Delay Discount Rate Moderates a Physical Activity Intervention Testing Immediate Rewards

Christine B. Phillips, Jane C. Hurley, Siddhartha Angadi, Michael Todd, Vincent Berardi, Melbourne F. Hovell, Marc Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Financial incentives can increase physical activity (PA), but differences in the immediacy of reward delivery and individual differences in delay discount rates (i.e., higher discount values associated with less tolerance for delayed rewards) may explain differential responding. The current study tested whether delay discount rate moderated the relative effectiveness of immediate financial rewards on increasing daily PA. Inactive, overweight adults (ages 18–60, N = 96) were randomized to receive either smaller, immediate goal-contingent rewards or larger, delayed rewards for participation. Delay discount rates were derived for those who completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (N = 85). Linear mixed models tested interactions between discount rate and intervention arm on changes in mean daily Fitbit-measured steps from baseline to intervention phases, and rates of change during the intervention phase. Across all groups, participants increased by 2258 steps/day on average from baseline to intervention and declined by 9 steps/day across the 4-month intervention phase. The mean increase in daily steps was greater for immediate reward-arm participants across all discount rates. Descriptive exploration of reward effects by delay discount rate suggested that the magnitude of reward effects decreased at higher discount rates. During the 4-month intervention phase, rates of decline in daily steps were similar in both reward arms, but declines became more pronounced at higher discount rates. Overall, intervention efficacy decreased with less tolerance for delays. The importance of financial reward immediacy for increasing PA appears to increase with greater delay discount rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBehavioral Medicine
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Reward
Delay Discounting
Individuality
Motivation
Linear Models

Keywords

  • delay discounting
  • financial incentives
  • impulsive behavior
  • intervention
  • physical activity
  • reward schedule

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Delay Discount Rate Moderates a Physical Activity Intervention Testing Immediate Rewards. / Phillips, Christine B.; Hurley, Jane C.; Angadi, Siddhartha; Todd, Michael; Berardi, Vincent; Hovell, Melbourne F.; Adams, Marc.

In: Behavioral Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3875ee9e1ff147d0acfc0c85a8d83566,
title = "Delay Discount Rate Moderates a Physical Activity Intervention Testing Immediate Rewards",
abstract = "Financial incentives can increase physical activity (PA), but differences in the immediacy of reward delivery and individual differences in delay discount rates (i.e., higher discount values associated with less tolerance for delayed rewards) may explain differential responding. The current study tested whether delay discount rate moderated the relative effectiveness of immediate financial rewards on increasing daily PA. Inactive, overweight adults (ages 18–60, N = 96) were randomized to receive either smaller, immediate goal-contingent rewards or larger, delayed rewards for participation. Delay discount rates were derived for those who completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (N = 85). Linear mixed models tested interactions between discount rate and intervention arm on changes in mean daily Fitbit-measured steps from baseline to intervention phases, and rates of change during the intervention phase. Across all groups, participants increased by 2258 steps/day on average from baseline to intervention and declined by 9 steps/day across the 4-month intervention phase. The mean increase in daily steps was greater for immediate reward-arm participants across all discount rates. Descriptive exploration of reward effects by delay discount rate suggested that the magnitude of reward effects decreased at higher discount rates. During the 4-month intervention phase, rates of decline in daily steps were similar in both reward arms, but declines became more pronounced at higher discount rates. Overall, intervention efficacy decreased with less tolerance for delays. The importance of financial reward immediacy for increasing PA appears to increase with greater delay discount rates.",
keywords = "delay discounting, financial incentives, impulsive behavior, intervention, physical activity, reward schedule",
author = "Phillips, {Christine B.} and Hurley, {Jane C.} and Siddhartha Angadi and Michael Todd and Vincent Berardi and Hovell, {Melbourne F.} and Marc Adams",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08964289.2019.1570071",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0896-4289",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delay Discount Rate Moderates a Physical Activity Intervention Testing Immediate Rewards

AU - Phillips, Christine B.

AU - Hurley, Jane C.

AU - Angadi, Siddhartha

AU - Todd, Michael

AU - Berardi, Vincent

AU - Hovell, Melbourne F.

AU - Adams, Marc

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Financial incentives can increase physical activity (PA), but differences in the immediacy of reward delivery and individual differences in delay discount rates (i.e., higher discount values associated with less tolerance for delayed rewards) may explain differential responding. The current study tested whether delay discount rate moderated the relative effectiveness of immediate financial rewards on increasing daily PA. Inactive, overweight adults (ages 18–60, N = 96) were randomized to receive either smaller, immediate goal-contingent rewards or larger, delayed rewards for participation. Delay discount rates were derived for those who completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (N = 85). Linear mixed models tested interactions between discount rate and intervention arm on changes in mean daily Fitbit-measured steps from baseline to intervention phases, and rates of change during the intervention phase. Across all groups, participants increased by 2258 steps/day on average from baseline to intervention and declined by 9 steps/day across the 4-month intervention phase. The mean increase in daily steps was greater for immediate reward-arm participants across all discount rates. Descriptive exploration of reward effects by delay discount rate suggested that the magnitude of reward effects decreased at higher discount rates. During the 4-month intervention phase, rates of decline in daily steps were similar in both reward arms, but declines became more pronounced at higher discount rates. Overall, intervention efficacy decreased with less tolerance for delays. The importance of financial reward immediacy for increasing PA appears to increase with greater delay discount rates.

AB - Financial incentives can increase physical activity (PA), but differences in the immediacy of reward delivery and individual differences in delay discount rates (i.e., higher discount values associated with less tolerance for delayed rewards) may explain differential responding. The current study tested whether delay discount rate moderated the relative effectiveness of immediate financial rewards on increasing daily PA. Inactive, overweight adults (ages 18–60, N = 96) were randomized to receive either smaller, immediate goal-contingent rewards or larger, delayed rewards for participation. Delay discount rates were derived for those who completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (N = 85). Linear mixed models tested interactions between discount rate and intervention arm on changes in mean daily Fitbit-measured steps from baseline to intervention phases, and rates of change during the intervention phase. Across all groups, participants increased by 2258 steps/day on average from baseline to intervention and declined by 9 steps/day across the 4-month intervention phase. The mean increase in daily steps was greater for immediate reward-arm participants across all discount rates. Descriptive exploration of reward effects by delay discount rate suggested that the magnitude of reward effects decreased at higher discount rates. During the 4-month intervention phase, rates of decline in daily steps were similar in both reward arms, but declines became more pronounced at higher discount rates. Overall, intervention efficacy decreased with less tolerance for delays. The importance of financial reward immediacy for increasing PA appears to increase with greater delay discount rates.

KW - delay discounting

KW - financial incentives

KW - impulsive behavior

KW - intervention

KW - physical activity

KW - reward schedule

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064516330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064516330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08964289.2019.1570071

DO - 10.1080/08964289.2019.1570071

M3 - Article

JO - Behavioral Medicine

JF - Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0896-4289

ER -