Attitudes among Occupy DC participants about the use of violence against police

Edward Maguire, Maya Barak, Karie Cross, Kris Lugo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social movements often embrace nonviolent civil disobedience strategies. At the same time, social movements sometimes attract participants with different temperaments and different views on the morality or utility of using violence against police. Moreover, the use of force or procedurally unjust tactics by police may influence these views, instigating rebellion and support for the use of violence against police by protesters. This paper examines the nature and correlates of attitudes toward using violence against police among Occupy DC participants in Washington, DC. Data are drawn from a survey of 136 Occupy DC participants. We provide descriptive statistics that summarise Occupiers’ attitudes toward the use of violence against police, and test hypotheses about factors that may be associated with these attitudes. Our findings show that a non-trivial subset of participants appears to embrace the use of violence against police, and that these attitudes toward violence are associated with perceptions of the extent to which police treat protesters in a procedurally unjust manner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalPolicing and Society
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 5 2016

Fingerprint

police
violence
Social Movements
civil disobedience
descriptive statistics
morality
tactics

Keywords

  • defiance
  • Police
  • procedural justice
  • protest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Attitudes among Occupy DC participants about the use of violence against police. / Maguire, Edward; Barak, Maya; Cross, Karie; Lugo, Kris.

In: Policing and Society, 05.07.2016, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{768822772f6b4359a984596d20151333,
title = "Attitudes among Occupy DC participants about the use of violence against police",
abstract = "Social movements often embrace nonviolent civil disobedience strategies. At the same time, social movements sometimes attract participants with different temperaments and different views on the morality or utility of using violence against police. Moreover, the use of force or procedurally unjust tactics by police may influence these views, instigating rebellion and support for the use of violence against police by protesters. This paper examines the nature and correlates of attitudes toward using violence against police among Occupy DC participants in Washington, DC. Data are drawn from a survey of 136 Occupy DC participants. We provide descriptive statistics that summarise Occupiers’ attitudes toward the use of violence against police, and test hypotheses about factors that may be associated with these attitudes. Our findings show that a non-trivial subset of participants appears to embrace the use of violence against police, and that these attitudes toward violence are associated with perceptions of the extent to which police treat protesters in a procedurally unjust manner.",
keywords = "defiance, Police, procedural justice, protest",
author = "Edward Maguire and Maya Barak and Karie Cross and Kris Lugo",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/10439463.2016.1202247",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Policing and Society",
issn = "1043-9463",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes among Occupy DC participants about the use of violence against police

AU - Maguire, Edward

AU - Barak, Maya

AU - Cross, Karie

AU - Lugo, Kris

PY - 2016/7/5

Y1 - 2016/7/5

N2 - Social movements often embrace nonviolent civil disobedience strategies. At the same time, social movements sometimes attract participants with different temperaments and different views on the morality or utility of using violence against police. Moreover, the use of force or procedurally unjust tactics by police may influence these views, instigating rebellion and support for the use of violence against police by protesters. This paper examines the nature and correlates of attitudes toward using violence against police among Occupy DC participants in Washington, DC. Data are drawn from a survey of 136 Occupy DC participants. We provide descriptive statistics that summarise Occupiers’ attitudes toward the use of violence against police, and test hypotheses about factors that may be associated with these attitudes. Our findings show that a non-trivial subset of participants appears to embrace the use of violence against police, and that these attitudes toward violence are associated with perceptions of the extent to which police treat protesters in a procedurally unjust manner.

AB - Social movements often embrace nonviolent civil disobedience strategies. At the same time, social movements sometimes attract participants with different temperaments and different views on the morality or utility of using violence against police. Moreover, the use of force or procedurally unjust tactics by police may influence these views, instigating rebellion and support for the use of violence against police by protesters. This paper examines the nature and correlates of attitudes toward using violence against police among Occupy DC participants in Washington, DC. Data are drawn from a survey of 136 Occupy DC participants. We provide descriptive statistics that summarise Occupiers’ attitudes toward the use of violence against police, and test hypotheses about factors that may be associated with these attitudes. Our findings show that a non-trivial subset of participants appears to embrace the use of violence against police, and that these attitudes toward violence are associated with perceptions of the extent to which police treat protesters in a procedurally unjust manner.

KW - defiance

KW - Police

KW - procedural justice

KW - protest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979026603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979026603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10439463.2016.1202247

DO - 10.1080/10439463.2016.1202247

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Policing and Society

JF - Policing and Society

SN - 1043-9463

ER -