Context-dependent conservation responses to emerging wildlife diseases

Kate E. Langwig, Jamie Voyles, Mark Q. Wilber, Winifred F. Frick, Kris A. Murray, Benjamin M. Bolker, James Collins, Tina L. Cheng, Matthew C. Fisher, Joseph R. Hoyt, Daniel L. Lindner, Hamish I. McCallum, Robert Puschendorf, Erica Bree Rosenblum, Mary Toothman, Craig K R Willis, Cheryl J. Briggs, A. Marm Kilpatrick

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

76 Scopus citations

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases pose an important threat to wildlife. While established protocols exist for combating outbreaks of human and agricultural pathogens, appropriate management actions before, during, and after the invasion of wildlife pathogens have not been developed. We describe stage-specific goals and management actions that minimize disease impacts on wildlife, and the research required to implement them. Before pathogen arrival, reducing the probability of introduction through quarantine and trade restrictions is key because prevention is more cost effective than subsequent responses. On the invasion front, the main goals are limiting pathogen spread and preventing establishment. In locations experiencing an epidemic, management should focus on reducing transmission and disease, and promoting the development of resistance or tolerance. Finally, if pathogen and host populations reach a stable stage, then recovery of host populations in the face of new threats is paramount. Successful management of wildlife disease requires risk-taking, rapid implementation, and an adaptive approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-202
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Context-dependent conservation responses to emerging wildlife diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this