Abstract

In the consumer packaged goods (CPGs) industry, consumers base their purchase decisions in part on package size because different package sizes offer different levels of convenience. The heterogeneous preference for package size allows manufacturers to use package size as a competitive tool in order to raise margins in the face of higher production costs. By competing in package sizes, manufacturers may be able to soften the degree of price competition in the downstream market, and raise margins accordingly. In order to test this hypothesis, we develop a structural model of consumer demand, and manufacturers’ joint decisions regarding package size and price applied to supermarket chain-level scanner data for the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal category. While others have argued that manufacturers reduce package sizes as a means of raising unit prices in a hidden way, we show that package size and price are strategic complements – downsizing intensifies price competition, which does not allow manufacturers to raise unit prices through package downsizing. Therefore, package downsizing does not yield a desirable outcome for manufactures. On the other hand, retailers benefit from package downsizing, as it leads to lower wholesale prices, and higher category profits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-469
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Retailing
Volume92
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Downsizing
Margin
Price competition
Consumer demand
Purchase decision
Cereals
Industry
Hypothesis test
Profit
Scanner data
Supermarkets
Wholesale prices
Consumer packaged goods
Heterogeneous preferences
Strategic complements
Retailers
Production cost
Structural model

Keywords

  • Differentiated products
  • Discrete choice
  • Package size
  • Pricing
  • Product design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Cite this

Competitive Package Size Decisions. / Yonezawa, Koichi; Richards, Timothy.

In: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 92, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 445-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yonezawa, Koichi ; Richards, Timothy. / Competitive Package Size Decisions. In: Journal of Retailing. 2016 ; Vol. 92, No. 4. pp. 445-469.
@article{cacc56b3917d4d2bb04dde9758f4eb22,
title = "Competitive Package Size Decisions",
abstract = "In the consumer packaged goods (CPGs) industry, consumers base their purchase decisions in part on package size because different package sizes offer different levels of convenience. The heterogeneous preference for package size allows manufacturers to use package size as a competitive tool in order to raise margins in the face of higher production costs. By competing in package sizes, manufacturers may be able to soften the degree of price competition in the downstream market, and raise margins accordingly. In order to test this hypothesis, we develop a structural model of consumer demand, and manufacturers’ joint decisions regarding package size and price applied to supermarket chain-level scanner data for the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal category. While others have argued that manufacturers reduce package sizes as a means of raising unit prices in a hidden way, we show that package size and price are strategic complements – downsizing intensifies price competition, which does not allow manufacturers to raise unit prices through package downsizing. Therefore, package downsizing does not yield a desirable outcome for manufactures. On the other hand, retailers benefit from package downsizing, as it leads to lower wholesale prices, and higher category profits.",
keywords = "Differentiated products, Discrete choice, Package size, Pricing, Product design",
author = "Koichi Yonezawa and Timothy Richards",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jretai.2016.06.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "445--469",
journal = "Journal of Retailing",
issn = "0022-4359",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competitive Package Size Decisions

AU - Yonezawa, Koichi

AU - Richards, Timothy

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - In the consumer packaged goods (CPGs) industry, consumers base their purchase decisions in part on package size because different package sizes offer different levels of convenience. The heterogeneous preference for package size allows manufacturers to use package size as a competitive tool in order to raise margins in the face of higher production costs. By competing in package sizes, manufacturers may be able to soften the degree of price competition in the downstream market, and raise margins accordingly. In order to test this hypothesis, we develop a structural model of consumer demand, and manufacturers’ joint decisions regarding package size and price applied to supermarket chain-level scanner data for the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal category. While others have argued that manufacturers reduce package sizes as a means of raising unit prices in a hidden way, we show that package size and price are strategic complements – downsizing intensifies price competition, which does not allow manufacturers to raise unit prices through package downsizing. Therefore, package downsizing does not yield a desirable outcome for manufactures. On the other hand, retailers benefit from package downsizing, as it leads to lower wholesale prices, and higher category profits.

AB - In the consumer packaged goods (CPGs) industry, consumers base their purchase decisions in part on package size because different package sizes offer different levels of convenience. The heterogeneous preference for package size allows manufacturers to use package size as a competitive tool in order to raise margins in the face of higher production costs. By competing in package sizes, manufacturers may be able to soften the degree of price competition in the downstream market, and raise margins accordingly. In order to test this hypothesis, we develop a structural model of consumer demand, and manufacturers’ joint decisions regarding package size and price applied to supermarket chain-level scanner data for the ready-to-eat breakfast cereal category. While others have argued that manufacturers reduce package sizes as a means of raising unit prices in a hidden way, we show that package size and price are strategic complements – downsizing intensifies price competition, which does not allow manufacturers to raise unit prices through package downsizing. Therefore, package downsizing does not yield a desirable outcome for manufactures. On the other hand, retailers benefit from package downsizing, as it leads to lower wholesale prices, and higher category profits.

KW - Differentiated products

KW - Discrete choice

KW - Package size

KW - Pricing

KW - Product design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002050617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002050617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jretai.2016.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jretai.2016.06.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85002050617

VL - 92

SP - 445

EP - 469

JO - Journal of Retailing

JF - Journal of Retailing

SN - 0022-4359

IS - 4

ER -