Assessing elder mistreatment: Instrument development and implications for adult protective services

Elizabeth Anthony, Amanda J. Lehning, Michael J. Austin, Michael D. Peck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessment of elder mistreatment is hindered by a myriad of factors, including inconsistent definitions, divergent and untested theories of causation, and limited research attention to the problem. In addition to these difficulties, professionals encounter complex situations requiring considerable clinical assessment skills and decision-making capacity. Adult Protective Services (APS) workers, as well as mandated reporters such as healthcare providers and social workers, need an assessment tool that can reliably and accurately assess for elder mistreatment. Based on a structured review of screening and assessment instruments, this article discusses the psychometric properties of 15 instruments and the relevance to APS. Implications of the findings for future research, practice, and policy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)815-836
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Gerontological Social Work
Volume52
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Clinical Competence
Needs Assessment
Psychometrics
Causality
Health Personnel
Decision Making
Research
reporter
psychometrics
social worker
decision making
worker
Social Workers

Keywords

  • APS
  • Assessment
  • Elder abuse
  • Elder mistreatment
  • Screening tools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Assessing elder mistreatment : Instrument development and implications for adult protective services. / Anthony, Elizabeth; Lehning, Amanda J.; Austin, Michael J.; Peck, Michael D.

In: Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Vol. 52, No. 8, 2009, p. 815-836.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anthony, Elizabeth ; Lehning, Amanda J. ; Austin, Michael J. ; Peck, Michael D. / Assessing elder mistreatment : Instrument development and implications for adult protective services. In: Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 2009 ; Vol. 52, No. 8. pp. 815-836.
@article{14a61b2cb0304127aacd85eb538e0572,
title = "Assessing elder mistreatment: Instrument development and implications for adult protective services",
abstract = "Assessment of elder mistreatment is hindered by a myriad of factors, including inconsistent definitions, divergent and untested theories of causation, and limited research attention to the problem. In addition to these difficulties, professionals encounter complex situations requiring considerable clinical assessment skills and decision-making capacity. Adult Protective Services (APS) workers, as well as mandated reporters such as healthcare providers and social workers, need an assessment tool that can reliably and accurately assess for elder mistreatment. Based on a structured review of screening and assessment instruments, this article discusses the psychometric properties of 15 instruments and the relevance to APS. Implications of the findings for future research, practice, and policy are discussed.",
keywords = "APS, Assessment, Elder abuse, Elder mistreatment, Screening tools",
author = "Elizabeth Anthony and Lehning, {Amanda J.} and Austin, {Michael J.} and Peck, {Michael D.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/01634370902918597",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "815--836",
journal = "Journal of Gerontological Social Work",
issn = "0163-4372",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing elder mistreatment

T2 - Instrument development and implications for adult protective services

AU - Anthony, Elizabeth

AU - Lehning, Amanda J.

AU - Austin, Michael J.

AU - Peck, Michael D.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Assessment of elder mistreatment is hindered by a myriad of factors, including inconsistent definitions, divergent and untested theories of causation, and limited research attention to the problem. In addition to these difficulties, professionals encounter complex situations requiring considerable clinical assessment skills and decision-making capacity. Adult Protective Services (APS) workers, as well as mandated reporters such as healthcare providers and social workers, need an assessment tool that can reliably and accurately assess for elder mistreatment. Based on a structured review of screening and assessment instruments, this article discusses the psychometric properties of 15 instruments and the relevance to APS. Implications of the findings for future research, practice, and policy are discussed.

AB - Assessment of elder mistreatment is hindered by a myriad of factors, including inconsistent definitions, divergent and untested theories of causation, and limited research attention to the problem. In addition to these difficulties, professionals encounter complex situations requiring considerable clinical assessment skills and decision-making capacity. Adult Protective Services (APS) workers, as well as mandated reporters such as healthcare providers and social workers, need an assessment tool that can reliably and accurately assess for elder mistreatment. Based on a structured review of screening and assessment instruments, this article discusses the psychometric properties of 15 instruments and the relevance to APS. Implications of the findings for future research, practice, and policy are discussed.

KW - APS

KW - Assessment

KW - Elder abuse

KW - Elder mistreatment

KW - Screening tools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71449091679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71449091679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01634370902918597

DO - 10.1080/01634370902918597

M3 - Article

C2 - 19830609

AN - SCOPUS:71449091679

VL - 52

SP - 815

EP - 836

JO - Journal of Gerontological Social Work

JF - Journal of Gerontological Social Work

SN - 0163-4372

IS - 8

ER -