Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation

Timothy J. Nokes, Kurt VanLehn

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research in cognitive science has shown that analogical comparison and self-explanation are two powerful learning activities that can improve conceptual learning in laboratory settings. The current work examines whether these results generalize to students learning physics in a classroom setting. Students were randomly assigned to one of three worked example learning conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogical comparison) and then took a test assessing conceptual understanding and problem solving transfer. Students in the self-explanation and analogy conditions showed improved conceptual understanding compared to students in the more traditional worked example condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationComputer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL
Pages100-102
Number of pages3
EditionPART 3
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes
EventInternational Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008 - Utrecht, Netherlands
Duration: Jun 23 2008Jun 28 2008

Other

OtherInternational Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008
CountryNetherlands
CityUtrecht
Period6/23/086/28/08

Fingerprint

Students
student
learning
learning prerequisite
physics
Physics
classroom
science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Education

Cite this

Nokes, T. J., & VanLehn, K. (2008). Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation. In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL (PART 3 ed., pp. 100-102)

Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation. / Nokes, Timothy J.; VanLehn, Kurt.

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL. PART 3. ed. 2008. p. 100-102.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Nokes, TJ & VanLehn, K 2008, Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation. in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL. PART 3 edn, pp. 100-102, International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World - 8th International Conference for the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2008, Utrecht, Netherlands, 6/23/08.
Nokes TJ, VanLehn K. Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation. In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL. PART 3 ed. 2008. p. 100-102
Nokes, Timothy J. ; VanLehn, Kurt. / Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL. PART 3. ed. 2008. pp. 100-102
@inproceedings{8cd62f2598e94c41876825f70e99dc95,
title = "Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation",
abstract = "Previous research in cognitive science has shown that analogical comparison and self-explanation are two powerful learning activities that can improve conceptual learning in laboratory settings. The current work examines whether these results generalize to students learning physics in a classroom setting. Students were randomly assigned to one of three worked example learning conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogical comparison) and then took a test assessing conceptual understanding and problem solving transfer. Students in the self-explanation and analogy conditions showed improved conceptual understanding compared to students in the more traditional worked example condition.",
author = "Nokes, {Timothy J.} and Kurt VanLehn",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "100--102",
booktitle = "Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL",
edition = "PART 3",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Bridging principles and examples through analogy and explanation

AU - Nokes, Timothy J.

AU - VanLehn, Kurt

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Previous research in cognitive science has shown that analogical comparison and self-explanation are two powerful learning activities that can improve conceptual learning in laboratory settings. The current work examines whether these results generalize to students learning physics in a classroom setting. Students were randomly assigned to one of three worked example learning conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogical comparison) and then took a test assessing conceptual understanding and problem solving transfer. Students in the self-explanation and analogy conditions showed improved conceptual understanding compared to students in the more traditional worked example condition.

AB - Previous research in cognitive science has shown that analogical comparison and self-explanation are two powerful learning activities that can improve conceptual learning in laboratory settings. The current work examines whether these results generalize to students learning physics in a classroom setting. Students were randomly assigned to one of three worked example learning conditions (reading, self-explanation, or analogical comparison) and then took a test assessing conceptual understanding and problem solving transfer. Students in the self-explanation and analogy conditions showed improved conceptual understanding compared to students in the more traditional worked example condition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880438569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880438569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 100

EP - 102

BT - Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

ER -