Are "decoupled" farm program payments really decoupled? An empirical evaluation

Barry K. Goodwin, Ashok Mishra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This analysis utilizes farm-level data to evaluate the extent to which U.S. farm program benefits, particularly direct payments, bring about distortions in production. The issue is important in WTO negotiations and in the debate over the distortionary effects of decoupled ("green-box") payments. Our results suggest that the distortions brought about by AMTA payments, though statistically significant in some cases, are very modest. Larger effects are implied for market loss assistance payments. Probit models suggest that AMTA payments do not influence the likelihood that agents will acquire more land. Our results are reinforced using an aggregate county-level acreage model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-89
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume88
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

farm programs
green box
Negotiating
markets
farms
Farms
Payment
Decoupled payments
Farm
Empirical evaluation

Keywords

  • Acreage response
  • Decoupled payments
  • WTO green box

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Are "decoupled" farm program payments really decoupled? An empirical evaluation. / Goodwin, Barry K.; Mishra, Ashok.

In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 88, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 73-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7207e0ae399d46eb9d610f21b227f2b8,
title = "Are {"}decoupled{"} farm program payments really decoupled? An empirical evaluation",
abstract = "This analysis utilizes farm-level data to evaluate the extent to which U.S. farm program benefits, particularly direct payments, bring about distortions in production. The issue is important in WTO negotiations and in the debate over the distortionary effects of decoupled ({"}green-box{"}) payments. Our results suggest that the distortions brought about by AMTA payments, though statistically significant in some cases, are very modest. Larger effects are implied for market loss assistance payments. Probit models suggest that AMTA payments do not influence the likelihood that agents will acquire more land. Our results are reinforced using an aggregate county-level acreage model.",
keywords = "Acreage response, Decoupled payments, WTO green box",
author = "Goodwin, {Barry K.} and Ashok Mishra",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00839.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "73--89",
journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0002-9092",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are "decoupled" farm program payments really decoupled? An empirical evaluation

AU - Goodwin, Barry K.

AU - Mishra, Ashok

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - This analysis utilizes farm-level data to evaluate the extent to which U.S. farm program benefits, particularly direct payments, bring about distortions in production. The issue is important in WTO negotiations and in the debate over the distortionary effects of decoupled ("green-box") payments. Our results suggest that the distortions brought about by AMTA payments, though statistically significant in some cases, are very modest. Larger effects are implied for market loss assistance payments. Probit models suggest that AMTA payments do not influence the likelihood that agents will acquire more land. Our results are reinforced using an aggregate county-level acreage model.

AB - This analysis utilizes farm-level data to evaluate the extent to which U.S. farm program benefits, particularly direct payments, bring about distortions in production. The issue is important in WTO negotiations and in the debate over the distortionary effects of decoupled ("green-box") payments. Our results suggest that the distortions brought about by AMTA payments, though statistically significant in some cases, are very modest. Larger effects are implied for market loss assistance payments. Probit models suggest that AMTA payments do not influence the likelihood that agents will acquire more land. Our results are reinforced using an aggregate county-level acreage model.

KW - Acreage response

KW - Decoupled payments

KW - WTO green box

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644771256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644771256&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00839.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00839.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33644771256

VL - 88

SP - 73

EP - 89

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0002-9092

IS - 1

ER -