Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: Evidence against a single timing process for motor control

Shannon D. Robertson, Howard N. Zelaznik, Dawn A. Lantero, Kathryn Gadacz Bojczyk, Rebecca M. Spencer, Julie G. Doffin, Tasha Schneidt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

128 Scopus citations

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to examine whether timing processes can be shared by continuous tapping and drawing tasks. In all 3 experiments, temporal precision in tapping was not related to temporal precision in continuous drawing. There were modest correlations among the tapping tasks, and there were significant correlations among the drawing tasks. In Experiment 3, the function relating timing variance to the square of the observed movement duration for tapping was different from that for drawing. The conclusions drawn were that timing is not an ability to be shared by a variety of tasks but instead that the temporal qualities of skilled movement are the result of the specific processes necessary to produce a trajectory. These results are consistent with the idea that timing is an emergent property of movement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1316-1330
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: Evidence against a single timing process for motor control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this