Cycling efficiency and energy cost of walking in young and older adults

Glenn Gaesser, Wesley J. Tucker, Brandon J. Sawyer, Dharini M. Bhammar, Siddhartha Angadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine whether age affects cycling efficiency and the energy cost of walking (Cw), 190 healthy adults, ages 18-81 yr, cycled on an ergometer at 50 W and walked on a treadmill at 1.34 m/s. Ventilation and gas exchange at rest and during exercise were used to calculate net Cw and net efficiency of cycling. Compared with the 18-40 yr age group (2.17 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1), net Cw was not different in the 60-64 yr (2.20 ± 0.40 J·kg-1·m-1) and 65-69 yr (2.20 ± 0.28 J·kg-1·m-1) age groups, but was significantly (P < 0.03) higher in the ≥70 yr (2.37 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1) age group. For subjects >60 yr, net Cw was significantly correlated with age (R2 = 0.123; P = 0.002). Cycling net efficiency was not different between 18-40 yr (23.5 ± 2.9%), 60-64 yr (24.5 ± 3.6%), 65-69 yr (23.3 ± 3.6%) and ≥70 yr (24.7 ± 2.7%) age groups. Repeat tests on a subset of subjects (walking, n = 43; cycling, n = 37) demonstrated high test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 0.74-0.86] for all energy outcome measures except cycling net energy expenditure (ICC = 0.54) and net efficiency (ICC = 0.50). Coefficients of variation for all variables ranged from 3.1 to 7.7%. Considerable individual variation in Cw and efficiency was evident, with a ∼2-fold difference between the least and most economical/efficient subjects. We conclude that, between 18 and 81 yr, net Cw was only higher for ages ≥70 yr, and that cycling net efficiency was not different across age groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)414-420
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume124
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Walking
Young Adult
Costs and Cost Analysis
Age Groups
Reproducibility of Results
Energy Metabolism
Ventilation
Gases
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Exercise

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Gross efficiency
  • Metabolic cost of walking
  • Muscular efficiency
  • Net efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Cycling efficiency and energy cost of walking in young and older adults. / Gaesser, Glenn; Tucker, Wesley J.; Sawyer, Brandon J.; Bhammar, Dharini M.; Angadi, Siddhartha.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 124, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 414-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gaesser, Glenn ; Tucker, Wesley J. ; Sawyer, Brandon J. ; Bhammar, Dharini M. ; Angadi, Siddhartha. / Cycling efficiency and energy cost of walking in young and older adults. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 2018 ; Vol. 124, No. 2. pp. 414-420.
@article{ca9b66e44cd34736bf977bd825b85f6e,
title = "Cycling efficiency and energy cost of walking in young and older adults",
abstract = "To determine whether age affects cycling efficiency and the energy cost of walking (Cw), 190 healthy adults, ages 18-81 yr, cycled on an ergometer at 50 W and walked on a treadmill at 1.34 m/s. Ventilation and gas exchange at rest and during exercise were used to calculate net Cw and net efficiency of cycling. Compared with the 18-40 yr age group (2.17 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1), net Cw was not different in the 60-64 yr (2.20 ± 0.40 J·kg-1·m-1) and 65-69 yr (2.20 ± 0.28 J·kg-1·m-1) age groups, but was significantly (P < 0.03) higher in the ≥70 yr (2.37 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1) age group. For subjects >60 yr, net Cw was significantly correlated with age (R2 = 0.123; P = 0.002). Cycling net efficiency was not different between 18-40 yr (23.5 ± 2.9{\%}), 60-64 yr (24.5 ± 3.6{\%}), 65-69 yr (23.3 ± 3.6{\%}) and ≥70 yr (24.7 ± 2.7{\%}) age groups. Repeat tests on a subset of subjects (walking, n = 43; cycling, n = 37) demonstrated high test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 0.74-0.86] for all energy outcome measures except cycling net energy expenditure (ICC = 0.54) and net efficiency (ICC = 0.50). Coefficients of variation for all variables ranged from 3.1 to 7.7{\%}. Considerable individual variation in Cw and efficiency was evident, with a ∼2-fold difference between the least and most economical/efficient subjects. We conclude that, between 18 and 81 yr, net Cw was only higher for ages ≥70 yr, and that cycling net efficiency was not different across age groups.",
keywords = "Aging, Gross efficiency, Metabolic cost of walking, Muscular efficiency, Net efficiency",
author = "Glenn Gaesser and Tucker, {Wesley J.} and Sawyer, {Brandon J.} and Bhammar, {Dharini M.} and Siddhartha Angadi",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "414--420",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cycling efficiency and energy cost of walking in young and older adults

AU - Gaesser, Glenn

AU - Tucker, Wesley J.

AU - Sawyer, Brandon J.

AU - Bhammar, Dharini M.

AU - Angadi, Siddhartha

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - To determine whether age affects cycling efficiency and the energy cost of walking (Cw), 190 healthy adults, ages 18-81 yr, cycled on an ergometer at 50 W and walked on a treadmill at 1.34 m/s. Ventilation and gas exchange at rest and during exercise were used to calculate net Cw and net efficiency of cycling. Compared with the 18-40 yr age group (2.17 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1), net Cw was not different in the 60-64 yr (2.20 ± 0.40 J·kg-1·m-1) and 65-69 yr (2.20 ± 0.28 J·kg-1·m-1) age groups, but was significantly (P < 0.03) higher in the ≥70 yr (2.37 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1) age group. For subjects >60 yr, net Cw was significantly correlated with age (R2 = 0.123; P = 0.002). Cycling net efficiency was not different between 18-40 yr (23.5 ± 2.9%), 60-64 yr (24.5 ± 3.6%), 65-69 yr (23.3 ± 3.6%) and ≥70 yr (24.7 ± 2.7%) age groups. Repeat tests on a subset of subjects (walking, n = 43; cycling, n = 37) demonstrated high test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 0.74-0.86] for all energy outcome measures except cycling net energy expenditure (ICC = 0.54) and net efficiency (ICC = 0.50). Coefficients of variation for all variables ranged from 3.1 to 7.7%. Considerable individual variation in Cw and efficiency was evident, with a ∼2-fold difference between the least and most economical/efficient subjects. We conclude that, between 18 and 81 yr, net Cw was only higher for ages ≥70 yr, and that cycling net efficiency was not different across age groups.

AB - To determine whether age affects cycling efficiency and the energy cost of walking (Cw), 190 healthy adults, ages 18-81 yr, cycled on an ergometer at 50 W and walked on a treadmill at 1.34 m/s. Ventilation and gas exchange at rest and during exercise were used to calculate net Cw and net efficiency of cycling. Compared with the 18-40 yr age group (2.17 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1), net Cw was not different in the 60-64 yr (2.20 ± 0.40 J·kg-1·m-1) and 65-69 yr (2.20 ± 0.28 J·kg-1·m-1) age groups, but was significantly (P < 0.03) higher in the ≥70 yr (2.37 ± 0.33 J·kg-1·m-1) age group. For subjects >60 yr, net Cw was significantly correlated with age (R2 = 0.123; P = 0.002). Cycling net efficiency was not different between 18-40 yr (23.5 ± 2.9%), 60-64 yr (24.5 ± 3.6%), 65-69 yr (23.3 ± 3.6%) and ≥70 yr (24.7 ± 2.7%) age groups. Repeat tests on a subset of subjects (walking, n = 43; cycling, n = 37) demonstrated high test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), 0.74-0.86] for all energy outcome measures except cycling net energy expenditure (ICC = 0.54) and net efficiency (ICC = 0.50). Coefficients of variation for all variables ranged from 3.1 to 7.7%. Considerable individual variation in Cw and efficiency was evident, with a ∼2-fold difference between the least and most economical/efficient subjects. We conclude that, between 18 and 81 yr, net Cw was only higher for ages ≥70 yr, and that cycling net efficiency was not different across age groups.

KW - Aging

KW - Gross efficiency

KW - Metabolic cost of walking

KW - Muscular efficiency

KW - Net efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043531889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043531889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2017

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2017

M3 - Article

C2 - 29146688

AN - SCOPUS:85043531889

VL - 124

SP - 414

EP - 420

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 2

ER -