Barriers and facilitators to intraorganizational collaboration in public health: Relational coordination across public health services targeting individuals and populations

J. Mac McCullough, Eileen Eisen-Cohen, Breanne Lott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern public health emphasizes population-focused services, which may require collaborative work both across and within organizations. Studies have explored interorganizational collaborations, but there are little data regarding collaborations within public health organizations. PURPOSE: We measured intraorganizational collaboration and identified barriers and facilitators to collaboration within a large public health department through a mixed-methods study. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Our study occurred at the Maricopa County (Arizona) Department of Public Health, the third largest local public health jurisdiction in the United States. To measure collaboration, we surveyed staff using the relational coordination tool. To identify barriers and facilitators to collaboration, we performed key informant interviews with department personnel. RESULTS: Relational coordination scores varied according to the focus of the service; clinical services had significantly lower levels of relational coordination than population-focused services (p < .01). We found high levels of mutual respect and lower levels of shared knowledge across services. Facilitators to collaboration included purposive cross-program meetings around specific topics, the organization's structure and culture, and individuals' social identities. Barriers included raised expectations for collaboration, low slack resources, member's self-interest, and trust. CONCLUSION: The relational coordination of services varied significantly according to the focus of the service. Population-focused public health services had higher levels of relational coordination than individually focused services. Collaboration was facilitated and impeded by both well-known and potentially emergent factors, such as purposive cross-service meetings and organizational culture. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Population-focused services possessed higher levels of collaboration than individually focused services. Intraorganizational collaboration for improved population health relies on deliberate support from senior management and structured activities to increase shared knowledge and mutual respect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-72
Number of pages13
JournalHealth care management review
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

United States Public Health Service
Public Health
Population
Organizations
Organizational Culture
Social Identification
Health services
Public health
Facilitators
Targeting
Interviews
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{ccc8d6d5c8754ef6bb0477f1b1894c95,
title = "Barriers and facilitators to intraorganizational collaboration in public health: Relational coordination across public health services targeting individuals and populations",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Modern public health emphasizes population-focused services, which may require collaborative work both across and within organizations. Studies have explored interorganizational collaborations, but there are little data regarding collaborations within public health organizations. PURPOSE: We measured intraorganizational collaboration and identified barriers and facilitators to collaboration within a large public health department through a mixed-methods study. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Our study occurred at the Maricopa County (Arizona) Department of Public Health, the third largest local public health jurisdiction in the United States. To measure collaboration, we surveyed staff using the relational coordination tool. To identify barriers and facilitators to collaboration, we performed key informant interviews with department personnel. RESULTS: Relational coordination scores varied according to the focus of the service; clinical services had significantly lower levels of relational coordination than population-focused services (p < .01). We found high levels of mutual respect and lower levels of shared knowledge across services. Facilitators to collaboration included purposive cross-program meetings around specific topics, the organization's structure and culture, and individuals' social identities. Barriers included raised expectations for collaboration, low slack resources, member's self-interest, and trust. CONCLUSION: The relational coordination of services varied significantly according to the focus of the service. Population-focused public health services had higher levels of relational coordination than individually focused services. Collaboration was facilitated and impeded by both well-known and potentially emergent factors, such as purposive cross-service meetings and organizational culture. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Population-focused services possessed higher levels of collaboration than individually focused services. Intraorganizational collaboration for improved population health relies on deliberate support from senior management and structured activities to increase shared knowledge and mutual respect.",
author = "McCullough, {J. Mac} and Eileen Eisen-Cohen and Breanne Lott",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0000000000000203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "60--72",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers and facilitators to intraorganizational collaboration in public health

T2 - Relational coordination across public health services targeting individuals and populations

AU - McCullough, J. Mac

AU - Eisen-Cohen, Eileen

AU - Lott, Breanne

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Modern public health emphasizes population-focused services, which may require collaborative work both across and within organizations. Studies have explored interorganizational collaborations, but there are little data regarding collaborations within public health organizations. PURPOSE: We measured intraorganizational collaboration and identified barriers and facilitators to collaboration within a large public health department through a mixed-methods study. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Our study occurred at the Maricopa County (Arizona) Department of Public Health, the third largest local public health jurisdiction in the United States. To measure collaboration, we surveyed staff using the relational coordination tool. To identify barriers and facilitators to collaboration, we performed key informant interviews with department personnel. RESULTS: Relational coordination scores varied according to the focus of the service; clinical services had significantly lower levels of relational coordination than population-focused services (p < .01). We found high levels of mutual respect and lower levels of shared knowledge across services. Facilitators to collaboration included purposive cross-program meetings around specific topics, the organization's structure and culture, and individuals' social identities. Barriers included raised expectations for collaboration, low slack resources, member's self-interest, and trust. CONCLUSION: The relational coordination of services varied significantly according to the focus of the service. Population-focused public health services had higher levels of relational coordination than individually focused services. Collaboration was facilitated and impeded by both well-known and potentially emergent factors, such as purposive cross-service meetings and organizational culture. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Population-focused services possessed higher levels of collaboration than individually focused services. Intraorganizational collaboration for improved population health relies on deliberate support from senior management and structured activities to increase shared knowledge and mutual respect.

AB - BACKGROUND: Modern public health emphasizes population-focused services, which may require collaborative work both across and within organizations. Studies have explored interorganizational collaborations, but there are little data regarding collaborations within public health organizations. PURPOSE: We measured intraorganizational collaboration and identified barriers and facilitators to collaboration within a large public health department through a mixed-methods study. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Our study occurred at the Maricopa County (Arizona) Department of Public Health, the third largest local public health jurisdiction in the United States. To measure collaboration, we surveyed staff using the relational coordination tool. To identify barriers and facilitators to collaboration, we performed key informant interviews with department personnel. RESULTS: Relational coordination scores varied according to the focus of the service; clinical services had significantly lower levels of relational coordination than population-focused services (p < .01). We found high levels of mutual respect and lower levels of shared knowledge across services. Facilitators to collaboration included purposive cross-program meetings around specific topics, the organization's structure and culture, and individuals' social identities. Barriers included raised expectations for collaboration, low slack resources, member's self-interest, and trust. CONCLUSION: The relational coordination of services varied significantly according to the focus of the service. Population-focused public health services had higher levels of relational coordination than individually focused services. Collaboration was facilitated and impeded by both well-known and potentially emergent factors, such as purposive cross-service meetings and organizational culture. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Population-focused services possessed higher levels of collaboration than individually focused services. Intraorganizational collaboration for improved population health relies on deliberate support from senior management and structured activities to increase shared knowledge and mutual respect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075525603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075525603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000203

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000203

M3 - Article

C2 - 29742523

AN - SCOPUS:85075525603

VL - 45

SP - 60

EP - 72

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 1

ER -