Design-build effects on a construction company: A case study

James Ernzen, Cliff Schexnayder, Gwen Flora

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A comparative study of the design-build and non-design-build project delivery experiences of one construction company was conducted to measure the advantages and disadvantages of both delivery methods. Five categories - business practices, employee satisfaction, safety, labor costs, and profit margins - were selected for study. The categories gave a broad analysis of the effect each project delivery method had on the construction project team. The business practice review revealed four categories of importance in design-build practices: team member roles and relationships, risks, strategies, and owner relationships. The employee survey targeted the contractor's field-level management and consisted of seven open-ended questions. The respondents were consistently optimistic about design-build practices within the company. The contractor's design-build and non-design-build safety records, from 1991 through 1997, were compared. The results indicated that the design-build projects experienced more minor accidents but fewer major accidents. Labor reports from two similar highway projects, one design-build and one design-bid-build, were compared. The design-build project had lower labor costs but increased quantity and cost variability. The profit margin analysis revealed that design-build project average profit margin was 3.5 percent greater than non-design-build.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-187
Number of pages7
JournalTransportation Research Record
Issue number1654
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Industry
Personnel
Profitability
Contractors
Accidents
Costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Design-build effects on a construction company : A case study. / Ernzen, James; Schexnayder, Cliff; Flora, Gwen.

In: Transportation Research Record, No. 1654, 1998, p. 181-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ernzen, James ; Schexnayder, Cliff ; Flora, Gwen. / Design-build effects on a construction company : A case study. In: Transportation Research Record. 1998 ; No. 1654. pp. 181-187.
@article{83f57deb29bf4f7699ce481e5d259265,
title = "Design-build effects on a construction company: A case study",
abstract = "A comparative study of the design-build and non-design-build project delivery experiences of one construction company was conducted to measure the advantages and disadvantages of both delivery methods. Five categories - business practices, employee satisfaction, safety, labor costs, and profit margins - were selected for study. The categories gave a broad analysis of the effect each project delivery method had on the construction project team. The business practice review revealed four categories of importance in design-build practices: team member roles and relationships, risks, strategies, and owner relationships. The employee survey targeted the contractor's field-level management and consisted of seven open-ended questions. The respondents were consistently optimistic about design-build practices within the company. The contractor's design-build and non-design-build safety records, from 1991 through 1997, were compared. The results indicated that the design-build projects experienced more minor accidents but fewer major accidents. Labor reports from two similar highway projects, one design-build and one design-bid-build, were compared. The design-build project had lower labor costs but increased quantity and cost variability. The profit margin analysis revealed that design-build project average profit margin was 3.5 percent greater than non-design-build.",
author = "James Ernzen and Cliff Schexnayder and Gwen Flora",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "181--187",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",
number = "1654",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Design-build effects on a construction company

T2 - A case study

AU - Ernzen, James

AU - Schexnayder, Cliff

AU - Flora, Gwen

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - A comparative study of the design-build and non-design-build project delivery experiences of one construction company was conducted to measure the advantages and disadvantages of both delivery methods. Five categories - business practices, employee satisfaction, safety, labor costs, and profit margins - were selected for study. The categories gave a broad analysis of the effect each project delivery method had on the construction project team. The business practice review revealed four categories of importance in design-build practices: team member roles and relationships, risks, strategies, and owner relationships. The employee survey targeted the contractor's field-level management and consisted of seven open-ended questions. The respondents were consistently optimistic about design-build practices within the company. The contractor's design-build and non-design-build safety records, from 1991 through 1997, were compared. The results indicated that the design-build projects experienced more minor accidents but fewer major accidents. Labor reports from two similar highway projects, one design-build and one design-bid-build, were compared. The design-build project had lower labor costs but increased quantity and cost variability. The profit margin analysis revealed that design-build project average profit margin was 3.5 percent greater than non-design-build.

AB - A comparative study of the design-build and non-design-build project delivery experiences of one construction company was conducted to measure the advantages and disadvantages of both delivery methods. Five categories - business practices, employee satisfaction, safety, labor costs, and profit margins - were selected for study. The categories gave a broad analysis of the effect each project delivery method had on the construction project team. The business practice review revealed four categories of importance in design-build practices: team member roles and relationships, risks, strategies, and owner relationships. The employee survey targeted the contractor's field-level management and consisted of seven open-ended questions. The respondents were consistently optimistic about design-build practices within the company. The contractor's design-build and non-design-build safety records, from 1991 through 1997, were compared. The results indicated that the design-build projects experienced more minor accidents but fewer major accidents. Labor reports from two similar highway projects, one design-build and one design-bid-build, were compared. The design-build project had lower labor costs but increased quantity and cost variability. The profit margin analysis revealed that design-build project average profit margin was 3.5 percent greater than non-design-build.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3743154032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3743154032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3743154032

SP - 181

EP - 187

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

IS - 1654

ER -