Demystifying interdisciplinary qualitative research

Thomas Greckhamer, Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, Sebnem Cilesiz, Sharon Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article seeks to demystify, through deconstruction, the concept of interdisciplinarity in the context of qualitative research to contribute to a new praxis of knowledge production through reflection on the possibilities and impossibilities of interdisciplinarity. A review and discussion of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity leads the authors to formulate and explore the following questions: What is interdisciplinary knowledge? What is it that researchers observe as interdisciplinarity? Why do researchers pursue it? In demystifying interdisciplinarity, the authors focus on the legitimacy of the sign interdisciplinary and the process of (interdisciplinary) knowledge production. After investigating the former, the authors explore the latter by metaphorically mapping the terrain of knowledge production and conclude by proposing that interdisciplinarity, as a sign, may have the function of enabling knowledge-producing organizations to leverage resources by symbolically alluding to desired characteristics of knowledge-production processes whereas, as an act, it may de facto reproduce and maintain the disciplinary organization of knowledge and knowledge production.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-331
Number of pages25
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

interdisciplinarity
interdisciplinary research
knowledge production
qualitative research
production process
legitimacy
organization
resources

Keywords

  • Deconstruction
  • Disciplinarity
  • Interdisciplinarity
  • Qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Demystifying interdisciplinary qualitative research. / Greckhamer, Thomas; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka; Cilesiz, Sebnem; Hayes, Sharon.

In: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 14, No. 2, 03.2008, p. 307-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greckhamer, Thomas ; Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka ; Cilesiz, Sebnem ; Hayes, Sharon. / Demystifying interdisciplinary qualitative research. In: Qualitative Inquiry. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 307-331.
@article{435ff64948a44494905eacc1ac26ee35,
title = "Demystifying interdisciplinary qualitative research",
abstract = "This article seeks to demystify, through deconstruction, the concept of interdisciplinarity in the context of qualitative research to contribute to a new praxis of knowledge production through reflection on the possibilities and impossibilities of interdisciplinarity. A review and discussion of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity leads the authors to formulate and explore the following questions: What is interdisciplinary knowledge? What is it that researchers observe as interdisciplinarity? Why do researchers pursue it? In demystifying interdisciplinarity, the authors focus on the legitimacy of the sign interdisciplinary and the process of (interdisciplinary) knowledge production. After investigating the former, the authors explore the latter by metaphorically mapping the terrain of knowledge production and conclude by proposing that interdisciplinarity, as a sign, may have the function of enabling knowledge-producing organizations to leverage resources by symbolically alluding to desired characteristics of knowledge-production processes whereas, as an act, it may de facto reproduce and maintain the disciplinary organization of knowledge and knowledge production.",
keywords = "Deconstruction, Disciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Qualitative research",
author = "Thomas Greckhamer and Mirka Koro-Ljungberg and Sebnem Cilesiz and Sharon Hayes",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1077800407312049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "307--331",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Demystifying interdisciplinary qualitative research

AU - Greckhamer, Thomas

AU - Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka

AU - Cilesiz, Sebnem

AU - Hayes, Sharon

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - This article seeks to demystify, through deconstruction, the concept of interdisciplinarity in the context of qualitative research to contribute to a new praxis of knowledge production through reflection on the possibilities and impossibilities of interdisciplinarity. A review and discussion of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity leads the authors to formulate and explore the following questions: What is interdisciplinary knowledge? What is it that researchers observe as interdisciplinarity? Why do researchers pursue it? In demystifying interdisciplinarity, the authors focus on the legitimacy of the sign interdisciplinary and the process of (interdisciplinary) knowledge production. After investigating the former, the authors explore the latter by metaphorically mapping the terrain of knowledge production and conclude by proposing that interdisciplinarity, as a sign, may have the function of enabling knowledge-producing organizations to leverage resources by symbolically alluding to desired characteristics of knowledge-production processes whereas, as an act, it may de facto reproduce and maintain the disciplinary organization of knowledge and knowledge production.

AB - This article seeks to demystify, through deconstruction, the concept of interdisciplinarity in the context of qualitative research to contribute to a new praxis of knowledge production through reflection on the possibilities and impossibilities of interdisciplinarity. A review and discussion of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity leads the authors to formulate and explore the following questions: What is interdisciplinary knowledge? What is it that researchers observe as interdisciplinarity? Why do researchers pursue it? In demystifying interdisciplinarity, the authors focus on the legitimacy of the sign interdisciplinary and the process of (interdisciplinary) knowledge production. After investigating the former, the authors explore the latter by metaphorically mapping the terrain of knowledge production and conclude by proposing that interdisciplinarity, as a sign, may have the function of enabling knowledge-producing organizations to leverage resources by symbolically alluding to desired characteristics of knowledge-production processes whereas, as an act, it may de facto reproduce and maintain the disciplinary organization of knowledge and knowledge production.

KW - Deconstruction

KW - Disciplinarity

KW - Interdisciplinarity

KW - Qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39149097545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39149097545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077800407312049

DO - 10.1177/1077800407312049

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 307

EP - 331

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

IS - 2

ER -