Debates: Challenging a recent challenge to the aggressive spillover hypothesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Kralj-Fiser et al. recently reviewed the lack of evidence in favor of the aggressive spillover hypothesis, an animal personality/behavioral syndrome explanation for pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism. In doing so, they evaluated past tests of the hypothesis, set forth their ideas for criteria that need to be met to accept the spillover hypothesis, and conclude that the hypothesis is not generally supported. Here, I comment on several aspects of their position. In doing so, I identify areas in which we differ and point out several strengths of past tests of the spillover hypothesis. In particular, I suggest that researchers testing the spillover hypothesis have done an excellent job of studying sexual cannibalism in the broader context of a movement within behavioral ecology to understand where an animal's behavior falls along a continuum of plasticity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)811-813
Number of pages3
JournalEthology
Volume119
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

cannibalism
behavioral ecology
plasticity
testing
animal behavior
animal
researchers
ecology
test
animals
animal behaviour

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Debates : Challenging a recent challenge to the aggressive spillover hypothesis. / Johnson, James.

In: Ethology, Vol. 119, No. 10, 10.2013, p. 811-813.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f0cc5c45a0a47ac8dafce742f3e80a0,
title = "Debates: Challenging a recent challenge to the aggressive spillover hypothesis",
abstract = "Kralj-Fiser et al. recently reviewed the lack of evidence in favor of the aggressive spillover hypothesis, an animal personality/behavioral syndrome explanation for pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism. In doing so, they evaluated past tests of the hypothesis, set forth their ideas for criteria that need to be met to accept the spillover hypothesis, and conclude that the hypothesis is not generally supported. Here, I comment on several aspects of their position. In doing so, I identify areas in which we differ and point out several strengths of past tests of the spillover hypothesis. In particular, I suggest that researchers testing the spillover hypothesis have done an excellent job of studying sexual cannibalism in the broader context of a movement within behavioral ecology to understand where an animal's behavior falls along a continuum of plasticity.",
author = "James Johnson",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/eth.12138",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "811--813",
journal = "Ethology",
issn = "0179-1613",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debates

T2 - Challenging a recent challenge to the aggressive spillover hypothesis

AU - Johnson, James

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Kralj-Fiser et al. recently reviewed the lack of evidence in favor of the aggressive spillover hypothesis, an animal personality/behavioral syndrome explanation for pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism. In doing so, they evaluated past tests of the hypothesis, set forth their ideas for criteria that need to be met to accept the spillover hypothesis, and conclude that the hypothesis is not generally supported. Here, I comment on several aspects of their position. In doing so, I identify areas in which we differ and point out several strengths of past tests of the spillover hypothesis. In particular, I suggest that researchers testing the spillover hypothesis have done an excellent job of studying sexual cannibalism in the broader context of a movement within behavioral ecology to understand where an animal's behavior falls along a continuum of plasticity.

AB - Kralj-Fiser et al. recently reviewed the lack of evidence in favor of the aggressive spillover hypothesis, an animal personality/behavioral syndrome explanation for pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism. In doing so, they evaluated past tests of the hypothesis, set forth their ideas for criteria that need to be met to accept the spillover hypothesis, and conclude that the hypothesis is not generally supported. Here, I comment on several aspects of their position. In doing so, I identify areas in which we differ and point out several strengths of past tests of the spillover hypothesis. In particular, I suggest that researchers testing the spillover hypothesis have done an excellent job of studying sexual cannibalism in the broader context of a movement within behavioral ecology to understand where an animal's behavior falls along a continuum of plasticity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883426564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883426564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/eth.12138

DO - 10.1111/eth.12138

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883426564

VL - 119

SP - 811

EP - 813

JO - Ethology

JF - Ethology

SN - 0179-1613

IS - 10

ER -