Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods

Subhash C. Thakur, Jie Han, Oswald Chong, Robert L. Parsons

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) is one of the most recycled materials in the United States. Due to rapid increase in the price of asphalt, engineers have tried to increase the percentage of RAP in new mixes. Different agencies suggest determining physical and consensus properties of RAP aggregate before selecting the percentage of RAP to be incorporated in the new mix. Ignition and centrifuge methods of extraction are two widely used methods to recover the aggregate from RAP. The recovered RAP aggregate is often tested for physical and consensus properties for evaluation. The properties of RAP aggregate also depend upon the method used for extraction of aggregate. In this study, an NCAT ignition tester was used for the ignition method of extraction and Trichloroethylene (TCE) was used as a solvent for the centrifuge method of extraction. The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare binder content, gradation, specific gravity, and absorption of the aggregates, fine aggregate angularity (FAA), coarse aggregate angularity (CAA), flat and elongated particles (F&E), and Los Angeles (LA) abrasion value. The test results did not show significant difference in coarse aggregate angularity, bulk specific gravity of fine aggregate, and gradation obtained by the centrifuge and ignition methods of extraction for the RAP. However, fine aggregate angularity and Los Angeles abrasion value were found higher in the ignition method of extraction than those in the centrifuge method. The bulk specific gravity of coarse aggregate was found to be higher using the centrifuge method of extraction than that using the ignition method of extraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeotechnical Special Publication
Pages4525-4534
Number of pages10
Edition211 GSP
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
EventGeo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering - Dallas, TX, United States
Duration: Mar 13 2011Mar 16 2011

Other

OtherGeo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering
CountryUnited States
CityDallas, TX
Period3/13/113/16/11

Fingerprint

Asphalt pavements
Centrifuges
asphalt
centrifuge
pavement
Ignition
Density (specific gravity)
gravity
abrasion
Abrasion
method
comparison
Trichloroethylene
trichloroethylene
Asphalt
Binders

Keywords

  • Aggregates
  • Asphalt pavements
  • Centrifuge
  • Recycling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Thakur, S. C., Han, J., Chong, O., & Parsons, R. L. (2011). Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods. In Geotechnical Special Publication (211 GSP ed., pp. 4525-4534) https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)463

Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods. / Thakur, Subhash C.; Han, Jie; Chong, Oswald; Parsons, Robert L.

Geotechnical Special Publication. 211 GSP. ed. 2011. p. 4525-4534.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Thakur, SC, Han, J, Chong, O & Parsons, RL 2011, Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods. in Geotechnical Special Publication. 211 GSP edn, pp. 4525-4534, Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, Dallas, TX, United States, 3/13/11. https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)463
Thakur SC, Han J, Chong O, Parsons RL. Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods. In Geotechnical Special Publication. 211 GSP ed. 2011. p. 4525-4534 https://doi.org/10.1061/41165(397)463
Thakur, Subhash C. ; Han, Jie ; Chong, Oswald ; Parsons, Robert L. / Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods. Geotechnical Special Publication. 211 GSP. ed. 2011. pp. 4525-4534
@inproceedings{2f8bd5a6f14c49c1ab508166fd5012bf,
title = "Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods",
abstract = "Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) is one of the most recycled materials in the United States. Due to rapid increase in the price of asphalt, engineers have tried to increase the percentage of RAP in new mixes. Different agencies suggest determining physical and consensus properties of RAP aggregate before selecting the percentage of RAP to be incorporated in the new mix. Ignition and centrifuge methods of extraction are two widely used methods to recover the aggregate from RAP. The recovered RAP aggregate is often tested for physical and consensus properties for evaluation. The properties of RAP aggregate also depend upon the method used for extraction of aggregate. In this study, an NCAT ignition tester was used for the ignition method of extraction and Trichloroethylene (TCE) was used as a solvent for the centrifuge method of extraction. The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare binder content, gradation, specific gravity, and absorption of the aggregates, fine aggregate angularity (FAA), coarse aggregate angularity (CAA), flat and elongated particles (F&E), and Los Angeles (LA) abrasion value. The test results did not show significant difference in coarse aggregate angularity, bulk specific gravity of fine aggregate, and gradation obtained by the centrifuge and ignition methods of extraction for the RAP. However, fine aggregate angularity and Los Angeles abrasion value were found higher in the ignition method of extraction than those in the centrifuge method. The bulk specific gravity of coarse aggregate was found to be higher using the centrifuge method of extraction than that using the ignition method of extraction.",
keywords = "Aggregates, Asphalt pavements, Centrifuge, Recycling",
author = "Thakur, {Subhash C.} and Jie Han and Oswald Chong and Parsons, {Robert L.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1061/41165(397)463",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784411650",
pages = "4525--4534",
booktitle = "Geotechnical Special Publication",
edition = "211 GSP",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of properties of RAP aggregates extracted by ignition and centrifuge methods

AU - Thakur, Subhash C.

AU - Han, Jie

AU - Chong, Oswald

AU - Parsons, Robert L.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) is one of the most recycled materials in the United States. Due to rapid increase in the price of asphalt, engineers have tried to increase the percentage of RAP in new mixes. Different agencies suggest determining physical and consensus properties of RAP aggregate before selecting the percentage of RAP to be incorporated in the new mix. Ignition and centrifuge methods of extraction are two widely used methods to recover the aggregate from RAP. The recovered RAP aggregate is often tested for physical and consensus properties for evaluation. The properties of RAP aggregate also depend upon the method used for extraction of aggregate. In this study, an NCAT ignition tester was used for the ignition method of extraction and Trichloroethylene (TCE) was used as a solvent for the centrifuge method of extraction. The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare binder content, gradation, specific gravity, and absorption of the aggregates, fine aggregate angularity (FAA), coarse aggregate angularity (CAA), flat and elongated particles (F&E), and Los Angeles (LA) abrasion value. The test results did not show significant difference in coarse aggregate angularity, bulk specific gravity of fine aggregate, and gradation obtained by the centrifuge and ignition methods of extraction for the RAP. However, fine aggregate angularity and Los Angeles abrasion value were found higher in the ignition method of extraction than those in the centrifuge method. The bulk specific gravity of coarse aggregate was found to be higher using the centrifuge method of extraction than that using the ignition method of extraction.

AB - Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) is one of the most recycled materials in the United States. Due to rapid increase in the price of asphalt, engineers have tried to increase the percentage of RAP in new mixes. Different agencies suggest determining physical and consensus properties of RAP aggregate before selecting the percentage of RAP to be incorporated in the new mix. Ignition and centrifuge methods of extraction are two widely used methods to recover the aggregate from RAP. The recovered RAP aggregate is often tested for physical and consensus properties for evaluation. The properties of RAP aggregate also depend upon the method used for extraction of aggregate. In this study, an NCAT ignition tester was used for the ignition method of extraction and Trichloroethylene (TCE) was used as a solvent for the centrifuge method of extraction. The objective of this research was to evaluate and compare binder content, gradation, specific gravity, and absorption of the aggregates, fine aggregate angularity (FAA), coarse aggregate angularity (CAA), flat and elongated particles (F&E), and Los Angeles (LA) abrasion value. The test results did not show significant difference in coarse aggregate angularity, bulk specific gravity of fine aggregate, and gradation obtained by the centrifuge and ignition methods of extraction for the RAP. However, fine aggregate angularity and Los Angeles abrasion value were found higher in the ignition method of extraction than those in the centrifuge method. The bulk specific gravity of coarse aggregate was found to be higher using the centrifuge method of extraction than that using the ignition method of extraction.

KW - Aggregates

KW - Asphalt pavements

KW - Centrifuge

KW - Recycling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956355977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956355977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41165(397)463

DO - 10.1061/41165(397)463

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780784411650

SP - 4525

EP - 4534

BT - Geotechnical Special Publication

ER -