Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious

An Expanded Buyer-Supplier Relationship Typology

Yusoon Kim, Thomas Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cooperative-adversarial dichotomy has served as the prevailing buyer-supplier relationship typology in the literature. Cooperative buyer-supplier relationships have been associated with closely tied relationships, while adversarial relationships have been equated to arms-length relationships. We propose, however, that this perspective is overly simplified; a cooperative relationship is orthogonal to a closely tied relationship and an adversarial relationship to an arms-length relationship. That is, there can be a closely tied yet adversarial relationship and an arms-length yet cooperative relationship. We theorize the buyer-supplier relationship in two orthogonal aspects-(1) relational posture, that is, how two firms regard each other (as cooperative partners or as adversaries) and (2) relational intensity, that is, how much two firms' operations are interlinked (closely tied or arms-length). By considering the two aspects concurrently, this article proposes an expanded typology of buyer-supplier relationships. We label a closely tied and cooperative buyer-supplier type as deep; a closely tied but adversarial type as sticky; an arms-length and adversarial type as "transient and an arms-length but cooperative type as gracious.We then present an analysis that supports the orthogonality of the two relational dimensions. This analysis suggests that the expanded relationship types are associated with different relational outcome trade-offs. The data are collected from a global, large Japanese automaker and 163 of its suppliers in North America. Overall, the results provide empirical support for the expanded buyer-supplier relationship typology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-86
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Supply Chain Management
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Labels
Buyer-supplier relationships

Keywords

  • Adversarial
  • Buyer-supplier relationship
  • Cooperative
  • Governance structure
  • Relational intensity
  • Relational outcomes
  • Relational posture
  • Typology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Information Systems
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Management Information Systems

Cite this

Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious : An Expanded Buyer-Supplier Relationship Typology. / Kim, Yusoon; Choi, Thomas.

In: Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.07.2015, p. 61-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b43d52a4c6f74cff9314e83372a06966,
title = "Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious: An Expanded Buyer-Supplier Relationship Typology",
abstract = "The cooperative-adversarial dichotomy has served as the prevailing buyer-supplier relationship typology in the literature. Cooperative buyer-supplier relationships have been associated with closely tied relationships, while adversarial relationships have been equated to arms-length relationships. We propose, however, that this perspective is overly simplified; a cooperative relationship is orthogonal to a closely tied relationship and an adversarial relationship to an arms-length relationship. That is, there can be a closely tied yet adversarial relationship and an arms-length yet cooperative relationship. We theorize the buyer-supplier relationship in two orthogonal aspects-(1) relational posture, that is, how two firms regard each other (as cooperative partners or as adversaries) and (2) relational intensity, that is, how much two firms' operations are interlinked (closely tied or arms-length). By considering the two aspects concurrently, this article proposes an expanded typology of buyer-supplier relationships. We label a closely tied and cooperative buyer-supplier type as deep; a closely tied but adversarial type as sticky; an arms-length and adversarial type as {"}transient and an arms-length but cooperative type as gracious.We then present an analysis that supports the orthogonality of the two relational dimensions. This analysis suggests that the expanded relationship types are associated with different relational outcome trade-offs. The data are collected from a global, large Japanese automaker and 163 of its suppliers in North America. Overall, the results provide empirical support for the expanded buyer-supplier relationship typology.",
keywords = "Adversarial, Buyer-supplier relationship, Cooperative, Governance structure, Relational intensity, Relational outcomes, Relational posture, Typology",
author = "Yusoon Kim and Thomas Choi",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jscm.12081",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "61--86",
journal = "Journal of Supply Chain Management",
issn = "1523-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deep, Sticky, Transient, and Gracious

T2 - An Expanded Buyer-Supplier Relationship Typology

AU - Kim, Yusoon

AU - Choi, Thomas

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - The cooperative-adversarial dichotomy has served as the prevailing buyer-supplier relationship typology in the literature. Cooperative buyer-supplier relationships have been associated with closely tied relationships, while adversarial relationships have been equated to arms-length relationships. We propose, however, that this perspective is overly simplified; a cooperative relationship is orthogonal to a closely tied relationship and an adversarial relationship to an arms-length relationship. That is, there can be a closely tied yet adversarial relationship and an arms-length yet cooperative relationship. We theorize the buyer-supplier relationship in two orthogonal aspects-(1) relational posture, that is, how two firms regard each other (as cooperative partners or as adversaries) and (2) relational intensity, that is, how much two firms' operations are interlinked (closely tied or arms-length). By considering the two aspects concurrently, this article proposes an expanded typology of buyer-supplier relationships. We label a closely tied and cooperative buyer-supplier type as deep; a closely tied but adversarial type as sticky; an arms-length and adversarial type as "transient and an arms-length but cooperative type as gracious.We then present an analysis that supports the orthogonality of the two relational dimensions. This analysis suggests that the expanded relationship types are associated with different relational outcome trade-offs. The data are collected from a global, large Japanese automaker and 163 of its suppliers in North America. Overall, the results provide empirical support for the expanded buyer-supplier relationship typology.

AB - The cooperative-adversarial dichotomy has served as the prevailing buyer-supplier relationship typology in the literature. Cooperative buyer-supplier relationships have been associated with closely tied relationships, while adversarial relationships have been equated to arms-length relationships. We propose, however, that this perspective is overly simplified; a cooperative relationship is orthogonal to a closely tied relationship and an adversarial relationship to an arms-length relationship. That is, there can be a closely tied yet adversarial relationship and an arms-length yet cooperative relationship. We theorize the buyer-supplier relationship in two orthogonal aspects-(1) relational posture, that is, how two firms regard each other (as cooperative partners or as adversaries) and (2) relational intensity, that is, how much two firms' operations are interlinked (closely tied or arms-length). By considering the two aspects concurrently, this article proposes an expanded typology of buyer-supplier relationships. We label a closely tied and cooperative buyer-supplier type as deep; a closely tied but adversarial type as sticky; an arms-length and adversarial type as "transient and an arms-length but cooperative type as gracious.We then present an analysis that supports the orthogonality of the two relational dimensions. This analysis suggests that the expanded relationship types are associated with different relational outcome trade-offs. The data are collected from a global, large Japanese automaker and 163 of its suppliers in North America. Overall, the results provide empirical support for the expanded buyer-supplier relationship typology.

KW - Adversarial

KW - Buyer-supplier relationship

KW - Cooperative

KW - Governance structure

KW - Relational intensity

KW - Relational outcomes

KW - Relational posture

KW - Typology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936112658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936112658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jscm.12081

DO - 10.1111/jscm.12081

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 61

EP - 86

JO - Journal of Supply Chain Management

JF - Journal of Supply Chain Management

SN - 1523-2409

IS - 3

ER -