Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1

theoretical aspects

T Agami Reddy, Namir F. Saman, David E. Claridge, Jeff S. Haberl, W. Dan Turner, Alan T. Chalifoux

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A baselining methodology is crucial to verify savings from energy conservation programs, to determine progress toward preset energy-efficiency goals, and to implement performance-based shared energy savings contracts. This paper discusses the various issues involved and structures a formal baselining methodology at the facility level or whole-building level when monthly utility bills are available. Normalizing annual energy use for changes in the conditioned area and in the number of occupants as well as correcting for increases in the connected load (a phenomenon referred to as 'creep') are also discussed. The various functional forms assumed by the regression models with outdoor dry-bulb temperature as the only regressor variable are described in the framework of two widely used energy modeling software packages. An important aspect of this paper is the development of prediction uncertainty bands for the regression model, both at the monthly level and at the annual level, an issue of key importance if one wishes to reach statistically meaningful conclusions regarding month-to-month and year-to-year changes in observed energy use with respect to the baseline year. Finally, a statistical method is described by which one can overcome model identification limitations in case the read dates of the utility bills are not known. A companion paper presents the results of applying this baselining methodology to eight Army installations nationwide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationASHRAE Transactions
PublisherASHRAE
Pages336-347
Number of pages12
Volume103
Editionpt 2
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electron energy levels
Energy conservation
Software packages
Energy efficiency
Statistical methods
Identification (control systems)
Creep
Temperature
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes

Cite this

Reddy, T. A., Saman, N. F., Claridge, D. E., Haberl, J. S., Turner, W. D., & Chalifoux, A. T. (1997). Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1: theoretical aspects. In ASHRAE Transactions (pt 2 ed., Vol. 103, pp. 336-347). ASHRAE.

Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1 : theoretical aspects. / Reddy, T Agami; Saman, Namir F.; Claridge, David E.; Haberl, Jeff S.; Turner, W. Dan; Chalifoux, Alan T.

ASHRAE Transactions. Vol. 103 pt 2. ed. ASHRAE, 1997. p. 336-347.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Reddy, TA, Saman, NF, Claridge, DE, Haberl, JS, Turner, WD & Chalifoux, AT 1997, Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1: theoretical aspects. in ASHRAE Transactions. pt 2 edn, vol. 103, ASHRAE, pp. 336-347.
Reddy TA, Saman NF, Claridge DE, Haberl JS, Turner WD, Chalifoux AT. Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1: theoretical aspects. In ASHRAE Transactions. pt 2 ed. Vol. 103. ASHRAE. 1997. p. 336-347
Reddy, T Agami ; Saman, Namir F. ; Claridge, David E. ; Haberl, Jeff S. ; Turner, W. Dan ; Chalifoux, Alan T. / Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1 : theoretical aspects. ASHRAE Transactions. Vol. 103 pt 2. ed. ASHRAE, 1997. pp. 336-347
@inbook{5353c16ada6e44b59d91f45bf425fc5d,
title = "Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1: theoretical aspects",
abstract = "A baselining methodology is crucial to verify savings from energy conservation programs, to determine progress toward preset energy-efficiency goals, and to implement performance-based shared energy savings contracts. This paper discusses the various issues involved and structures a formal baselining methodology at the facility level or whole-building level when monthly utility bills are available. Normalizing annual energy use for changes in the conditioned area and in the number of occupants as well as correcting for increases in the connected load (a phenomenon referred to as 'creep') are also discussed. The various functional forms assumed by the regression models with outdoor dry-bulb temperature as the only regressor variable are described in the framework of two widely used energy modeling software packages. An important aspect of this paper is the development of prediction uncertainty bands for the regression model, both at the monthly level and at the annual level, an issue of key importance if one wishes to reach statistically meaningful conclusions regarding month-to-month and year-to-year changes in observed energy use with respect to the baseline year. Finally, a statistical method is described by which one can overcome model identification limitations in case the read dates of the utility bills are not known. A companion paper presents the results of applying this baselining methodology to eight Army installations nationwide.",
author = "Reddy, {T Agami} and Saman, {Namir F.} and Claridge, {David E.} and Haberl, {Jeff S.} and Turner, {W. Dan} and Chalifoux, {Alan T.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "336--347",
booktitle = "ASHRAE Transactions",
publisher = "ASHRAE",
edition = "pt 2",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Baselining methodology for facility-level monthly energy use - Part 1

T2 - theoretical aspects

AU - Reddy, T Agami

AU - Saman, Namir F.

AU - Claridge, David E.

AU - Haberl, Jeff S.

AU - Turner, W. Dan

AU - Chalifoux, Alan T.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - A baselining methodology is crucial to verify savings from energy conservation programs, to determine progress toward preset energy-efficiency goals, and to implement performance-based shared energy savings contracts. This paper discusses the various issues involved and structures a formal baselining methodology at the facility level or whole-building level when monthly utility bills are available. Normalizing annual energy use for changes in the conditioned area and in the number of occupants as well as correcting for increases in the connected load (a phenomenon referred to as 'creep') are also discussed. The various functional forms assumed by the regression models with outdoor dry-bulb temperature as the only regressor variable are described in the framework of two widely used energy modeling software packages. An important aspect of this paper is the development of prediction uncertainty bands for the regression model, both at the monthly level and at the annual level, an issue of key importance if one wishes to reach statistically meaningful conclusions regarding month-to-month and year-to-year changes in observed energy use with respect to the baseline year. Finally, a statistical method is described by which one can overcome model identification limitations in case the read dates of the utility bills are not known. A companion paper presents the results of applying this baselining methodology to eight Army installations nationwide.

AB - A baselining methodology is crucial to verify savings from energy conservation programs, to determine progress toward preset energy-efficiency goals, and to implement performance-based shared energy savings contracts. This paper discusses the various issues involved and structures a formal baselining methodology at the facility level or whole-building level when monthly utility bills are available. Normalizing annual energy use for changes in the conditioned area and in the number of occupants as well as correcting for increases in the connected load (a phenomenon referred to as 'creep') are also discussed. The various functional forms assumed by the regression models with outdoor dry-bulb temperature as the only regressor variable are described in the framework of two widely used energy modeling software packages. An important aspect of this paper is the development of prediction uncertainty bands for the regression model, both at the monthly level and at the annual level, an issue of key importance if one wishes to reach statistically meaningful conclusions regarding month-to-month and year-to-year changes in observed energy use with respect to the baseline year. Finally, a statistical method is described by which one can overcome model identification limitations in case the read dates of the utility bills are not known. A companion paper presents the results of applying this baselining methodology to eight Army installations nationwide.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031369958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031369958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

VL - 103

SP - 336

EP - 347

BT - ASHRAE Transactions

PB - ASHRAE

ER -