Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements

Andrew Maynard, Robert J. Aitken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

194 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For over half a century, health-related aerosol exposure measurements have been characterized in terms of the mass of material present per unit volume of air. Yet recent research has challenged the applicability of this paradigm to airborne nanometer-scale particles (nanoparticles) and nanometer-structured particles (nanostructured particles). By classifying engineered nanoparticles into categories based on physical/chemical structure, and relating these categories to health impact-relevant attributes, we have explored the applicability of different physical exposure metrics to a range of particle class/attribute combinations. Using this approach, it is clear that no single method for monitoring nanoaerosol exposure will suit all nanomaterials. Rather, there will be occasions where particle number, surface area and even mass concentration measurements will play an important role in evaluating potential impact. Correspondingly, currently available techniques to measure exposure against these three metrics are reviewed. While current methods enable aerosol concentration to be evaluated against all three metrics, most techniques are inappropriate for making routine personal exposure measurements on a regular basis. We therefore explore the idea of a universal aerosol monitor, which would enable personal exposure measurements to be collected for all three metrics simultaneously, while being inexpensive enough to encourage widespread use. Such a device would provide an economical and adaptable solution to monitoring exposure to nanostructured aerosols, as both the materials and information on the potential risks they present are developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-41
Number of pages16
JournalNanotoxicology
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nanostructures
Aerosols
Nanostructured materials
Health
Monitoring
Air
Equipment and Supplies
Research

Keywords

  • Aerosol
  • Exposure measurement
  • Measurement
  • Nanomaterials
  • Nanoparticle
  • Nanotechnology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology

Cite this

Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials : Current abilities and future requirements. / Maynard, Andrew; Aitken, Robert J.

In: Nanotoxicology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 26-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8051f94032f478eba52ea11e943e2ad,
title = "Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements",
abstract = "For over half a century, health-related aerosol exposure measurements have been characterized in terms of the mass of material present per unit volume of air. Yet recent research has challenged the applicability of this paradigm to airborne nanometer-scale particles (nanoparticles) and nanometer-structured particles (nanostructured particles). By classifying engineered nanoparticles into categories based on physical/chemical structure, and relating these categories to health impact-relevant attributes, we have explored the applicability of different physical exposure metrics to a range of particle class/attribute combinations. Using this approach, it is clear that no single method for monitoring nanoaerosol exposure will suit all nanomaterials. Rather, there will be occasions where particle number, surface area and even mass concentration measurements will play an important role in evaluating potential impact. Correspondingly, currently available techniques to measure exposure against these three metrics are reviewed. While current methods enable aerosol concentration to be evaluated against all three metrics, most techniques are inappropriate for making routine personal exposure measurements on a regular basis. We therefore explore the idea of a universal aerosol monitor, which would enable personal exposure measurements to be collected for all three metrics simultaneously, while being inexpensive enough to encourage widespread use. Such a device would provide an economical and adaptable solution to monitoring exposure to nanostructured aerosols, as both the materials and information on the potential risks they present are developed.",
keywords = "Aerosol, Exposure measurement, Measurement, Nanomaterials, Nanoparticle, Nanotechnology",
author = "Andrew Maynard and Aitken, {Robert J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/17435390701314720",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "26--41",
journal = "Nanotoxicology",
issn = "1743-5390",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials

T2 - Current abilities and future requirements

AU - Maynard, Andrew

AU - Aitken, Robert J.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - For over half a century, health-related aerosol exposure measurements have been characterized in terms of the mass of material present per unit volume of air. Yet recent research has challenged the applicability of this paradigm to airborne nanometer-scale particles (nanoparticles) and nanometer-structured particles (nanostructured particles). By classifying engineered nanoparticles into categories based on physical/chemical structure, and relating these categories to health impact-relevant attributes, we have explored the applicability of different physical exposure metrics to a range of particle class/attribute combinations. Using this approach, it is clear that no single method for monitoring nanoaerosol exposure will suit all nanomaterials. Rather, there will be occasions where particle number, surface area and even mass concentration measurements will play an important role in evaluating potential impact. Correspondingly, currently available techniques to measure exposure against these three metrics are reviewed. While current methods enable aerosol concentration to be evaluated against all three metrics, most techniques are inappropriate for making routine personal exposure measurements on a regular basis. We therefore explore the idea of a universal aerosol monitor, which would enable personal exposure measurements to be collected for all three metrics simultaneously, while being inexpensive enough to encourage widespread use. Such a device would provide an economical and adaptable solution to monitoring exposure to nanostructured aerosols, as both the materials and information on the potential risks they present are developed.

AB - For over half a century, health-related aerosol exposure measurements have been characterized in terms of the mass of material present per unit volume of air. Yet recent research has challenged the applicability of this paradigm to airborne nanometer-scale particles (nanoparticles) and nanometer-structured particles (nanostructured particles). By classifying engineered nanoparticles into categories based on physical/chemical structure, and relating these categories to health impact-relevant attributes, we have explored the applicability of different physical exposure metrics to a range of particle class/attribute combinations. Using this approach, it is clear that no single method for monitoring nanoaerosol exposure will suit all nanomaterials. Rather, there will be occasions where particle number, surface area and even mass concentration measurements will play an important role in evaluating potential impact. Correspondingly, currently available techniques to measure exposure against these three metrics are reviewed. While current methods enable aerosol concentration to be evaluated against all three metrics, most techniques are inappropriate for making routine personal exposure measurements on a regular basis. We therefore explore the idea of a universal aerosol monitor, which would enable personal exposure measurements to be collected for all three metrics simultaneously, while being inexpensive enough to encourage widespread use. Such a device would provide an economical and adaptable solution to monitoring exposure to nanostructured aerosols, as both the materials and information on the potential risks they present are developed.

KW - Aerosol

KW - Exposure measurement

KW - Measurement

KW - Nanomaterials

KW - Nanoparticle

KW - Nanotechnology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147150120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147150120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17435390701314720

DO - 10.1080/17435390701314720

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34147150120

VL - 1

SP - 26

EP - 41

JO - Nanotoxicology

JF - Nanotoxicology

SN - 1743-5390

IS - 1

ER -