lists, in a novel random order, to adults and children with hearing loss. A final-validation stage examined single-list comparisons from adult and pediatric listeners tested in research or clinical settings. RESULTS: The results of the simulation study allowed for the creation of 16 lists of 20 sentences. The average intelligibility of each list ranged from 78.4 to 78.7%. List equivalency was then validated, when the results of 16 adult cochlear implant users and 9 pediatric hearing aid and cochlear implant users revealed no significant differences across lists. The binomial distribution model was used to account for the inherent variability observed in the lists. This model was also used to generate 95% confidence intervals for one and two list comparisons. A retrospective analysis of 361 instances from 78 adult cochlear implant users and 48 instances from 36 pediatric cochlear implant users revealed that the 95% confidence intervals derived from the model captured 94% of all responses (385 of 409). CONCLUSIONS: The cochlear implant simulation was shown to be an effective method for estimating the intelligibility of individual sentences for use in the evaluation of cochlear implant users. Furthermore, the method used for constructing equivalent sentence lists and estimating the inherent variability of the materials has also been validated. Thus, the AzBio Pediatric Sentence Lists are equivalent and appropriate for the assessment of speech-understanding abilities of children with hearing loss as well as adults for whom performance on AzBio sentences is near the floor.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to create and validate a new set of sentence lists that could be used to evaluate the speech-perception abilities of listeners with hearing loss in cases where adult materials are inappropriate due to difficulty level or content. The authors aimed to generate a large number of sentence lists with an equivalent level of difficulty for the evaluation of performance over time and across conditions. DESIGN: The original Pediatric AzBio sentence corpus included 450 sentences recorded from one female talker. All sentences included in the corpus were successfully repeated by kindergarten and first-grade students with normal hearing. The mean intelligibility of each sentence was estimated by processing each sentence through a cochlear implant simulation and calculating the mean percent correct score achieved by 15 normal-hearing listeners. After sorting sentences by mean percent correct scores, 320 sentences were assigned to 16 lists of equivalent difficulty. List equivalency was then validated by presenting all sentence lists, in a novel random order, to adults and children with hearing loss. A final-validation stage examined single-list comparisons from adult and pediatric listeners tested in research or clinical settings. RESULTS: The results of the simulation study allowed for the creation of 16 lists of 20 sentences. The average intelligibility of each list ranged from 78.4 to 78.7%. List equivalency was then validated, when the results of 16 adult cochlear implant users and 9 pediatric hearing aid and cochlear implant users revealed no significant differences across lists. The binomial distribution model was used to account for the inherent variability observed in the lists. This model was also used to generate 95% confidence intervals for one and two list comparisons. A retrospective analysis of 361 instances from 78 adult cochlear implant users and 48 instances from 36 pediatric cochlear implant users revealed that the 95% confidence intervals derived from the model captured 94% of all responses (385 of 409). CONCLUSIONS: The cochlear implant simulation was shown to be an effective method for estimating the intelligibility of individual sentences for use in the evaluation of cochlear implant users. Furthermore, the method used for constructing equivalent sentence lists and estimating the inherent variability of the materials has also been validated. Thus, the AzBio Pediatric Sentence Lists are equivalent and appropriate for the assessment of speech-understanding abilities of children with hearing loss as well as adults for whom performance on AzBio sentences is near the floor.

KW - AzBio

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Pediatric

KW - Sentence testing

KW - Speech understanding

KW - Validation study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903304407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903304407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031

DO - 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000031

M3 - Article

C2 - 24658601

AN - SCOPUS:84903304407

VL - 35

SP - 418

EP - 422

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 4

ER -