Behavioral supply management

A taxonomy of judgment and decision-making biases

Craig Carter, Lutz Kaufmann, Alex Michel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review and integrate the extensive literature base which examines judgment and decision-making biases, to introduce this literature to the field of supply management, to create a valid, mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of decision biases that can affect supply managers, and to provide guidance for future research and applications of this taxonomy. Design/methodology/approach - The authors use a qualitative cluster analysis, combined with a Q-sort methodology, to develop a taxonomy of decision biases. Findings - A mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of nine decision biases is developed through a qualitative cluster analysis. The Q-sort methodology provides initial confirmation of the reliability and validity of the cluster analysis results. The findings, along with numerous examples provided in the text, suggest that supply management decisions are vulnerable to the described biases. Originality/value - This paper provides a comprehensive review of the judgment and decision bias literature, and creates a logical and manageable taxonomy of biases which can impact supply management decision making. The introduction and organization of this vast extant literature base provides a contrasting perspective to much of the existing supply management research, which has incorporated the assumption of the rational agent, or what is known in the economics literature as homo economicus. In addition, the authors describe the use of qualitative cluster analysis and the Q-sort methodology, techniques which have been used rarely if at all in within the field of supply chain management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)631-669
Number of pages39
JournalInternational Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Taxonomies
taxonomy
Cluster analysis
Decision making
supply
decision making
cluster analysis
trend
management
management decision
methodology
Supply chain management
homo economicus
Managers
Decision-making bias
Behavioral supply management
Taxonomy
Judgment and decision making
Economics
Supply management

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Supply chain management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Management Information Systems

Cite this

Behavioral supply management : A taxonomy of judgment and decision-making biases. / Carter, Craig; Kaufmann, Lutz; Michel, Alex.

In: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2007, p. 631-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ce87a9813e540d9b5e182e089b8cdf2,
title = "Behavioral supply management: A taxonomy of judgment and decision-making biases",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review and integrate the extensive literature base which examines judgment and decision-making biases, to introduce this literature to the field of supply management, to create a valid, mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of decision biases that can affect supply managers, and to provide guidance for future research and applications of this taxonomy. Design/methodology/approach - The authors use a qualitative cluster analysis, combined with a Q-sort methodology, to develop a taxonomy of decision biases. Findings - A mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of nine decision biases is developed through a qualitative cluster analysis. The Q-sort methodology provides initial confirmation of the reliability and validity of the cluster analysis results. The findings, along with numerous examples provided in the text, suggest that supply management decisions are vulnerable to the described biases. Originality/value - This paper provides a comprehensive review of the judgment and decision bias literature, and creates a logical and manageable taxonomy of biases which can impact supply management decision making. The introduction and organization of this vast extant literature base provides a contrasting perspective to much of the existing supply management research, which has incorporated the assumption of the rational agent, or what is known in the economics literature as homo economicus. In addition, the authors describe the use of qualitative cluster analysis and the Q-sort methodology, techniques which have been used rarely if at all in within the field of supply chain management.",
keywords = "Decision making, Supply chain management",
author = "Craig Carter and Lutz Kaufmann and Alex Michel",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1108/09600030710825694",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "631--669",
journal = "International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management",
issn = "0960-0035",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral supply management

T2 - A taxonomy of judgment and decision-making biases

AU - Carter, Craig

AU - Kaufmann, Lutz

AU - Michel, Alex

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review and integrate the extensive literature base which examines judgment and decision-making biases, to introduce this literature to the field of supply management, to create a valid, mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of decision biases that can affect supply managers, and to provide guidance for future research and applications of this taxonomy. Design/methodology/approach - The authors use a qualitative cluster analysis, combined with a Q-sort methodology, to develop a taxonomy of decision biases. Findings - A mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of nine decision biases is developed through a qualitative cluster analysis. The Q-sort methodology provides initial confirmation of the reliability and validity of the cluster analysis results. The findings, along with numerous examples provided in the text, suggest that supply management decisions are vulnerable to the described biases. Originality/value - This paper provides a comprehensive review of the judgment and decision bias literature, and creates a logical and manageable taxonomy of biases which can impact supply management decision making. The introduction and organization of this vast extant literature base provides a contrasting perspective to much of the existing supply management research, which has incorporated the assumption of the rational agent, or what is known in the economics literature as homo economicus. In addition, the authors describe the use of qualitative cluster analysis and the Q-sort methodology, techniques which have been used rarely if at all in within the field of supply chain management.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review and integrate the extensive literature base which examines judgment and decision-making biases, to introduce this literature to the field of supply management, to create a valid, mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of decision biases that can affect supply managers, and to provide guidance for future research and applications of this taxonomy. Design/methodology/approach - The authors use a qualitative cluster analysis, combined with a Q-sort methodology, to develop a taxonomy of decision biases. Findings - A mutually exclusive, and exhaustive taxonomy of nine decision biases is developed through a qualitative cluster analysis. The Q-sort methodology provides initial confirmation of the reliability and validity of the cluster analysis results. The findings, along with numerous examples provided in the text, suggest that supply management decisions are vulnerable to the described biases. Originality/value - This paper provides a comprehensive review of the judgment and decision bias literature, and creates a logical and manageable taxonomy of biases which can impact supply management decision making. The introduction and organization of this vast extant literature base provides a contrasting perspective to much of the existing supply management research, which has incorporated the assumption of the rational agent, or what is known in the economics literature as homo economicus. In addition, the authors describe the use of qualitative cluster analysis and the Q-sort methodology, techniques which have been used rarely if at all in within the field of supply chain management.

KW - Decision making

KW - Supply chain management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548540327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548540327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09600030710825694

DO - 10.1108/09600030710825694

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 631

EP - 669

JO - International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management

JF - International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management

SN - 0960-0035

IS - 8

ER -