Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education

Steven Ayer, Robert M. Leicht, Christie A. Smith

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

To improve first year engineering students' understanding of the design process, a collaborative bridge design project is given to Architectural Engineering students during their first year at Penn State. This paper examines the benefits of reverting to traditional physical prototyping techniques for students to better understand the design process and how to compose and interpret design documents. Students create a preliminary set of design documents, exchange documents with a group of their peers, physically build a prototype of their peers' design, and synthesize design feedback. This process of generating feedback from another group's design through building their bridge benefits the students by allowing them to improve their design document comprehension skills and by gaining formative design feedback from another group of students in their class. After the prototyping activity: students were more likely to recognize areas of deficiency of their own work as well as the work of others; they could comprehend their peers' work well enough to accurately predict the primary design intent of their peers' designs; and the quality of the design documentation submitted improved over prior semesters that did not involve a prototyping design review activity. While this exploratory research suggests several distinct learning benefits based on the obtained data, it was also found that students' self-reports suggest that they do not necessarily recognize the learning benefits from this type of prototyping activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConstruction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress
Pages2021-2030
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes
EventConstruction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World - West Lafayette, IN, United States
Duration: May 21 2012May 23 2012

Other

OtherConstruction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World
CountryUnited States
CityWest Lafayette, IN
Period5/21/125/23/12

Fingerprint

Engineering education
Students
Feedback

Keywords

  • Bridge building
  • Prototyping
  • Student assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Ayer, S., Leicht, R. M., & Smith, C. A. (2012). Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education. In Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress (pp. 2021-2030) https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.203

Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education. / Ayer, Steven; Leicht, Robert M.; Smith, Christie A.

Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress. 2012. p. 2021-2030.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ayer, S, Leicht, RM & Smith, CA 2012, Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education. in Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress. pp. 2021-2030, Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, West Lafayette, IN, United States, 5/21/12. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.203
Ayer S, Leicht RM, Smith CA. Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education. In Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress. 2012. p. 2021-2030 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.203
Ayer, Steven ; Leicht, Robert M. ; Smith, Christie A. / Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education. Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress. 2012. pp. 2021-2030
@inproceedings{35dc4c02d9564ce08a67461c91366e49,
title = "Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education",
abstract = "To improve first year engineering students' understanding of the design process, a collaborative bridge design project is given to Architectural Engineering students during their first year at Penn State. This paper examines the benefits of reverting to traditional physical prototyping techniques for students to better understand the design process and how to compose and interpret design documents. Students create a preliminary set of design documents, exchange documents with a group of their peers, physically build a prototype of their peers' design, and synthesize design feedback. This process of generating feedback from another group's design through building their bridge benefits the students by allowing them to improve their design document comprehension skills and by gaining formative design feedback from another group of students in their class. After the prototyping activity: students were more likely to recognize areas of deficiency of their own work as well as the work of others; they could comprehend their peers' work well enough to accurately predict the primary design intent of their peers' designs; and the quality of the design documentation submitted improved over prior semesters that did not involve a prototyping design review activity. While this exploratory research suggests several distinct learning benefits based on the obtained data, it was also found that students' self-reports suggest that they do not necessarily recognize the learning benefits from this type of prototyping activity.",
keywords = "Bridge building, Prototyping, Student assessment",
author = "Steven Ayer and Leicht, {Robert M.} and Smith, {Christie A.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1061/9780784412329.203",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784412329",
pages = "2021--2030",
booktitle = "Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Assessing the impact of physical prototyping in first-year engineering education

AU - Ayer, Steven

AU - Leicht, Robert M.

AU - Smith, Christie A.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - To improve first year engineering students' understanding of the design process, a collaborative bridge design project is given to Architectural Engineering students during their first year at Penn State. This paper examines the benefits of reverting to traditional physical prototyping techniques for students to better understand the design process and how to compose and interpret design documents. Students create a preliminary set of design documents, exchange documents with a group of their peers, physically build a prototype of their peers' design, and synthesize design feedback. This process of generating feedback from another group's design through building their bridge benefits the students by allowing them to improve their design document comprehension skills and by gaining formative design feedback from another group of students in their class. After the prototyping activity: students were more likely to recognize areas of deficiency of their own work as well as the work of others; they could comprehend their peers' work well enough to accurately predict the primary design intent of their peers' designs; and the quality of the design documentation submitted improved over prior semesters that did not involve a prototyping design review activity. While this exploratory research suggests several distinct learning benefits based on the obtained data, it was also found that students' self-reports suggest that they do not necessarily recognize the learning benefits from this type of prototyping activity.

AB - To improve first year engineering students' understanding of the design process, a collaborative bridge design project is given to Architectural Engineering students during their first year at Penn State. This paper examines the benefits of reverting to traditional physical prototyping techniques for students to better understand the design process and how to compose and interpret design documents. Students create a preliminary set of design documents, exchange documents with a group of their peers, physically build a prototype of their peers' design, and synthesize design feedback. This process of generating feedback from another group's design through building their bridge benefits the students by allowing them to improve their design document comprehension skills and by gaining formative design feedback from another group of students in their class. After the prototyping activity: students were more likely to recognize areas of deficiency of their own work as well as the work of others; they could comprehend their peers' work well enough to accurately predict the primary design intent of their peers' designs; and the quality of the design documentation submitted improved over prior semesters that did not involve a prototyping design review activity. While this exploratory research suggests several distinct learning benefits based on the obtained data, it was also found that students' self-reports suggest that they do not necessarily recognize the learning benefits from this type of prototyping activity.

KW - Bridge building

KW - Prototyping

KW - Student assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866259296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866259296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784412329.203

DO - 10.1061/9780784412329.203

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780784412329

SP - 2021

EP - 2030

BT - Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, Proceedings of the 2012 Construction Research Congress

ER -